 |
  |
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 19 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Largent80
|
Post subject: Why Don't We  Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 6:37 am |
|
| NET Pro Bowler |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm
Posts: 18751
Location: .Net is full of Postradamuses
|
|
Use the no-huddle against them in return?
I mean, we have practiced this all week against our defense. I'm quite sure N.E. has not seen much of it in a game situation and our offense could use this as another weapon.
Just Sayin'.
_________________ 
|
|
  |
|
|
|
hawkfan333
|
Post subject: Re: Why Don't We Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 6:41 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 5:58 pm
Posts: 276
|
|
the ravens ran it against them and it was one of their losses i believe. but i dont know that our team is really set up for it
|
|
| |
|
|
|
FlyingGreg
|
Post subject: Re: Why Don't We Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 6:43 am |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
Posts: 7138
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
|
|
Might be too much for the rookie to pull off at this point. Being able to run a no huddle takes awhile to build.
_________________ @SeahawkGreg "I will be thrilled with 10 wins.... If we win 14 games, I will tattoo my nuts green and blue!" -- 13thMan
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Largent80
|
Post subject: Re: Why Don't We Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 6:46 am |
|
| NET Pro Bowler |
|
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm
Posts: 18751
Location: .Net is full of Postradamuses
|
|
I'm pretty sure they have practiced it for the 2 minute drill, but as you say RW already has a lot on his young plate.
_________________
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BillyD0123
|
Post subject: Re: Why Don't We Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 7:00 am |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 10:37 am
Posts: 7
|
Largent80 wrote: Use the no-huddle against them in return?
I mean, we have practiced this all week against our defense. I'm quite sure N.E. has not seen much of it in a game situation and our offense could use this as another weapon.
Just Sayin'. Like Doc Holiday said in Tomestone " by all means please do" Eh, it was something like that. I don't think this is a game where the Hawks want to experiment.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
knownone
|
Post subject: Re: Why Don't We Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 7:02 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 11:10 pm
Posts: 777
|
|
We want to control the clock, to keep our defense rested. No huddle is a bad idea.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Largent80
|
Post subject: Re: Why Don't We Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 7:03 am |
|
| NET Pro Bowler |
|
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm
Posts: 18751
Location: .Net is full of Postradamuses
|
|
Not saying run it for the whole game. But keep them off balance by running it at certain times.
_________________
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BillyD0123
|
Post subject: Re: Why Don't We Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 7:26 am |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 10:37 am
Posts: 7
|
knownone wrote: We want to control the clock, to keep our defense rested. No huddle is a bad idea. If you know BB he'll concentrate on stopping the Hawks running game until the show they're a real threat in the passing game. Regardless, the Hawks aren't explosive in the point scoring game. With all due respect for Seattle, their D will look good in a losing effort.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
The Radish
|
Post subject: Re: Why Don't We Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 7:53 am |
|
| * NET Radish * |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:18 pm
Posts: 16766
Location: Spokane, Wa.
|
I think the team needs to concentrate on what works for them, not what works for the Pats.  _________________  Ok, our old ones fell to 11-2. So its time for a new updated pair.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ImTheScientist
|
Post subject: Re: Why Don't We Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 8:22 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:14 am
Posts: 1748
|
|
It's easy to say "just go no huddle on them" much more difficult to do. It would be a bad idea as others have said....ball control and keep the d fresh.
_________________
The artist formerly known as T-Sizzle
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Tech Worlds
|
Post subject: Re: Why Don't We Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 8:25 am |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:40 am
Posts: 8688
Location: Granite Falls, WA
|
|
They have a great qb.
Us not so much.
Maybe some day.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
morgulon1
|
Post subject: Re: Why Don't We Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 8:25 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 10:07 am
Posts: 3225
Location: Spokane, Wa
|
Largent80 wrote: Use the no-huddle against them in return?
I mean, we have practiced this all week against our defense. I'm quite sure N.E. has not seen much of it in a game situation and our offense could use this as another weapon.
Just Sayin'. I thought you were going to say..... get drunk and screw.(jimmy Buffett?)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
sutz
|
Post subject: Re: Why Don't We Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 8:47 am |
|
| USMC 1970-77 |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:41 am
Posts: 8648
Location: Monroe, WA
|
Well, I'd like to open up with play action. We're known as a 'running' team, so first snap, fake the hand off and hit Tate on a go route. Hey, it already worked once, except for that stupid penalty on Giac. We do need a definite  moment to get them on their heels. 
_________________
Talent can get you to the playoffs.
It takes character to win when you get there.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Largent80
|
Post subject: Re: Why Don't We Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 8:49 am |
|
| NET Pro Bowler |
|
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm
Posts: 18751
Location: .Net is full of Postradamuses
|
|
I hate that stupid quick "out route" to the WR that takes a step back then catches it. Usually for no gain and a few times a backward pass resulted. Scrap that play please.
_________________
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BGHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Why Don't We Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 8:59 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 7:32 am
Posts: 628
Location: Battleground,WA
|
Largent80 wrote: I hate that stupid quick "out route" to the WR that takes a step back then catches it. Usually for no gain and a few times a backward pass resulted. Scrap that play please. I know right..IF they try this again,..please do it right and use a screen to give the reciever a half of chance...sheesh
|
|
| |
|
|
|
sutz
|
Post subject: Re: Why Don't We Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 9:27 am |
|
| USMC 1970-77 |
|
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:41 am
Posts: 8648
Location: Monroe, WA
|
Largent80 wrote: I hate that stupid quick "out route" to the WR that takes a step back then catches it. Usually for no gain and a few times a backward pass resulted. Scrap that play please. I wouldn't scrap it. It can be very effective, especially for someone like Tate who has great open field running capability. I'd use it judiciously, but if we have a 3 on 2 or a 2 on 1 where the safety help is too far off, I'd definitely give it a try. Or you bring the motion guy over just in time to crack down on the corner to try and break the WR free. There are variations, and again, Tate is a great threat in the open like that. I like that we finally have players that can pull that one off.
_________________
Talent can get you to the playoffs.
It takes character to win when you get there.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Seeker
|
Post subject: Re: Why Don't We Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:12 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:21 pm
Posts: 864
|
Tech Worlds wrote: They have a great qb.
Us not so much.
Maybe some day. The one time Tarvaris Jackson looked good was during no huddle. with this team
|
|
| |
|
|
|
The Radish
|
Post subject: Re: Why Don't We Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:14 am |
|
| * NET Radish * |
|
|
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:18 pm
Posts: 16766
Location: Spokane, Wa.
|
morgulon1 wrote: Largent80 wrote: Use the no-huddle against them in return?
I mean, we have practiced this all week against our defense. I'm quite sure N.E. has not seen much of it in a game situation and our offense could use this as another weapon.
Just Sayin'. I thought you were going to say..... get drunk and screw.(jimmy Buffett?) Sharks on the left, sharks on the right _________________ Ok, our old ones fell to 11-2. So its time for a new updated pair.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SalishHawkFan
|
Post subject: Re: Why Don't We Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 11:26 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 3701
|
|
Wilson has actually played much better in the two minute drill than at any other time during the game. Going no huddle takes away Pete's ability to keep training wheels on the rookie. He'll make mistakes, for sure, but it plays to his strengths as well. When you consider that with our Defense, most picks result in 3 points, not 6, if he gains a TD for every two picks it's a winning proposition. Since I seriously doubt his TD to INT ratio would climb that fast just because we went to a no huddle, and in fact, he plays better in the 2 minute drill than at any other time, I believe the risk to reward factor makes it a very intriguing idea.
But the fact that it takes Petes ability to keep training wheels on Wilson makes me believe that they'll never do it.
_________________
Richard Sherman doesn't just wanna get in your head, he wants to build a vacation home there.
R. Sherman: "I don't want to be an island. I want to be a tourist attraction. You come, I take your money & you go."
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 19 posts ] |
|
Users browsing this forum: 12thMan1, 98pack_09hawks, 9ersfaninNY, AbsolutNET, Ad Hawk, AVL, benthebeerman, Bill Assumpcao, BlueTalons, BlueThunder, Brass-Knuckles, brendonkuhn, BroncosFan, CANHawk, chawx, chevelle03, Clayfighter, coorslighthawk, CortezKennedyfan, Cruser74, Drazzaz, dunceface, Filydan, gargantual, Google [Bot], Greenhell, gtcotcakya, HawkAroundTheClock, hawkfan1975, hawkfannj, Hawkintent, HawkMeat, Hawknballs, hawksfansinceday1, Hawk_Nation, hotroute101, hoxrox, IBleedBlueAndGreen, IcedHawk, iigakusei, ivotuk, jblaze, Jeremy517, JGfromtheNW, jhoeHawk, jlaff35, kf3339, Kixkahn, Kooshster, ktd5440, Largent80, Magic823, ManBunts, MidwestHawker, mikeak, Mindsink, misTer, Morpheus08, mrblitz, NinerBuff, Ninerg, NJHawksFan, norcalhawk, NorCalHawk12, nsport, nyc-seahawk, Oakhawk, onanygivensunday, oregonhawkfan, OreIdahawk, OrFan, Pandion Haliaetus, Plainshawk, Polaris, RampagingMice, razgriz737, rjas77, Sarlacc83, scakfan, SeaChickN, seahawk12thman, Seahawkfaninvegas, seahawks08, seahawksny, Seahwkgal, SeaMeat, seedhawk, Sgt. Largent, Shaz, Smellyman, Snakeeyes007, SoCalHawk, SonicHawk, SoulfishHawk, Sprfunk, SwissCheese77, T-HAWK72, Taehwk, TDBinOLY, tdlabrie, thecycle, theENGLISHseahawk, therealjohncarlson, TJH, Tokadub, TorontoHawk, Treefiddy, TwistedHusky, twisted_steel2, Veilside, vigilantgrrl, VivaEfrenHerrera, Vpk0718, Wartooth, Wee-Bey, zack803, Zebulon Dak and 356 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
