| Author |
Message |
|
Hawkstorian
|
Post subject: 12/2 vs. Bears  Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 4:47 pm |
|
| * NET Staff * |
 |
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:19 am
Posts: 2170
Location: Spokane
|
|
Really needs to replace the Cowgirls/Feables game on National TV.
_________________
This post is intended for entertainment purposes only.
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
RolandDeschain
|
Post subject: Re: 12/2 vs. Bears Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 4:53 pm |
|
| * NET Expertise Expert * |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 14230
Location: Kirkland, WA
|
|
WHAT?! How dare you suggest America's Scrotum--err, Team, be replaced on national TV!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
kidhawk
|
Post subject: Re: 12/2 vs. Bears Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 5:07 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:00 pm
Posts: 10269
Location: Anchorage, AK
|
RolandDeschain wrote: America's Scrotum--err, Team, should be replaced! Fixed it for you 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Riley12
|
Post subject: Re: 12/2 vs. Bears Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 5:09 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:14 am
Posts: 1962
|
|
Not gunna happen. I expect our game against the 49ers to be flexed into prime time, if the 49ers haven't
used up their allotment already.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
fishhawk
|
Post subject: Re: 12/2 vs. Bears Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 5:40 pm |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
|
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2011 1:56 am
Posts: 9
|
|
Better not be flexed! I have a 9 pm flight back to seattle after the game and will have to sell my tickets if thats the case.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawker84
|
Post subject: Re: 12/2 vs. Bears Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 8:45 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm
Posts: 2090
Location: Tri Cities, WA
|
|
start looking for buyers... if the division race or seeding is decided by this game, it will get flexed to prime time....
_________________
On to the Next Episode
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BullHawk33
|
Post subject: Re: 12/2 vs. Bears Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:15 am |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 3:47 pm
Posts: 34
Location: Puyallup
|
|
I was traveling for business this week waiting to catch my flight back to Seattle last night from DFW. Over some time, I started feeling nauseous and wasn't sure what was going on. Then I realized I was too close to the Dallas team store. Once I moved a couple of gates away I started feeling much better. It may be a coincidence but I think not.
I agree that there are much more appealing games to be had. I would be extremely surprised if they ever bumped up a Seahawks game this year.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BocciHawk
|
Post subject: Re: 12/2 vs. Bears Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:52 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 2:12 pm
Posts: 558
|
|
Don't agree with the PP. I think there's a lot of interest in the Seahawks and especially Wilson and Lynch, and we don't have a lot of Sunday night or Monday night exposure this year. (Just one game so far, correct? Packers at Seahawks, which became infamous.) I think looking at our schedule that the most likely games to be flexed would be us at Bears or 49ers at Seahawks.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
smashmouth59
|
Post subject: Re: 12/2 vs. Bears Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 10:04 am |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 991
Location: Olympia
|
BocciHawk wrote: Don't agree with the PP. I think there's a lot of interest in the Seahawks and especially Wilson and Lynch, and we don't have a lot of Sunday night or Monday night exposure this year. (Just one game so far, correct? Packers at Seahawks, which became infamous.) I think looking at our schedule that the most likely games to be flexed would be us at Bears or 49ers at Seahawks. I think the national audience actually enjoys watching games at Centurylink. Of course i am biased but the site of our stadium, especially at night, with the 12th man in full throat, is very impressive. I doubt the Chi town game gets flexed as that would give us an advantage. No 10 am start. There is no way the south alaska Seahawks get a break like that.
_________________
"I can "see" the Niners opening up at the Clink and being choked out so bad that the Hawks send the Niners into a downward spiral of futility that will make the 2010 losing streak look like a title run." - LoafOfTatupu
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hawkstorian
|
Post subject: Re: 12/2 vs. Bears Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 10:09 am |
|
| * NET Staff * |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:19 am
Posts: 2170
Location: Spokane
|
|
We should find out Monday.
_________________
This post is intended for entertainment purposes only.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Barthawk
|
Post subject: Re: 12/2 vs. Bears Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 10:14 am |
|
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:17 am
Posts: 2031
Location: San Antonio, TX by way of Kalispell, MT
|
|
I would think that even with the paltry records that DAL/PHI currently have, they are still a bigger draw nationally than the Bears/Seahawks..
_________________
_____________________
Where can I find Seahawks98.com???
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BlueTalon
|
Post subject: Re: 12/2 vs. Bears Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 7:28 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:06 am
Posts: 6798
Location: Eastern Washington
|
BocciHawk wrote: Don't agree with the PP. I think there's a lot of interest in the Seahawks and especially Wilson and Lynch, and we don't have a lot of Sunday night or Monday night exposure this year. (Just one game so far, correct? Packers at Seahawks, which became infamous.) I think looking at our schedule that the most likely games to be flexed would be us at Bears or 49ers at Seahawks. We already had a Thursday night game against the Digits. I kinda doubt the next digits game will also be nationally televised.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CrimsonWazzu
|
Post subject: Re: 12/2 vs. Bears Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:09 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:33 am
Posts: 141
|
Barthawk wrote: I would think that even with the paltry records that DAL/PHI currently have, they are still a bigger draw nationally than the Bears/Seahawks.. Dallas will probably be 6-5 and that alone will be enough for them to justify having that game on, even though Philly will be at best 4-7. Sad because they both suck and neither will be in the playoffs.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
kearly
|
Post subject: Re: 12/2 vs. Bears Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:43 am |
|
| * Mr Random Thought * |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am
Posts: 7239
|
|
I could see Dallas contending in the NFC East. New York seems destined for a 9-7 season, and Dallas currently owns the tiebreaker against them by a slim margin. If Dallas finishes 5-2, assuming those losses aren't in the division, they are probably in. Heck, they might end up hosting the Seahawks.
_________________  "I believe there’s merit to the idea that once something in life becomes conventional, it’s no longer the safest path to success." -Matt Waldman "If everyone's thinking alike, no one's thinking." -Bill Walsh
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RolandDeschain
|
Post subject: Re: 12/2 vs. Bears Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:18 am |
|
| * NET Expertise Expert * |
|
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 14230
Location: Kirkland, WA
|
kearly wrote: Heck, they might end up hosting the Seahawks. I'd pray for us to get a game there, if we don't win the division. It's the most mild enemy environment I can imagine in the entire NFL. Against a mediocre team in the playoffs, too.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
dunceface
|
Post subject: Re: 12/2 vs. Bears Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 2:01 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 10:29 am
Posts: 1914
|
|
Bruce could get his first NFL sack AND first NFL playoff sack against them...
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
endzorn
|
Post subject: Re: 12/2 vs. Bears Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 6:23 am |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 6:14 pm
Posts: 1732
|
|
I hope not. I get it HD on Sunday Ticket and they black out national games so you're forced to watch the local feed. Rather have it on HD so I can really see how crooked Pete's nose is.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BocciHawk
|
Post subject: Re: 12/2 vs. Bears Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:23 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 2:12 pm
Posts: 558
|
BlueTalon wrote: BocciHawk wrote: Don't agree with the PP. I think there's a lot of interest in the Seahawks and especially Wilson and Lynch, and we don't have a lot of Sunday night or Monday night exposure this year. (Just one game so far, correct? Packers at Seahawks, which became infamous.) I think looking at our schedule that the most likely games to be flexed would be us at Bears or 49ers at Seahawks. We already had a Thursday night game against the Digits. I kinda doubt the next digits game will also be nationally televised. Maybe I'm old school but I don't consider Thursday night games nationally televised. Sunday night football is a MUCH bigger deal than either Thursday or Monday night...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BlueTalon
|
Post subject: Re: 12/2 vs. Bears Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 11:27 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:06 am
Posts: 6798
Location: Eastern Washington
|
BocciHawk wrote: BlueTalon wrote: BocciHawk wrote: Don't agree with the PP. I think there's a lot of interest in the Seahawks and especially Wilson and Lynch, and we don't have a lot of Sunday night or Monday night exposure this year. (Just one game so far, correct? Packers at Seahawks, which became infamous.) I think looking at our schedule that the most likely games to be flexed would be us at Bears or 49ers at Seahawks. We already had a Thursday night game against the Digits. I kinda doubt the next digits game will also be nationally televised. Maybe I'm old school but I don't consider Thursday night games nationally televised. Sunday night football is a MUCH bigger deal than either Thursday or Monday night... It doesn't matter whether or not you consider TNF games to be nationally televised. It matters what the League and the Networks think. And I'm pretty sure they consider TNF to be nationally televised.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
The Radish
|
Post subject: Re: 12/2 vs. Bears Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 11:33 am |
|
| * NET Radish * |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:18 pm
Posts: 14199
Location: Spokane, Wa.
|
You need someone with you to wake you up cause you're dreaming!  _________________  Still missing you everyday pal.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: 12thMode, BamaHawk, bellingerga, BigMeach, daveman918, dbmack, fisholot, formido, FortWorthSeahawk, Google [Bot], Grahamkrackker253, HawkFan72, Hawkfan77, HawksSoc, hedgehawk, Hendo66, hidn, Jville, Kawata, KentuckyHawk, Leep, Malfunkshun, McGruff, Missing_Clink, mrblitz, onanygivensunday, Onyx, polarbill1999, Pstark3, quadsas, razgriz737, Shock2k, SilNWest, Sleepy, SmokinHawk, Stephen SeaHawking, the ditch, TheHawkDoc, therealjohncarlson, travlinhawk, Veilside, Wiseguy, xCalibur, Zebulon Dak and 161 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
