 |
| Author |
Message |
|
FlyingGreg
|
Post subject: Re: A random thought on mediocrity  Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:37 am |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
Posts: 5661
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
|
volsunghawk wrote: FlyingGreg wrote:
Serious question here....when do we stop using the "we are young" crutch? It's legit... but I hear it from Pete every week to explain lapses and errors -- and I wonder when it's going to expire.
Is it a "crutch" when it's absolutely true? Did you know that the Seahawks have twice as many players with 3 or fewer years in the league than they do players with 6+ years? Sure, part of the "youth" argument is that young players make mistakes. But part of it - and this is especially true of a team that's going through a rebuild - is cohesiveness. Because of the youth of the team, they haven't built those strong bonds that you see on more veteran teams. Look at defenses like the Ravens and Steelers, for example. They've cycled through young players pretty effectively across many years, but it's because they were able first to establish that veteran core and then acclimate new players into that core while allowing older players to retire or move on to other teams. If you draft well, that process is self-sustaining. But we're not at that point... we're still developing that core on both sides of the ball. That's why you still get Rice and Wilson thinking that a raised hand means different things. That's why you get miscommunications in zone coverage that lets a Lions WR get so open past Sherman. The biggest fix for that is time and experience playing together, imo. I said it's legit -- I believe it. My question was...when does it stop being true? Most of our youth is coming up on at least two full seasons under their belt. I guess what I want to know is when we expect the youthful errors and lapses to be conquered? I have no idea. To me, it can be dangerous to default to that to explain every problem we are having. I think I'm a little alarmed that Pete seems to always bring it up. After all, the youth movement is his trump card. But I'd almost prefer he just says, "we told you it's a 4-year plan and anything we accomplish in year 3 is icing on the cake".  _________________ @SeahawkGregYEAH, WE HAVE A DUDE NAMED CHRISTINE...DEAL WITH IT!
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Seahawk Sailor
|
Post subject: Re: A random thought on mediocrity Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:53 am |
|
| * Navy Badass * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 16253
Location: Bothell
|
FlyingGreg wrote: Good post, Jonathan. I like how your Navy mind works.  Serious question here....when do we stop using the "we are young" crutch? It's legit... but I hear it from Pete every week to explain lapses and errors -- and I wonder when it's going to expire. Thanks. I think the "we are young" crutch may be more along the lines of "we are young, inexperienced, and not opportunistic" instead. That was more at the core of my thoughts here. Much of it is the "opportunistic" part really. If we break down the losses, we find only a very few yards separate us from being viewed as an unstoppable, undefeated juggernaut, and perceived mediocrity. And it's all about failing to take advantage of opportunity. In each loss, there were one or two plays that if we'd taken the opportunity we had, would have changed the outcome. It's about failing to execute when we have the opportunity presented to us, rather than just being young. And the second we begin to take those advantages, we'll win those games. The Falcons are exactly the type of team we could become in a couple of years, and a good example to bring up here. Are those wins just flukes because they've struggled against almost every team they've faced, or have they simply taken advantage of key plays - executed when it mattered most - to win those games? _________________ I blog, I tweet. When I'm not writing or goofing around on Seahawks.NET.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
themunn
|
Post subject: Re: A random thought on mediocrity Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:13 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 4:38 pm
Posts: 1110
|
FlyingGreg wrote: I said it's legit -- I believe it. My question was...when does it stop being true? Most of our youth is coming up on at least two full seasons under their belt. I guess what I want to know is when we expect the youthful errors and lapses to be conquered? I have no idea. To me, it can be dangerous to default to that to explain every problem we are having. I think I'm a little alarmed that Pete seems to always bring it up. After all, the youth movement is his trump card. But I'd almost prefer he just says, "we told you it's a 4-year plan and anything we accomplish in year 3 is icing on the cake". Youth stops being an excuse when you have more players with 5+ years experience than <5 years experience IMO. Right now, on offense we have: Okung 3 Carpenter 2 Unger 4 McQuistan 7 Giacomini 5 Lynch 6 Robinson 7 Miller 6 Wilson 1 Rice 6 Tate 3 Baldwin 2 Turbin 1 McCoy 3 Moffit 2 So our first 11 is bordering on experienced, but our depth is still very young (and in all likelihood, next year, McQuistan and Giacomini are expendeble, and we're looking at a very young team, but with a lot of experience, because they've all come in and contributed as rookies) Our defense is a strange one: Bryant 5 Mebane 6 Branch 6 Clemons 10 KJ 2 Wagner 1 Hill 8 Sherman 2 Browner 8 Jones 5 ET 3 Chancellor 3 Scruggs 1 Irvin 1 Trufant 10 We have a lot of really experienced players in there, but of them, Hill and Trufant's age is actually beginning to reduce their effectiveness instead of increase their experience, Browner is only in his 2nd NFL season and Bryant had just 9 games experience until PC took over as a situational player, he's still "young" in terms of experience (he has only 3 more games experience than Ndamukong Suh, for example)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MontanaHawk05
|
Post subject: Re: A random thought on mediocrity Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:30 pm |
|
| * 17Power Blogger * |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 9688
|
FlyingGreg wrote: volsunghawk wrote: FlyingGreg wrote:
Serious question here....when do we stop using the "we are young" crutch? It's legit... but I hear it from Pete every week to explain lapses and errors -- and I wonder when it's going to expire.
Is it a "crutch" when it's absolutely true? Did you know that the Seahawks have twice as many players with 3 or fewer years in the league than they do players with 6+ years? Sure, part of the "youth" argument is that young players make mistakes. But part of it - and this is especially true of a team that's going through a rebuild - is cohesiveness. Because of the youth of the team, they haven't built those strong bonds that you see on more veteran teams. Look at defenses like the Ravens and Steelers, for example. They've cycled through young players pretty effectively across many years, but it's because they were able first to establish that veteran core and then acclimate new players into that core while allowing older players to retire or move on to other teams. If you draft well, that process is self-sustaining. But we're not at that point... we're still developing that core on both sides of the ball. That's why you still get Rice and Wilson thinking that a raised hand means different things. That's why you get miscommunications in zone coverage that lets a Lions WR get so open past Sherman. The biggest fix for that is time and experience playing together, imo. I said it's legit -- I believe it. My question was...when does it stop being true? Most of our youth is coming up on at least two full seasons under their belt. I guess what I want to know is when we expect the youthful errors and lapses to be conquered? I have no idea. To me, it can be dangerous to default to that to explain every problem we are having. I think I'm a little alarmed that Pete seems to always bring it up. After all, the youth movement is his trump card. But I'd almost prefer he just says, "we told you it's a 4-year plan and anything we accomplish in year 3 is icing on the cake". Which makes more sense: to assume that an extremely young team will improve, or to assume it won't? It's also worth pointing out that Miami's final ten points on Sunday were scored at the expense of our two OLDEST defensive players. The question of "when do we improve?" is valid, but hey, when one of the weak link's replacements is already on the roster and has a short but strong record of play, it's easier for me to be optimistic. _________________ GO HAWKS!!! Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!Follow me on Twitter at @17power
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
