Why The Seahawks Will Beat The Patriots

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13
  • PatsFanNH wrote:Barthawk,

    What a USELESS Stat! The broncos were 2-2 but oops not a winning record if they beat the Ravens oops not a winning record team and Titans you got a point.. Oh and both losses were VERY VERY Questionable losses. IE Replacement refs screwed up in both games (esp against AZ.. and the missed Baltimore FG being called good) That isnt gonna happen Sunday.


    Um, bulliisht. I watched that Cardinals game - youre line and offense were manhandled. WTF are you talking about? Then, you got gifted an fumble for a FG try, and still lost.

    The Hawks defensive line is similar, and what the Cards have in height, the Hawks make up for in speed.
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 9924
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


  • PatsFanNH wrote:Barthawk,

    What a USELESS Stat! The broncos were 2-2 but oops not a winning record if they beat the Ravens oops not a winning record team and Titans you got a point.. Oh and both losses were VERY VERY Questionable losses. IE Replacement refs screwed up in both games (esp against AZ.. and the missed Baltimore FG being called good) That isnt gonna happen Sunday.


    The Patriots armor was dented when they lost game 19 of the formerly unbeaten season, and the formula to beat them was set in stone: Physical brutality. Fortunately for the Patriots, the NFL is short on truly nasty squads like that. Now, is that formula foolproof? Nope. But a very physical Ravens team did come within one dropped pass of beating you, and the injuries your team accumulated in that win may very well have cost you the Super Bowl.
    That Cardinals team that beat you at home was another physical team that you could not handle. Will you win Sunday? Quite possibly. Will you get physically outmatched? Most definitely. Our squad is one of the 5 or 6 teams in the league that can win a game using brutality as their primary weapon. Watch your injury report, next week it will have more players on it than this week. If you are crying about questionable calls right now, by next week you will be complaining about uncalled personal fouls.
    SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
    User avatar
    Scottemojo
    *Scott of Smacksville*
    *Scott of Smacksville*
     
    Posts: 10538
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am


  • :1: I'm hungry
    TB12
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 2
    Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:20 pm


  • RolandDeschain wrote:
    aku wrote:And more importantly, where do they buy their koolaid?


    I'm thinking they're spiking it with a little somethin'-somethin' from these guys:

    Image


    They're drug dealers from the most realistic cop-and-drug-trade show to ever air on television, The Wire.


    Awh, I miss Bodie. My favorite charachter from the show (and one of my fav from any tv show) along with Omar.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18498
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


  • The Seahawks are unproven but a up and coming team. It might be tough but will get it done.
    TB12
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 2
    Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:20 pm


  • Scottemojo wrote:
    PatsFanNH wrote:Barthawk,

    What a USELESS Stat! The broncos were 2-2 but oops not a winning record if they beat the Ravens oops not a winning record team and Titans you got a point.. Oh and both losses were VERY VERY Questionable losses. IE Replacement refs screwed up in both games (esp against AZ.. and the missed Baltimore FG being called good) That isnt gonna happen Sunday.


    The Patriots armor was dented when they lost game 19 of the formerly unbeaten season, and the formula to beat them was set in stone: Physical brutality. Fortunately for the Patriots, the NFL is short on truly nasty squads like that. Now, is that formula foolproof? Nope. But a very physical Ravens team did come within one dropped pass of beating you, and the injuries your team accumulated in that win may very well have cost you the Super Bowl.
    That Cardinals team that beat you at home was another physical team that you could not handle. Will you win Sunday? Quite possibly. Will you get physically outmatched? Most definitely. Our squad is one of the 5 or 6 teams in the league that can win a game using brutality as their primary weapon. Watch your injury report, next week it will have more players on it than this week. If you are crying about questionable calls right now, by next week you will be complaining about uncalled personal fouls.


    I think that Cardinals game was the last game like that for them, and they weren't even clicking yet like they are now, and still only lost because of a missed field goal. They have getting past what teams figured out now.
    knowledgeispower
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 6
    Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:42 pm


  • You only got to miss that field goal because the Cadinals fumbled while running out the clock. Greg Schiano's victory formation has more street cred.
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 9924
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


  • Yeah, that fumble is due to the ball being knocked out. Those players are smart and very clutch. You have to play full 60 minutes to even get close to beat them.
    knowledgeispower
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 6
    Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:42 pm


  • Or, a boneheaded Cardinal player? I watched that ENTIRE game, because the Cards beat the Hawks week one. The team that deserved to win won tha Sunday. Saying otherwise is foolish. The Cards went to Foxboro and limited your offense - give them credit they defeated the Patriots.
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 9924
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


  • The point of that "useless" stat was to point out that while the Pats are a good team, they beat up on the sisters of the poor last year and either lost or struggled mightily against good teams..

    The Pats are a good team, but they are definitely beatable and will not have an easy go on Sunday. Seattle is a hungry team that plays exponentially better at home.
    _____________________

    Where can I find Seahawks98.com???
    User avatar
    Barthawk
    *Bacon Eating Crusader*
    *Bacon Eating Crusader*
     
    Posts: 2499
    Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:17 am
    Location: San Antonio, TX by way of Kalispell, MT


  • Aros wrote:For some reason, the Seahawks are nearly unbeatable at home.

    Agreed?

    Sure, there's the one or two games a year where you leave CLink and say "WTF"?

    But 90 percent of the time, the Seahawks beat whomever they are playing in Seattle. At home. Bliss.

    The Patriots are a very, very good AFC team. Tom Brady is a future first-ballot HOF QB.

    However, they are not used to playing in the loudest, most disruptive and intimidating stadium in the NFL.

    After today's performance, the Seahawks may just have the #1 defense in the entire National Football League.

    Think about how SICK our defense will be at home.

    Think about how loud the Power of 12 will be.

    Win.


    Just curious, where the 90% figure comes from. According to this site the hawks are 53-29 all time at the Clink, which works out to around 60 percent of the time. That, in spite of the loudness and noise, does not sound like much of a home field advantage.
    IndianFan
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 47
    Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2011 3:59 pm


  • bestfightstory wrote:I am 5-0 in my last 5 games at Seahawks Stadium.

    MNF vs Peckers
    MNF last year vs Iggles
    Home Opener Last Year vs Cards
    BEASTQUAKE
    Week 17 game vs Rams (the 'Let's NOT Suck For Luck' game)


    Just sayin'.......if anybody has an extra ticket, I wouldn't be a bad place for it to go...

    For the love of GOD!!! Somebody get this man a ticket!!!
    Doug Baldwin does nothing but Save QB's!
    User avatar
    TundraApe
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 500
    Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:39 am


  • IndianFan wrote:
    Aros wrote:For some reason, the Seahawks are nearly unbeatable at home.

    Agreed?

    Sure, there's the one or two games a year where you leave CLink and say "WTF"?

    But 90 percent of the time, the Seahawks beat whomever they are playing in Seattle. At home. Bliss.

    The Patriots are a very, very good AFC team. Tom Brady is a future first-ballot HOF QB.

    However, they are not used to playing in the loudest, most disruptive and intimidating stadium in the NFL.

    After today's performance, the Seahawks may just have the #1 defense in the entire National Football League.

    Think about how SICK our defense will be at home.

    Think about how loud the Power of 12 will be.

    Win.


    Just curious, where the 90% figure comes from. According to this site the hawks are 53-29 all time at the Clink, which works out to around 60 percent of the time. That, in spite of the loudness and noise, does not sound like much of a home field advantage.


    90% is obviously an inflated number but we're really goddam good at home when we're fielding a competitive team. Realistically during the 4-12 and 5-11 type seasons we weren't very good home or not.

    When this team is playing generally well I'll put our home field advantage up against an other team, any other sport.
    Image Image Tanzania¹² Image "ALERT THE LEGION!!!"
    User avatar
    Zebulon Dak
    * The Producer *
    * The Producer *
     
    Posts: 13939
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm
    Location: King In The North


  • There's one recipe for beating the Pats, and that this...punch them in the mouth.

    Physical D, Physical run game
    I cannot imagine a team more over-hyped then this team. It won't be easy, my only fear is being out-coached like we were in STL.
    Image

    "We all we got, we all we need"
    User avatar
    lukerguy
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1409
    Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:00 pm


  • Barthawk wrote:The point of that "useless" stat was to point out that while the Pats are a good team, they beat up on the sisters of the poor last year and either lost or struggled mightily against good teams..

    The Pats are a good team, but they are definitely beatable and will not have an easy go on Sunday. Seattle is a hungry team that plays exponentially better at home.



    Well since LAST year means NADA for this year, This year their 2 losses by a combines 3 points. Now A stat I found her: http://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/takeaways-per-game

    Very interesting Pats averaging ROUGHLY 3 TO a game and Seatle 1 roughly. IMO THIS is what will decide the game whichever teams D wins the TO battle.
    PatsFanNH
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 290
    Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:07 am


  • Interesting tweet from Colin Cowherd, via one of the publishing folks on my feed:

    Angela James ‏@angelajames
    RT @ESPN_Colin: I don't play fantasy football but know many of you do---so a warning--stay away from NE this week. story soon.
    World Champion Seattle Seahawks football. It's an addiction, and there is no cure.
    User avatar
    Seahawk Sailor
    * .NET Navy Bad Ass *
     
    Posts: 18153
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
    Location: The beautiful PNW


  • lukerguy wrote:There's one recipe for beating the Pats, and that this...punch them in the mouth.

    Physical D, Physical run game
    I cannot imagine a team more over-hyped then this team. It won't be easy, my only fear is being out-coached like we were in STL.


    Have you seen any game outside of AZ? because that has not worked matter fact the Pats been the ones laying the smack down (the Ravens game was VERY hard hitting and the Pats Mauled the Bills and Broncos). Now I believe the Seahawks have a very good D, but they have not faced a decent O yet this year (based on this years stats):

    AZ -- 31ST Ranked 0
    Rams -- 29th ranked O
    Carolina -- 22ND Ranked O
    Packers -- 21st Ranked O
    Cowboys -- 16th Ranked O

    Also Fisher < BB as a head coach.. it isnt even close! Looking forward to Sundays game should be a fun game to watch.
    PatsFanNH
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 290
    Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:07 am


  • Seahawk Sailor wrote:Interesting tweet from Colin Cowherd, via one of the publishing folks on my feed:

    Angela James ‏@angelajames
    RT @ESPN_Colin: I don't play fantasy football but know many of you do---so a warning--stay away from NE this week. story soon.


    Not that anyone cares, but Stevan Ridley is riding the pine on my team this week.
    Super Bowl Champions XVLIII
    User avatar
    Sarlacc83
    * NET Philistine *
     
    Posts: 14373
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
    Location: Portland, OR


  • Sarlacc83 wrote:
    Seahawk Sailor wrote:Interesting tweet from Colin Cowherd, via one of the publishing folks on my feed:

    Angela James ‏@angelajames
    RT @ESPN_Colin: I don't play fantasy football but know many of you do---so a warning--stay away from NE this week. story soon.


    Not that anyone cares, but Stevan Ridley is riding the pine on my team this week.



    Dont forget to put him back in for the Jets game the following week or you will be kicking yourself.
    PatsFanNH
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 290
    Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:07 am


  • Here's an interesting tidbit:

    Liz Mathews 710 ESPN ‏@Liz_Mathews
    Per ESPN STATS: Pats have lowest three-and-out percentage (5%) in NFL this season. #Seahawks have best rate in NFL for forcing at 31.5%.


    Something's got to give.
    World Champion Seattle Seahawks football. It's an addiction, and there is no cure.
    User avatar
    Seahawk Sailor
    * .NET Navy Bad Ass *
     
    Posts: 18153
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
    Location: The beautiful PNW


  • PatsFanNH wrote:Now I believe the Seahawks have a very good D, but they have not faced a decent O yet this year (based on this years stats):

    AZ -- 31ST Ranked 0
    Rams -- 29th ranked O
    Carolina -- 22ND Ranked O
    Packers -- 21st Ranked O
    Cowboys -- 16th Ranked O


    Are you struggling with the cause/effect relationship of playing a team with an excellent defense? Cause: Unable to move/score against defense. Effect: Lower offensive ranking.

    The commonality between all 5 of those teams is they played 1/5 of their games against the Seahawks' defense.

    A simplistic model of cause/effect is that after week 1, every team that was 1-0 got there by winning against a losing team.

    Statistics without context are completely meaningless.
    KiwiHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1259
    Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 3:22 pm
    Location: Auckland, New Zealand


  • Well said Kiwi.

    Pats fans should be sharting themselves. Their beloved offense is going to get the shit knocked out of 'em.

    /drinks another Makers Mark

    GO HAWKS!
    "it'd be a newborn deer" - pehawk
    User avatar
    Hawk Strap
    * Handsome *
     
    Posts: 2938
    Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 3:37 pm
    Location: Tri Cities, WA


  • I think the Pats fans in this thread have been pretty sane, but IMHO - we will win this game.

    Some intangibles and observations on the Patriots:
    - No doubt Tom Brady is a great player. Having an icon who is still in their prime is a huge asset.
    - The head coach has proven he is a very good schemer. He has the rings to prove it.
    - Having a WR that creates matchup problems (Welker)is usually an advantage; albeit he's shrimpy - he's quick and deceptively good
    - Having a man-beast for a TE (Gronk) who is in the fabric of the offense is a major advantage - again - major matchup props to NE for exploiting him against other teams
    - There is definitely, without question, a young defense anchored by a few really good players - based on the amount of points they give up - they have a lot of maturing to do.
    - Aside from Brandon Lloyd and Welker, can you name another WR on that team? Not really... Lloyd has been targeted 45 times, but apparently does not convert well - catching 28 of those 45 passes. The bulk came in two games and has not been impactive... still searching for that other WR? Edelman and Branch only contribute to 111 yards of catches in 5 games.
    - Ridley is a good story - that's because he's racking up yards against "quality defenses" like the Titans, Bills, and Broncos. He did little against Baltimore or Arizona.

    On our side -
    - While it's not a real true "talent on the field advantage" - us at home is a big deal. I don't care what anyone says. This stadium rocks.
    - Our defense dictates where the ball can go - by that I mean the WR's might as well take the day off if they are going to line-up across from Sherman and Browner.
    - Our running game is VERY GOOD. We don't pretend to be a running team like the Patriots. We ARE a running team.
    - We have a rookie QB - but IMHO, he's every bit as good as any QB we've had since 2007. The last semi-decent year for Hasselbeck. At least RW has proven he can throw a ball in the air more than 30 yards - and if not a holding call last week, would have shown against a similar caliber defense what he can do with a deep ball.

    Why I think we will win this game:
    - With Seattle CB's funneling everything inside the numbers, we are basically playing with a 2 man advantage. Where most safeties are concerned about rotations and coverage handoffs, we don't do that typically.
    - I don't think you stop Welker and Gronk. I think you force situations that remove them from the big play opportunity. For Welker, when he lines up, take something from him, whether it be the inside route or the out pattern. When he's on the LOS, bust him hard. When he's off, bracket so Brady has to look elsewhere. For Gronk, be good enough on the DL that he's spending more snaps at the LOS. When he's out in coverage, know where he is and force a perfect throw. Sounds easy to say, harder to do - but we have some of the best DB personnel in the game to get it done. Whatever we do - no LB's in coverage on Gronk. I say bring the safety down.
    - Our DL stops the run on 1st and 2nd down.
    - Our DL and safety help makes it very hard to convert on 3rd down. Safeties coming down to help LB's and the maddening rush from the DE positions really rattle other teams
    - Our running game should be good for 5 YPC on Sunday. We are not the Cardinals. We are not the Ravens (who interestingly thinks they are a passing team this year). We run the ball. And we keep running it.
    - I sincerely doubt that this game goes anywhere due to turnovers on RW. If something happens - it will be a fluke.
    - Weather will be a factor. I think may benefit us in the running game.
    - The TOP stat will be won by the Hawks.
    - Can't argue we have a great kicking game to go along with the D and weather for Sunday.
    - NE will no doubt try to exploit their advantages mentioned prior - I think they will, but just not enough to matter.
    Image
    User avatar
    nsport
    * NET Sports Handicapper *
     
    Posts: 1416
    Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:13 am


  • You guys are basing fantasy against facts. There is no way Seattle wins this game. There is no way the Hawks compete in this game. They have not played an offense like they will be seeing on Sunday and yes Lynch is a VG back and can run, and when the Hawks are down 21-0 feel free to run it all day. Pats control the tempo of the games they play. The Seahawks offense is pathetic, sure Wilson will get some garbage time 20-20 stats, thats what the Pats let teams do!

    But seriously these stats are stupid the Hawks are not in the same league as the Pats. Enjoy your Super Bowl.
    GoPeteGo!
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 3
    Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:40 am


  • And honestly if I see one more comment about the weather I'm going to snap, they are the NEW ENGLAND Patriots, do you REALLY thing a little wind or rain is going to bother them??? They put up almost 60 in a snow storm Oh no its 60 and drizzling our Seahawks have an advantage!

    Pathetic
    GoPeteGo!
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 3
    Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:40 am


  • GoPeteGo! wrote:You guys are basing fantasy against facts. There is no way Seattle wins this game. There is no way the Hawks compete in this game. They have not played an offense like they will be seeing on Sunday and yes Lynch is a VG back and can run, and when the Hawks are down 21-0 feel free to run it all day. Pats control the tempo of the games they play. The Seahawks offense is pathetic, sure Wilson will get some garbage time 20-20 stats, thats what the Pats let teams do!

    But seriously these stats are stupid the Hawks are not in the same league as the Pats. Enjoy your Super Bowl.



    You're not going to get very far here commenting like this.
    Happybelly
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 91
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:09 am


  • Annnnnnnd, there goes our streak of intelligent, friendly Patriots fans on our board. Good work tossing a hand grenade in the barrel to lower the overall perception of your fellow fans, GoPeteGo.
    Rams bet status: honored. Bradford still sucks.
    RedAlice is right.
    "VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama
    User avatar
    RolandDeschain
    *NET FCC Liaison*
     
    Posts: 24097
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
    Location: Kirkland, WA


  • GoPeteGo! wrote:You guys are basing fantasy against facts. There is no way Seattle wins this game. There is no way the Hawks compete in this game. They have not played an offense like they will be seeing on Sunday and yes Lynch is a VG back and can run, and when the Hawks are down 21-0 feel free to run it all day. Pats control the tempo of the games they play. The Seahawks offense is pathetic, sure Wilson will get some garbage time 20-20 stats, thats what the Pats let teams do!

    But seriously these stats are stupid the Hawks are not in the same league as the Pats. Enjoy your Super Bowl.


    Yeah! Hey! Good talk.
    Image Image Tanzania¹² Image "ALERT THE LEGION!!!"
    User avatar
    Zebulon Dak
    * The Producer *
    * The Producer *
     
    Posts: 13939
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm
    Location: King In The North


  • GoPeteGo! wrote:You guys are basing fantasy against facts. There is no way Seattle wins this game. There is no way the Hawks compete in this game. They have not played an offense like they will be seeing on Sunday and yes Lynch is a VG back and can run, and when the Hawks are down 21-0 feel free to run it all day. Pats control the tempo of the games they play. The Seahawks offense is pathetic, sure Wilson will get some garbage time 20-20 stats, thats what the Pats let teams do!

    But seriously these stats are stupid the Hawks are not in the same league as the Pats. Enjoy your Super Bowl.


    I like this guy... Stick around after the game, pal! You know what? Hell, lets skip all this the small talk. How's about you marry my daughter?
    Image
    User avatar
    chawx
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1055
    Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 7:47 am
    Location: Salt Lake City, UT


  • RolandDeschain wrote:Annnnnnnd, there goes our streak of intelligent, friendly Patriots fans on our board. Good work tossing a hand grenade in the barrel to lower the overall perception of your fellow fans, GoPeteGo.



    FIRST Let me apologize for go pete go,he is a rather new fan circa 2001. (If you know what I mean.)

    That said nice points on the Patsby a previous posterI would like to add a few reasons whyI think the Pats will win:

    1. Pats D has given up points to Flacco that was the only true shoot out. Against AZ they scored 10 points directly from TO (blocked punt and Brady Int) On one of those TO the cards LOST yards but still got a FG.. Against Buffalo the Pats were up Big and they got GARBAGE time points. Against Manning the Pats were up 24 in the 4th and went to the gawd awful Prevent D and allowed 2 TD in the 4th quarter before nailing the door shut with a TO. Oh and I think Wilson has promise but he is NO Flacco or Manning. Not even close right now. Your O will struggle to move the ball, it has all year and the Pats D is better than you think and more DANGEROUS when it comes to takeaways than ANY team you have meet yet. I see at least 2 TO by your O which IMO will be the big difference in the game.

    2. Pats O is a veteran O built scarily enough to exploit what people on here have called the D biggest weakness, The underneath stuff with threats on the Outside when hernandez splits out wide with Lloyd so you will have keep your best corners on them. I know you have good safeties but they have not faced a TE like Gronk, why? because there is NO TE like Gronk in the NFL, add in whoever is covering Welker in for a nightmare as he IMO is the best slot WR in the nfl.

    3. Our Head Coach WILL make the Hawks do things on O they do NOT want to do.. AKA throw the Football by eliminating your RB significantly. 9Oh you will get an occassional good run, but IF I am correct I see at least ONE strip sac of Wilson deep in your territory that either directly leads to a Defensive TD or an easy TD for the O.

    3. Home Field is a HUGE Advantage for the Hawks, but noise has never effected the Pats O in the Past and they have been in ROCKING stadiums in the playoffs.
    PatsFanNH
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 290
    Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:07 am


  • GoPeteGo! wrote:And honestly if I see one more comment about the weather I'm going to snap, they are the NEW ENGLAND Patriots, do you REALLY thing a little wind or rain is going to bother them??? They put up almost 60 in a snow storm Oh no its 60 and drizzling our Seahawks have an advantage!

    Pathetic



    STOP! You sound like a 12 yr old little boy! You are a guest on their board show a little respect. Ok to disagree with them (I do) but be respectful about it. sheesh didnt your mama teach you manners and how to act in someone elses house?
    PatsFanNH
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 290
    Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:07 am


  • I agree with PatsFanNH, we are guests and therefore must act accordingly. I too apologize for my fellow Patriot's fan behavior.

    *goes to the back to give GoPeteGo pounds and a wink*

    :)
    PatsFan0X
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 6
    Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 6:21 am


  • Don't worry; we have a few knuckledraggers here too. It happens. Mostly we just throw them occasional peanuts and watch them spank themselves and fling poo.

    PatsFanNH, you bring up some good points. I've watched and/or followed the Pats games this season, and you guys are good, no doubt about it. Your offense vs. our defense will be awesome to watch, even for non-fans of either team. The big question, and the key to the game, as you've stated is our offense vs. your defense. That's where the difference is going to be made. Brady will get his share of points. Our defense will take their share of points away. But the key is moving the ball effectively against your defense and scoring. If we control the score, keep it low and close, it allows us to continue with the run game, and thus control the pace and tempo of the game. If we give up too many points too soon, it's going to be a tough hole to crawl out of.

    The weather is going to be nasty. Both teams are northern teams; both teams are outdoor teams. The rain could dampen the crowd, but I think that happens only if the Pats are up big before halftime. Otherwise, it's going to be a long, miserable day in the trenches for both teams, and the nastiest, most bruising team is going to take it.
    World Champion Seattle Seahawks football. It's an addiction, and there is no cure.
    User avatar
    Seahawk Sailor
    * .NET Navy Bad Ass *
     
    Posts: 18153
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
    Location: The beautiful PNW


  • I hate to say it in this thread, but is anyone getting a worse feeling about this game as the week progresses? For some reason I've got the heebie-jeebies today.
    Super Bowl Champions XVLIII
    User avatar
    Sarlacc83
    * NET Philistine *
     
    Posts: 14373
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
    Location: Portland, OR


  • Sarlacc83 wrote:I hate to say it in this thread, but is anyone getting a worse feeling about this game as the week progresses? For some reason I've got the heebie-jeebies today.


    A little Sarlacc. I really hope we are not over thinking things. This defense plays its best man to man, straight up smash mouth. I hope we dont try to get too cute.
    "it'd be a newborn deer" - pehawk
    User avatar
    Hawk Strap
    * Handsome *
     
    Posts: 2938
    Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 3:37 pm
    Location: Tri Cities, WA


  • Sarlacc83 wrote:I hate to say it in this thread, but is anyone getting a worse feeling about this game as the week progresses? For some reason I've got the heebie-jeebies today.


    Not really. I've thought this would be tough game, but a winnable game if the defense continues to play up to its potential and the offense continues to make some strides. That said, a loss wouldn't surprise me, either. The Pats haven't become one of the league's elite teams by accident (unless the accident you refer to is Bryan Cox nearly killing Bledsoe). I guess you could call my mood "cautiously hopeful, but realistic."
    Image

    Super Bowl XLVIII Champions
    User avatar
    volsunghawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 7901
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
    Location: Right outside Richard Sherman's house


  • Evidently there's some thought we're going to at least hold our own in the game.

    Brian Nemhauser ‏@hawkblogger
    TeamRankings also has the Seahawks covering the spread (4.5 pts), so they expect a close game: http://www.teamrankings.com/nfl-ats-picks/
    World Champion Seattle Seahawks football. It's an addiction, and there is no cure.
    User avatar
    Seahawk Sailor
    * .NET Navy Bad Ass *
     
    Posts: 18153
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
    Location: The beautiful PNW


  • Sailor,

    If I am honest the game could go either way. The only reason I see a big win for NE be your INexperience at QB, which can lead to rookie mistakes (only his 6th game in the NFL) and costly Turnovers. BB wil focus 100% on the run game of Seatle, and make Wilson win the game, figuring he will make a mistake or a misread that will be costly. When Wilson matures the seahawks Offense be harder to contain. Maybe this is the game he makes the plays WHO KNOWS, but I do know he will be the won to have to do it for your O.
    PatsFanNH
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 290
    Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:07 am


  • PatsFanNH,

    So, we've had 2 home games. Romo and Rodgers came here and scores a combined 19 pts.
    I like brady, however, he's a statue so he'll be utilizing hot routes all day.

    Yup, Gronk is a monster! A monster that only has 2" and 40 lbs on our CB's. lol! Our CB's!!!
    Check out what Seattle has done so far and pick 4 or 5 guys to add to your injury report next week.

    We may win, we may lose.
    But, many of your players will be hurt leaving this place.

    "Put him in a body bag! Yaaaaaaa!" -That jabroni in the background from the Karate Kid.

    This one's gonna be a fun one! Enjoy the game.
    GET YOUR EAR PLUGS READY!!!
    DROPPIN' THE NOISE HAMMER AT THE SOUTH ALASKA INSANE ASYLUM
    User avatar
    TheHawkster
    * NET Bad Ass *
     
    Posts: 1961
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:00 am
    Location: Puyallup


  • hawkster,

    Romo is a tool, but I hate Romo always have. But the man just plain out sucks, he is Sanchez with more talent around him.

    Also dont be shocked see a few Hawks get hurt as well, Pats have this IMAGE of a finesse team... That was LAST year... our D loves lay some wood out, ask Spikes,Jones,Hightower,Cunningham and Chung... So your guys going feel it too, and it looks like your star RB has a bad back(per the Injury report) he IS going get hit hard and alot... nature of a RB but the Pats D has a rather nasty streak to it.

    oH AND 40 POUNDS AND 2 INCHES IS A LOT... Especially when its pure muscle. I dont know your LB's but I am sure they will have a hard time covering gronk and again 2 inches and 40 pounds a lot give up with a CB.
    Last edited by PatsFanNH on Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
    PatsFanNH
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 290
    Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:07 am


  • Wilson's inexperience scares me a lot. He is rather smart with the ball. Few of his turnovers have been actual bad plays or mental errors on his part. He's obviously a rookie, but a good one with a lot of acumen for the game.

    Gronk frankly scares the hell out of me a lot more than Wilson's inexperience. He's a manbeast at a position where he can sit there and pick apart our short play defense all game long. Brady to Gronk has the ability to keep that offense on the field for far longer than it should be, and will wear out our defense eventually if A) our offense doesn't outperform expectations, and/or B) our defense doesn't step up and make killer plays and third down stops.

    It's gonna be a fun one, alright! I'm stoked!
    World Champion Seattle Seahawks football. It's an addiction, and there is no cure.
    User avatar
    Seahawk Sailor
    * .NET Navy Bad Ass *
     
    Posts: 18153
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
    Location: The beautiful PNW


  • Sailor,

    Wish we could like post here, I agree with you Gronk seems be under appreciated here, almost like you think he is simular to Dallas and 49ers TE. he is not he is meaner and stronger and IMO the best ALL AROUND TE in the game.

    As for Wilson, he has not faced a D managed by a Defensive mastermind like BB, I see them showing the young QB one thing (say a blitz0 they drop out of it and he throws a pick on a quick slant etc. thinking he needs to unload faster. (BB did it for years on one of the greats in P Manning.. so why I expect him get confused.)
    PatsFanNH
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 290
    Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:07 am


  • I don't think Russell has thrown a hot route all year.

    Yes, Gronk is under appreciated here, but how many players have I/we seen in their prime roll through Seattle and disappear?
    It just happens.

    This is Seattle, folks don't appreciate what happens here until their team shows up.
    National media never appreciates it. Its just the way it is. It's fun to fly under the radar.

    128 minutes since anyone has scored a TD against the defense, 100 minutes to the TD prior to that.

    I think N.E. will score a TD this Sunday. Will they score multiple?
    That's the question.

    I love having Season Tickets for weeks like this! #1 Offense vs #1 Defense.

    "Lets Get It On!" -Mills Lane
    GET YOUR EAR PLUGS READY!!!
    DROPPIN' THE NOISE HAMMER AT THE SOUTH ALASKA INSANE ASYLUM
    User avatar
    TheHawkster
    * NET Bad Ass *
     
    Posts: 1961
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:00 am
    Location: Puyallup


  • Hawkster,

    Should ebe a great game, i just hope no bad injuries on either side. Hate see a teams season ruined by losing a key player. (Like Lynch for you guys and Brady for us.. the Pats live and die with him he goes down we are screewed lol)

    all i ask Hawkster is give the Jets 10X the beating when you face them. (their run D sucks lol)
    PatsFanNH
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 290
    Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:07 am


  • Best To be Careful of what you hope for, in case you haven't been watching the Seahawks and RW, guess what, he can actually throw, and oh yea, he's got a cannon for an arm... those rookie mistakes you keep referring to, i'm assuming you're talking about the 6 pic's.. you can credit at the most two of them to russel, tipped pass by lynch, tipped pass by baldwin, his arm was hit while throwing ball popped up for easy pic, mccoy fell down on the play, the one in carolina was a legit mistake.. so keep thinking he throws the ball away, and can't make plays in the pocket.. heck we want you to think that, please do focus on stopping the run... cuz the fact is PC is finally loosening up the playbook, and our recievers are finally getting seperation and making catches.. and from what i've heard from your own fans is your secondary is the weakest part of the defense... sounds good to me...
    World Champs - Sounds good don't it
    User avatar
    hawker84
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3879
    Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm
    Location: Tri Cities, WA


  • Hawker,

    He is a ROOKIE, and ROOKIES make mistakes... and your O is based on the run, so DUH of course they will force a ROOKIE QB on his 6th game to beat them.. That is called comman sense, you dont let their main weapon beat you, you make their UNPROVEN weapon beat you...
    PatsFanNH
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 290
    Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:07 am


  • PatsFanNH wrote:As for Wilson, he has not faced a D managed by a Defensive mastermind like BB, I see them showing the young QB one thing (say a blitz0 they drop out of it and he throws a pick on a quick slant etc. thinking he needs to unload faster. (BB did it for years on one of the greats in P Manning.. so why I expect him get confused.)


    Heh, that would require our OC to include the quick slant into the playbook. :stirthepot:
    Image

    Super Bowl XLVIII Champions
    User avatar
    volsunghawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 7901
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
    Location: Right outside Richard Sherman's house


  • PatsFanNH wrote:Hawker,

    He is a ROOKIE, and ROOKIES make mistakes... and your O is based on the run, so DUH of course they will force a ROOKIE QB on his 6th game to beat them.. That is called comman sense, you dont let their main weapon beat you, you make their UNPROVEN weapon beat you...


    Of course. Most of us know that and have been around the whole "rookie-sucks-pull-him-not-to-waste-a-top-tier-defense" argument so many times it ain't funny. He is a rookie, and he's hitting that point in his first season where a lot of rookies have a slump because there is finally some good tape on them to dissect and scheme.

    The point is that many of the things people take from seeing his stat line aren't the mistakes they assume them to be. With the interception line, for example, reality is he's pretty smart when it comes to ball protection, while the stats don't point to the flukes that caused most of them. He makes mistakes, sure. Just not necessarily ones you'd assume from looking at the stats.
    World Champion Seattle Seahawks football. It's an addiction, and there is no cure.
    User avatar
    Seahawk Sailor
    * .NET Navy Bad Ass *
     
    Posts: 18153
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
    Location: The beautiful PNW


  • Sailor,

    I mean ANY mistakes, for example overthrowing a wide open receiver, or holding the ball a second to long and getting sacked etc, not necessarily TO but things that kill drives.

    I am also not saying Wilson sucks! I am saying any smart Coach makes the rookie beat them and not the star RB. What HC wouldnt game plan that way?
    PatsFanNH
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 290
    Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:07 am


  • PatsFanNH

    Anybody who has the slightest knowledge of the game knows, you try to take away the opposing teams weapons., ya we get that.. our point is what you guys think is our weaknes i.e. (RW) is not a weakness, he's a rookie and makes mistakes, but if you think he cannot move the football down the field with his arm, especially against a weaker defensive back unit, then you have apparently not been watch this team.. and that was my point... so like i said, stack up against the run, and see what happens to your db's...
    World Champs - Sounds good don't it
    User avatar
    hawker84
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3879
    Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm
    Location: Tri Cities, WA


PreviousNext


It is currently Fri Jul 25, 2014 12:10 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information
  • Who is online