 |
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 3 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
seahawks-in-qc
|
Post subject: Next game substitutions Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:53 am |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
 |
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:23 am Posts: 27
|
|
Hey,
I wonder since we play with so many substitutions on the D-Line how Gus Bradley will deal with that?
Do you prefer if he gives more snap to Irvin since Pats are a pass first offense? (even tough they have 162 rushing yards/game).
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
gtcotcakya
|
Post subject: Re: Next game substitutions Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:58 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 10:52 am Posts: 165
|
|
I heard speculation that they'd have defenses called ahead based on the outcome of each play (e.g. incompletion). Probably not a perfect solution but it theoretically enables you to get people on/off the field as quickly as the refs can get the ball spotted.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
cdallan
|
Post subject: Re: Next game substitutions Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 10:31 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 1:08 am Posts: 525 Location: Scotland
|
|
I've been thinking about this a fair deal, and this is a really difficult game to call on D. Assuming that both NE TEs are fit, we should see a fair bit of 1 RB, 2 TE, 2 WR formations, yes? So don't we really have to go Nickel as our base D?
If we decide to go Nickel, do we go Big Nickel (with Jeron Johnson or Winston Guy), or Nickel-Nickel with Tru in the slot? Or do you match Browner on one of the TEs? Depends on whether we see a lot of Welker, right? And do we play KJ with Hill, or with Wagner to have more speed on the field? And all of that is before we get to the DL.
FWIW, I would go with Bryant at DE, but replace Branch in our base D with Jones to get some inside pressure and height - the Pats OL may not be that good inside. Then when they are gassed and we get a chance to sub, mix in Irvin and Branch. I would play base Nickel, with KJ and Wagner, and would send out Johnson or Guy if I see both Hernandez and Gronkowski sent out there, and Tru if I see 3 WRs.
Having said all that, we probably end up playing our base 4-3 and I am compleely overthinking things. But this is going to be a really interesting game.
_________________ Machine-wrapped, with butter?
Yes, machine-wrapped, WITH BUTTER
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 3 posts ] |
|
Users browsing this forum: City Of Reign, Deixis, Giedi, Google [Bot], HawkGANG, HawkHack, kearly, mgschwa, MrCarey, nategreat, olyfan63, PDX12, SeahawkFrost, Stephen SeaHawking, TDBinOLY, TheHawkster, Veilside, Wenhawk, wvhawk and 100 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|