| Author |
Message |
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: wow.... we held Ponder to 63 YARDS Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 4:44 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm Posts: 5194 Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
|
Hahahhahah.
Peterson might have kicked our ass, but we just killed Ponder. Love it.
And you guys don't forget that offensive line of the Vikings is very good. They are built for run blocking. And Peterson is the Calvin Johnson of RB's. We just need to cut down on the missed tackles.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
entropyrulesall
|
Post subject: Re: wow.... we held Ponder to 63 YARDS Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 4:46 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:00 pm Posts: 172 Location: Federal Way, WA
|
|
passer rating of 36.8 and still every 3rd down was a heart attack
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hedgehawk
|
Post subject: Re: wow.... we held Ponder to 63 YARDS Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 4:47 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 1:37 pm Posts: 462
|
|
20 missed tackles is crazy.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Re: wow.... we held Ponder to 63 YARDS Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 4:48 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm Posts: 5194 Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
entropyrulesall wrote: passer rating of 36.8 and still every 3rd down was a heart attack Was a heart attack for Viking fans maybe. They were 3-10 on 3rd down. Not too bad.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SharkHawk
|
Post subject: Re: wow.... we held Ponder to 63 YARDS Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 4:48 pm |
|
| * NET Alumni * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:47 am Posts: 3474
|
|
This was the guy that half the board went crazy that we didn't go get and "neglected the QB position". I just didn't see much from Ponder in college, aside from a pretty good second half to his senior year. He's not a guy like RW who just flat out kicked butt for 4 years. Ponder was GOOD in college. He wasn't great, but was very efficient for about 6 games and had a nice workout. He's gotten progressively worse as his NFL career has gone. Can't say that for Russell.
_________________  R.I.P. Dad. I miss you. You will never be forgotten 1/12/39 - 8/7/08
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
theENGLISHseahawk
|
Post subject: Re: wow.... we held Ponder to 63 YARDS Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 4:53 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am Posts: 6405
|
|
It was a laughable pick when he went in the mid first in 2011. At Florida State he was so limited, kept making bone head plays (since translated to the NFL) and couldn't even generate sufficient velocity on a WR screen. Today's performance shouldn't be a surprise to anyone. Expect this to become a regular event for the Vikings, right up until the day they're forced to draft another R1 quarterback.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Throwdown
|
Post subject: Re: wow.... we held Ponder to 63 YARDS Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 4:54 pm |
|
| * NET Baller * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am Posts: 11700 Location: Graham, WA
|
theENGLISHseahawk wrote: It was a laughable pick when he went in the mid first in 2011. At Florida State he was so limited, kept making bone head plays (since translated to the NFL) and couldn't even generate sufficient velocity on a WR screen. Today's performance shouldn't be a surprise to anyone. Expect this to become a regular event for the Vikings, right up until the day they're forced to draft another R1 quarterback. I don't get why they never gave Joe Webb a shot.
_________________ "Never Say Never, because limits, like fears, are often just an illusion" - Michael Jordan
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Rat
|
Post subject: Re: wow.... we held Ponder to 63 YARDS Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 4:57 pm |
|
| * NET Cynic * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:42 pm Posts: 3492 Location: St. Louis, MO
|
|
Pfft, 63 yards. The Cards held him to 58. Our defense blows.
In all seriousness, I can't remember anyone who wanted to use a first round pick on Ponder. Some thought he might be a decent 2nd round choice, but that was one of the bigger WTF type picks of recent years, along with Bruce Irvin and Tyson Alualu.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: wow.... we held Ponder to 63 YARDS Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 4:57 pm |
|
| * Report Button * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm Posts: 7031
|
|
We need Ponder and the Boys to knock of Detroit next week. So, hopefully, this performance will be repeated, AFTER next Sunday.
_________________ @ryanadamdavis
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Re: wow.... we held Ponder to 63 YARDS Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 4:58 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm Posts: 5194 Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
theENGLISHseahawk wrote: It was a laughable pick when he went in the mid first in 2011. At Florida State he was so limited, kept making bone head plays (since translated to the NFL) and couldn't even generate sufficient velocity on a WR screen. Today's performance shouldn't be a surprise to anyone. Expect this to become a regular event for the Vikings, right up until the day they're forced to draft another R1 quarterback. Not gonna stop tooting your own horn are you? 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Starrman44
|
Post subject: Re: wow.... we held Ponder to 63 YARDS Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:03 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:35 pm Posts: 459 Location: Canby, OR
|
entropyrulesall wrote: passer rating of 36.8 and still every 3rd down was a heart attack Heart attack because of our history on third downs. We were good today. As far as drafting Ponder, I watched a lot of him at Florida State. I never thought he would do as good as he has in the NFL. I really figured he would be lucky to be a back up. He seems to run hot and cold...
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SharkHawk
|
Post subject: Re: wow.... we held Ponder to 63 YARDS Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:05 pm |
|
| * NET Alumni * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:47 am Posts: 3474
|
Rat wrote: Pfft, 63 yards. The Cards held him to 58. Our defense blows.
In all seriousness, I can't remember anyone who wanted to use a first round pick on Ponder. Some thought he might be a decent 2nd round choice, but that was one of the bigger WTF type picks of recent years, along with Bruce Irvin and Tyson Alualu. A whole slew of the members of this board wanted him. They were so peeved that at least one said he was going to vote for another team. Just as a member of this board said he was leaving the board and was now a Browns fan because they were "smart enough" to draft Brandon Weeden.
_________________  R.I.P. Dad. I miss you. You will never be forgotten 1/12/39 - 8/7/08
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Re: wow.... we held Ponder to 63 YARDS Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 6:08 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm Posts: 5194 Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
SharkHawk wrote: Rat wrote: Pfft, 63 yards. The Cards held him to 58. Our defense blows.
In all seriousness, I can't remember anyone who wanted to use a first round pick on Ponder. Some thought he might be a decent 2nd round choice, but that was one of the bigger WTF type picks of recent years, along with Bruce Irvin and Tyson Alualu. A whole slew of the members of this board wanted him. They were so peeved that at least one said he was going to vote for another team. Just as a member of this board said he was leaving the board and was now a Browns fan because they were "smart enough" to draft Brandon Weeden. lol
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
seahawk2k
|
Post subject: Re: wow.... we held Ponder to 63 YARDS Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 6:12 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:41 pm Posts: 953
|
|
He's real hot and cold, and when he's cold, he's scott mitchell cold. Very limited, but can be pretty lethal when he's "on". Today, he wasn't on. I thought they should've fed AP the rock more, but I'm not complaining.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Tech Worlds
|
Post subject: Re: wow.... we held Ponder to 63 YARDS Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 6:13 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:40 am Posts: 6952 Location: Granite Falls, WA
|
|
I am sure glad they quit running Peterson and tried to beat us with Ponder.
I honestly don't know why.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
T-Sizzle
|
Post subject: Re: wow.... we held Ponder to 63 YARDS Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 6:14 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:14 am Posts: 1150
|
SharkHawk wrote: Rat wrote: Pfft, 63 yards. The Cards held him to 58. Our defense blows.
In all seriousness, I can't remember anyone who wanted to use a first round pick on Ponder. Some thought he might be a decent 2nd round choice, but that was one of the bigger WTF type picks of recent years, along with Bruce Irvin and Tyson Alualu. A whole slew of the members of this board wanted him. They were so peeved that at least one said he was going to vote for another team. Just as a member of this board said he was leaving the board and was now a Browns fan because they were "smart enough" to draft Brandon Weeden. Thank god for Pete and John
_________________ "??? How do you know he's awful? We've seen the guy play 2 regular season games." -SoulfishHawk "16 starts in 9 years is all you need to know." - Tsizzle "OMFG! LOL! Are you for real?"  -ivotuk
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Sports Hernia
|
Post subject: Re: wow.... we held Ponder to 63 YARDS Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 6:15 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:36 pm Posts: 5519
|
Ponder is too short, thats his problem. 
_________________ Hugh Millen = CBJ minus the cool beard
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawk45
|
Post subject: Re: wow.... we held Ponder to 63 YARDS Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 6:16 pm |
|
| *GOLD SUPPORTER* |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 1:08 pm Posts: 2569
|
|
Our secondary played well but I don't think Ponder was much of a challenge. The real challenge today, AP, kicked our butts. If their OC doesn't get amnesia at halftime and forget his running back racked up close to 200 yards in the first half who knows how many more AP gets.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 18 posts ] |
|
Users browsing this forum: acbass, AKSeahawker, akula, AVL, Bill Assumpcao, BlueTalon, ClumsyLurk, dbmack, Dismas, FlyingGreg, FormerEvil, geoff21, Google [Bot], GreenHawk, Hawkfish, Hawks46, IronSaint, Jville, Meeker, misfit, Mistashoesta, noflyzone, otter, phpasion, rj503, seahawks-in-qc, seahawksTopGear, Seahwkgal, Seeker, SmokeyHawk, Stephen SeaHawking, The Outfield, TLD0550, tyshawkfan, Veilside, zelter and 161 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |