Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE ESSENTIAL SEAHAWKS COMMUNITY » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Which starting WR would you bench (or release) so that the new guy could start?
Sidney Rice 2%  2%  [ 2 ]
Golden Tate 26%  26%  [ 24 ]
Doug Baldwin 72%  72%  [ 68 ]
Total votes : 94
 
 
Author Message
 Post subject: If Seattle did invest in a WR, who would he replace?
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 11:17 pm 
* Mr Random Thought *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am
Posts: 7239
There has been a lot of talk this year about how WR should be an offseason priority for the Seahawks. I don't actually share that opinion, but regardless, it's a possiblity that Seattle might go out and invest in a starting WR this offseason, either in free agency or with a high draft pick. If that happens, one of Rice, Tate, or Baldwin would lose their starting job. Tate and Baldwin are on cheap, team controlled contracts. Rice is owed $7 million next season. Personally, I would not feel great about investing big for a starting WR because I don't want to bench any of those three guys (unless it was for Wes Welker).

But if it did happen, who would you bench to start him? Personally, I'd bench Baldwin- and only because I think he's our 3rd best WR right now.

For the purposes of this poll, I'm leaving off the option for drafting/signing a backup WR and keeping our current trio- that's because I'm more curious about which player you'd feel most comfortable with upgrading on.

_________________
Image
"I believe there’s merit to the idea that once something in life becomes conventional, it’s no longer the safest path to success." -Matt Waldman
"If everyone's thinking alike, no one's thinking." -Bill Walsh


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: If Seattle did invest in a WR, who would he replace?
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 11:22 pm 
NET Starter
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:37 pm
Posts: 311
I would draft a true #1 or #2 guy and move Tate to the slot i think that is where he would perform best. Brandon Coleman anyone?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: If Seattle did invest in a WR, who would he replace?
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 11:43 pm 
* NET Nobody *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm
Posts: 4873
I voted Baldwin only because his injuries worry me. Golden is on the upswing and I'm willing to pay Sidney Rice his 7 million for the production that he has. Rice's connection with Russell will only get better and now that Sidney has put some meat on those bones, I think his injuries will be infrequent.

_________________
Joe Vellano, DT, 6'1", 300lbs, 61 tkls 14 TFL, 6 sacks" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nc_yzeVi-eU, Mike Catapano 6'4" 271
QB Jordan Rodgers 6'1" 212# 2539 Yards, 60% completion 15td/5int


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: If Seattle did invest in a WR, who would he replace?
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 11:54 pm 
*BRONZE SUPPORTER*
*BRONZE SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:17 pm
Posts: 2415
Location: Oroville CA.
Dougie fresh is my vote. I want that Weaton kid in Oregon State.

_________________
Image
"Tracy Porter lost his manhood when Marshawn stiff armed him" some dude on youtube.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: If Seattle did invest in a WR, who would he replace?
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 12:11 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 10:34 am
Posts: 519
Location: Olympia, WA
Rice has had 1.5 injury free seasons out of 6. just don't trust him to Stay healthy. I say you turn Tate into a slot guy and draft a serious number one guy, move Rice over to the number 2. Make Baldwin a situational Wr. (that gets used a lot.) We still don't have that #1 guy yet. We need that wr one the roster that is drafted to Complement RW3'S skillset, imo


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: If Seattle did invest in a WR, who would he replace?
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 1:00 am 
NET Starter
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:53 am
Posts: 492
I would also move Baldwin down the depth chart.I am also on board with WR being not the huge need some people think.I dont like taking WRs in round one.A day 2 type pick in rounds 2 through 4 would be fine for me.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: If Seattle did invest in a WR, who would he replace?
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 1:03 am 
*BRONZE SUPPORTER*
*BRONZE SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:17 pm
Posts: 2415
Location: Oroville CA.
Take a wide out in rounds 2 and 4 I think you can get #2 from Oregon State in the 4th if lucky.

_________________
Image
"Tracy Porter lost his manhood when Marshawn stiff armed him" some dude on youtube.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: If Seattle did invest in a WR, who would he replace?
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 1:08 am 
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:13 pm
Posts: 3467
Location: Puyallup, WA USA
Would you consider....two for one? Do not bring Kearse or Obo back, but instead get a 3rd Round Draft choice......6'5" with good hands and a strong brain.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: If Seattle did invest in a WR, who would he replace?
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 4:05 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:59 pm
Posts: 818
Location: Dallas, TX
Why does he have to replace anyone? If we get a kid that's awesome, traditionally speaking he won't have =an impact until year 3 anyway. Why wouldn't he sit behind one of the options listed above, instead of getting toasted as a rook?

IMO, the choice is D) Sit him till year 3.

_________________
"Last show in New Orleans, Russell Wilson of next year's Superbowl Champs will join us." -Colin Cowherd

2013 NFL Draft picks: 1.25, 2.24, 3.25, 4.26, 5.25, 6.26, 7.8 (from BUF), 7.25

Twitter handle @Seahawkscrazy I follow ALL 12s!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: If Seattle did invest in a WR, who would he replace?
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 4:19 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 4:38 pm
Posts: 1115
Ideally we'd be drafting a number 1, so that would just move everyone 1 down the depth chart, NWR and Rice on the outsides, Tate playing slot or outside on WR heavy sets, Baldwin also playing slot - ideally rotating all of them to keep them fresh (and less prone to injury!)


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: If Seattle did invest in a WR, who would he replace?
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 4:38 am 
* NET Baller *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 11340
Location: Graham, WA
That's the beauty of competition, the best players will play! I'd think Baldwin would get pushed aside a bit, seeing as this offense seems to favor bigger receivers on the outside. But I think if Tate can keep playing even at a fraction of what he played yesterday, He could easily change their minds about having a bigger receiver on the outside, we'll see though.

_________________
Image
Official Tharold Simon Fan Club Member


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: If Seattle did invest in a WR, who would he replace?
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 4:43 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 6:38 am
Posts: 1270
Draft another big guy for the outside, let Tate and Baldwin work the inside and draft a late round speedy WR who can take some reps on the outside for the deep balls every now and then.

_________________
Image
Beastquake with epic commentary
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gd_Vd43Vxa0


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: If Seattle did invest in a WR, who would he replace?
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 5:08 am 
* NET Hottie *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:27 pm
Posts: 1313
I think we should keep all 3 guys and add another WR in the draft. If we let anyone go, it should be Martin or Kearse. Obo is a very valuable special teams player more so than a receiver. JMO.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: If Seattle did invest in a WR, who would he replace?
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 5:08 am 
*Scott of Smacksville*
*Scott of Smacksville*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 7348
We have two real offensive needs: a really good TE, and and elusive player with silly speed at any of the 3 skill positions. If that is a WR, then so be it, we will run more 3 WR sets. We have silly speed with Turbin already, but with Lynch, Turbo is just not going to be on the field that much. Unless Bevell starts designing some two RB sets, which would be a good idea.

_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: If Seattle did invest in a WR, who would he replace?
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 5:38 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:14 am
Posts: 1121
Kelly.Orr wrote:
I would draft a true #1 or #2 guy and move Tate to the slot i think that is where he would perform best. Brandon Coleman anyone?

:13: I voted Baldwin for that exact reason.

_________________
"??? How do you know he's awful? We've seen the guy play 2 regular season games." -SoulfishHawk
"16 starts in 9 years is all you need to know." - Tsizzle
"OMFG! LOL! Are you for real?" :lol: -ivotuk


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: If Seattle did invest in a WR, who would he replace?
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 5:57 am 
NET Rookie
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 6:45 am
Posts: 103
If we draft a wide receiver he won't be replacing anyone, he will be adding depth to the pool. I think we have less of a need at WR and more of a need for a good second TE to go with Miller. I'd rather try and draft a solid TE if one's available and pick up a WR in the later rounds.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: If Seattle did invest in a WR, who would he replace?
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 6:11 am 
* NET Hottie *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:27 pm
Posts: 1313
On D, we could probably add another LB and DT.
I do agree about a WR/TE as priorities though.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: If Seattle did invest in a WR, who would he replace?
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 7:04 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:14 am
Posts: 1121
debevemos wrote:
If we draft a wide receiver he won't be replacing anyone, he will be adding depth to the pool. I think we have less of a need at WR and more of a need for a good second TE to go with Miller. I'd rather try and draft a solid TE if one's available and pick up a WR in the later rounds.


Technically you are replacing someone...just not the three listed. I believe when he said "replace" the op was saying in the starting lineup....if you list the three in the poll at WR#1, #2, #3...and not literally kick the guy off the team.

_________________
"??? How do you know he's awful? We've seen the guy play 2 regular season games." -SoulfishHawk
"16 starts in 9 years is all you need to know." - Tsizzle
"OMFG! LOL! Are you for real?" :lol: -ivotuk


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: If Seattle did invest in a WR, who would he replace?
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 7:29 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:22 pm
Posts: 1196
I would keep Doug simply so he wouldn't go to the 9ers, actually, same goes for Tate.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: If Seattle did invest in a WR, who would he replace?
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 7:57 am 
* 17Power Blogger *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 9705
I fully understand the cost issue, but I just don't see this team going deep into the playoffs with its current receiving stable. We need an upgrade. It doesn't have to be in the first-round, and of course Pete and John will do all the scouting necessary to ensure that it DOESN'T come from the first-round. But the status quo isn't an option.

_________________
GO HAWKS!!!

Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!

Follow me on Twitter at @17power


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE ESSENTIAL SEAHAWKS COMMUNITY » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]



 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.