| Author |
Message |
|
BigMeach
|
Post subject: Seahawks D  Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:20 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 12:11 am
Posts: 256
|
|
I don't want to say that they are back due to who they played. But they didn't allow a single point today. The only points scored were their d against our o. Gotta like that.
_________________
"Know thy self, know thy enemy. A thousand battles, a thousand victories." - Sun Tzu
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
Fox0r
|
Post subject: Re: Seahawks D Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:22 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:30 pm
Posts: 1852
Location: Lynnwood, WA
|
|
Jason Jones was back. Man's gunna get paid.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
bellingerga
|
Post subject: Re: Seahawks D Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:22 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:28 pm
Posts: 4996
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
|
|
yeah for some reason I was getting frustrated with them today then I realized they pitched a shutout......
Keep it up dudes.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
NorCalSeahawk
|
Post subject: Re: Seahawks D Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:27 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:54 pm
Posts: 1073
|
Fox0r wrote: Jason Jones was back. Man's gunna get paid. Yep, it is amazing how much of a difference he makes up the gut of that D on passing downs.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sign37now
|
Post subject: Re: Seahawks D Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:30 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 4:49 am
Posts: 159
|
|
They need to bring it on the road!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CurryStopstheRuns
|
Post subject: Re: Seahawks D Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:35 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:52 pm
Posts: 1443
|
|
I have a feeling that they are going to let Branch walk and use that savings to lock up Jones long-term.
_________________
I am a firm believer in luck, and I found that the harder I work the more I have of it.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ensett
|
Post subject: Re: Seahawks D Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:44 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:26 am
Posts: 1195
|
|
i dont think they will let branch walk, he fills a completely different role than jones
_________________
----
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CurryStopstheRuns
|
Post subject: Re: Seahawks D Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:05 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:52 pm
Posts: 1443
|
ensett wrote: i dont think they will let branch walk, he fills a completely different role than jones He fills a role that can be filled by a low-cost free agent DT. He provides nothing but run defense.
_________________
I am a firm believer in luck, and I found that the harder I work the more I have of it.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Wenhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Seahawks D Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:05 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 6:38 am
Posts: 1288
|
|
Between Scruggs and Howard who or they better replacements for Branch or Jones. I though both are more pass rushing DT's so to me that means we are more likely to let Jones walk. But how much can Jones really get on the market? I'd give him 5 mil a year for another two or three years.
_________________  Beastquake with epic commentary http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gd_Vd43Vxa0
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BigMeach
|
Post subject: Re: Seahawks D Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:33 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
|
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 12:11 am
Posts: 256
|
|
It completely depends on his value on the market next year and if he wants to win a superbowl.
_________________
"Know thy self, know thy enemy. A thousand battles, a thousand victories." - Sun Tzu
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Blitzer88
|
Post subject: Re: Seahawks D Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:36 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
Posts: 8208
Location: Pasco, WA
|
|
Why don't we just keep both Branch and Jones? I mean I have a feeling that the FO could find a way to make it work.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Steve2222
|
Post subject: Re: Seahawks D Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:53 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 7:12 am
Posts: 372
|
|
You know your defense is good when you think they played bad and they allowed no points.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
dunceface
|
Post subject: Re: Seahawks D Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 6:53 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 10:29 am
Posts: 2005
|
|
And it would have been a complete shutout if they would have called that offsides properly on that fumble recovery play...
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
  |
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 13 posts ] |
|
Users browsing this forum: 12HawkFan, AbsolutNET, Animalman, Basis4day, bluengreen, Cartire, grizbob, IBleedBlueAndGreen, JimZorn10, KK84, LargentFan, Lawke, m0ng0, Majestic-12 [Bot], onanygivensunday, oregonhawkfan, Red Beard, rigelian, ryan419_2002, sainthawk29, SeaChase, Sturm, tjgamer555, volsunghawk, Wenhawk, WillySchu and 136 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
