| Author |
Message |
|
MontanaHawk05
|
Post subject: DVOA upgrades Seattle to #2 defense  Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 6:52 pm |
|
| * 17Power Blogger * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 9704
|
_________________ GO HAWKS!!! Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!Follow me on Twitter at @17power
Last edited by MontanaHawk05 on Tue Oct 16, 2012 6:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
Maelstrom787
|
Post subject: Re: DVOA upgrades Seattle to #2 defense Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 6:58 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 1252
Location: Delaware
|
|
We're 7th in total efficiency.
Gentlemen, we're badass, so far.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
12th_Bob
|
Post subject: Re: DVOA upgrades Seattle to #2 defense Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 7:27 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 7:56 pm
Posts: 1062
|
#1 in home field advantage and #1 in trash talk.  Oh yeah! One of the best defensive teams I've ever seen considering starting a rookie and the murders row of QB's we have had to play so far.
_________________
NFL, all your Owlz are belong to us!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
TalonHawk
|
Post subject: Re: DVOA upgrades Seattle to #2 defense Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 7:43 pm |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2012 10:15 am
Posts: 47
|
|
I love rooting/representing these guys. We all we got, We all we need!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
kearly
|
Post subject: Re: DVOA upgrades Seattle to #2 defense Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:38 am |
|
| * Mr Random Thought * |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am
Posts: 7234
|
|
Seems strange that our defense would go up after giving up almost 500 yards. Even to an elite offense, that's a long day. I'm guessing it's because DVOA is more concerned about efficiency, and on a per attempt basis, Brady actually had a below average game compared to the rest of the season.
_________________  "I believe there’s merit to the idea that once something in life becomes conventional, it’s no longer the safest path to success." -Matt Waldman "If everyone's thinking alike, no one's thinking." -Bill Walsh
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Kelly.Orr
|
Post subject: Re: DVOA upgrades Seattle to #2 defense Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:58 am |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:37 pm
Posts: 311
|
|
I was very worried after the first half. Sucks i couldn't watch but saw what i could on gamecast. Sherm and Earl don't get those ints its a different ball game. The adjustments and plays made by the defense and offense in the second half were great. Hopefully this is just the start of a long winning future which i think is coming. I just hope we can keep all these guys in the future although doubtful =(.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BigMeach
|
Post subject: Re: DVOA upgrades Seattle to #2 defense Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:04 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 12:11 am
Posts: 249
|
|
Well we definately will not be able to keep everyone forever but the fact that we are able to find all this talent so well I'm quite confident that as we lose guys we will find replacements to keep us solid.
_________________
"Know thy self, know thy enemy. A thousand battles, a thousand victories." - Sun Tzu
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Navyhawkfan187
|
Post subject: Re: DVOA upgrades Seattle to #2 defense Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 5:17 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 12:48 am
Posts: 504
|
Kelly.Orr wrote: I was very worried after the first half. Sucks i couldn't watch but saw what i could on gamecast. Sherm and Earl don't get those ints its a different ball game. The adjustments and plays made by the defense and offense in the second half were great. Hopefully this is just the start of a long winning future which i think is coming. I just hope we can keep all these guys in the future although doubtful =(. If Earl Thomas doesn't drop 2 other INT's including one that was a sure fire 6 points the game would have been completely different as well.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
jlwaters1
|
Post subject: Re: DVOA upgrades Seattle to #2 defense Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 6:57 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:48 pm
Posts: 1894
|
Navyhawkfan187 wrote: Kelly.Orr wrote: I was very worried after the first half. Sucks i couldn't watch but saw what i could on gamecast. Sherm and Earl don't get those ints its a different ball game. The adjustments and plays made by the defense and offense in the second half were great. Hopefully this is just the start of a long winning future which i think is coming. I just hope we can keep all these guys in the future although doubtful =(. If Earl Thomas doesn't drop 2 other INT's including one that was a sure fire 6 points the game would have been completely different as well. I don't see where everyone is convinced that Earl would have had a pick 6 on that first INT he dropped. He fell down on the play, so even if he caught it he most likely goes to the ground and then get's tackles shortly after getting up. Though I wished he would have caught it.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
-The Glove-
|
Post subject: Re: DVOA upgrades Seattle to #2 defense Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 7:12 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 am
Posts: 2761
|
Navyhawkfan187 wrote: Kelly.Orr wrote: I was very worried after the first half. Sucks i couldn't watch but saw what i could on gamecast. Sherm and Earl don't get those ints its a different ball game. The adjustments and plays made by the defense and offense in the second half were great. Hopefully this is just the start of a long winning future which i think is coming. I just hope we can keep all these guys in the future although doubtful =(. If Earl Thomas doesn't drop 2 other INT's including one that was a sure fire 6 points the game would have been completely different as well. I think he falls down because he dropped it. He jumped a little for it and it hit him right where it was supposed to. Clear pick 6 to me.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
  |
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 10 posts ] |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
