Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate  Chat Room

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: I think BEVEL might take the fall
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 1:32 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 4:38 pm
Posts: 2262
Smoke wrote:
Yes Wr's dropping the ball 5 times was one thing to contend with....<BR nodeIndex="1"><BR nodeIndex="2">But holy lord, running 9 times in a row is BS.<BR nodeIndex="3"><BR nodeIndex="4"><BR nodeIndex="5">Crappy crosses that net 5 yards on 3rd and 12 is pure crapfest. Lets pass the first 2 downs more than one time per game, please


We complained when the running game was working and we chose to pass instead of run
Run 9 times in a row and it does 2 things, sets up PA, and makes the defense think you're going to set up PA, so they won't overcommit to the run.

My question is, just what the hell has happened to Tate? I'd give him a pass for one off game, but this is a guy who didn't drop a single ball last year, and known for making ridiculous fingertip catches etc. Why has he dropped so many balls not just against SF, but all season?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I think BEVEL might take the fall
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 5:34 am 
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 1:08 pm
Posts: 4649
Hey why not run it 9 times in a row. Putting it in the air is just prelude to having it go through the hands of the receiver or back so hell with it.

I can't begin to evaluate Bevell or the QB play when we have one entire facet of the offense (catching the ball) completely nonexistent for an entire game.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I think BEVEL might take the fall
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 5:36 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 12:29 pm
Posts: 1827
SacHawk2.0 wrote:
I think the WR's coach needs to get his guys on a jug machine.


That's funny because of your avatar.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I think BEVEL might take the fall
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:21 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 2:12 pm
Posts: 850
Yeah, the Tate drop on the slant was a real bummer. It's the kind of thing that makes play callers just not call that -- it was a perfectly thrown ball against OK defense, nothing stellar, and he just didn't haul it in.

(The other four drops were terrible, too, it's hard to pick which one I hated the most, actually.)


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I think BEVEL might take the fall
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:27 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:29 pm
Posts: 1990
Location: Seattle
Bevel can't catch passes for the receivers. There were 5 drops that I saw were very catchable and should have been caught. You simply CANNOT have that many drops in a game and expect to win. They were momentum killers. I don't know how you can catch a game winning 40 yard bomb one game, then drop an easy 10 yarder the next.

_________________
~ The Stache'


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I think BEVEL might take the fall
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:37 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:57 am
Posts: 2742
Zowert wrote:
Bevel can't catch passes for the receivers. There were 5 drops that I saw were very catchable and should have been caught. You simply CANNOT have that many drops in a game and expect to win. They were momentum killers. I don't know how you can catch a game winning 40 yard bomb one game, then drop an easy 10 yarder the next.


:13: If our players catch those balls, Bevell looks like a genius. Because they didn't hes the goat.

_________________
Give me some damn skittles...


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I think BEVEL might take the fall
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 10:33 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:00 pm
Posts: 1363
Not exactly all about receivers catching the ball. I thought the overall play calling in the second half was atrocious- drop by Tate on the slant aside.

_________________
Image

"We all we got, we all we need"


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ] 

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]



 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.