| Author |
Message |
|
Zebulon Dak
|
Post subject: Re: Time to GET BEHIND Russell Wilson Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:31 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm Posts: 9972 Location: King In The North
|
Verndog wrote: Scottemojo wrote: How does one disprove something that is happening in your head? Because that is where Flynn is playing better than Wilson. In the real world, Flynn is a pine jockey.
Are you having trouble keeping up? I've made no statement about what Flynn would do, only what Wilson hasn't. My comment quoted was TJack on paper played better then Wilson up through 5 games last year with a worse Oline, and less production from Lynch for support. Disprove the real comment, not your imaginary comment please. Why would I want to prove wrong something that I believe to be true? Russell Wilson so far is Tarvaris Jackson with more intelligence and a much bigger upside.
_________________  Tanzania¹²
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawkfan1975
|
Post subject: Re: Time to GET BEHIND Russell Wilson Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:35 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 1:14 pm Posts: 464
|
Zebulon Dak wrote: Go back to Seahawkblue and stay there please.
But yeah English, it's things like the above that don't really fly. It's just eye-roll material and doesn't need to be fostered. * Just because others aren't feeling the RW praises yet (Zebulon), doesn't mean they are lesser fans, nor should be made to feel unwelcome.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Zebulon Dak
|
Post subject: Re: Time to GET BEHIND Russell Wilson Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:41 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm Posts: 9972 Location: King In The North
|
hawkfan1975 wrote: Zebulon Dak wrote: Go back to Seahawkblue and stay there please.
But yeah English, it's things like the above that don't really fly. It's just eye-roll material and doesn't need to be fostered. * Just because others aren't feeling the RW praises yet (Zebulon), doesn't mean they are lesser fans, nor should be made to feel unwelcome. You have no idea what you're talking about.
_________________  Tanzania¹²
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawkfan1975
|
Post subject: Re: Time to GET BEHIND Russell Wilson Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:44 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 1:14 pm Posts: 464
|
Verndog wrote: Disprove the real comment, not your imaginary comment please.
If you don't mind a suggestion though, verndog you don't need to have some people disprove/prove things left and right, it kind of drags out the fan/fan back and forth (which many here enjoy, that's clear). But if these same people continually decide to poke and prod others (in this case, screaming at some to blindly coin this QB, who's done so little here, a leader) it's best to ignore most of it and stick to your own guns (because that's usually all it is, baiting for an argument. Trolls calling the Troll, Troll).
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: Time to GET BEHIND Russell Wilson Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:46 pm |
|
| * Report Button * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm Posts: 6632
|
|
Can I take a few minutes of everyone's time to talk about the dangers of online bullying?
_________________ @ryanadamdavis
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
CamanoIslandJQ
|
Post subject: Re: Time to GET BEHIND Russell Wilson Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:14 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:11 am Posts: 797 Location: Camano Island, WA
|
|
Some in this thread have some pretty ugly opinions on the QB situation. As I understand it, and many choose to disagree with and ignore, Flynn has a sore elbow. Do y'all really want him to start with that? IMO, if Flynn was to start, it would probably be a poor decision and he'd get his head torn off or at least aggrevate his arm injury. That may be worth it just to shut some folks up. Why do so many posters demand absolute perfection from any QB, especially a rookie? Flynn is pretty much a rookie as well, do y'all think he would be absolutely perfect? IMO, replacing Wilson with Flynn would just involve different "problems" and wouldn't end up increasing the number of passing yards that so many here are concerned about. PC's run first system has obviously taken away from the passing game, Flynn can't change that.
_________________ <--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--> GO SEAHAWKS <--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><-->
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
volsunghawk
|
Post subject: Re: Time to GET BEHIND Russell Wilson Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:08 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am Posts: 6161 Location: Surrounded by Elway, Tebow, and Manning jerseys
|
Verndog wrote: Scottemojo wrote: How does one disprove something that is happening in your head? Because that is where Flynn is playing better than Wilson. In the real world, Flynn is a pine jockey.
Are you having trouble keeping up? I've made no statement about what Flynn would do, only what Wilson hasn't. My comment quoted was TJack on paper played better then Wilson up through 5 games last year with a worse Oline, and less production from Lynch for support. Disprove the real comment, not your imaginary comment please. Correction, Jackson put up more yardage than Wilson through 5 games, and the "less production from Lynch" is precisely WHY he did. The team was passing a hell of a lot more and running a hell of a lot less. See if you can follow this logic... if you have a lot more pass attempts, you will likely have a lot more yardage, and therefore have a higher ranking when it comes to statistics based on yardage. And HF1975, the reason I am dug in on this is two primary reasons: 1. I think Wilson is now and will in the future be a better QB than Flynn. 2. I think real game experience is the absolute BEST way for a QB to improve. I want the Seahawks to win a SB. I want them to win multiple SBs. I want them to be a perennial contender. And I don't think Flynn will get them to any of those goals, but I think Wilson can. Thus, I think any time with Flynn as a starter is completely and utterly wasted.
_________________ Okay, so maybe that pass rush is still an issue. Lather, rinse, repeat.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Hasselbeck
|
Post subject: Re: Time to GET BEHIND Russell Wilson Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:18 pm |
|
| * NET Sage * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm Posts: 2656
|
volsunghawk wrote: Bollocks. Flynn has 4 years of bench sitting. Where has Jim Sorgi's long bench sitting behind Manning gotten him? The best QB in this franchises history did the same sitting. So did Aaron Rodgers. So have many others. It's easy to name Sorgi and Whitehurst as your example. The fact is, we don't know what we have in Flynn until he plays. Wilson probably bought himself another 2 games (I wouldn't want to start Flynn on a short week against the best team in football right now) with the performance yesterday. But I still see some very concerning flaws with our offense and he is a big part of that. Hopefully, Wilson continues to trend upwards and plays better against New England and then San Francisco - if he regresses again though, I think you have to take a long hard look at Flynn.
_________________ Seahawks vs. TBD - Super Bowl 48 - February 2, 2014
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
volsunghawk
|
Post subject: Re: Time to GET BEHIND Russell Wilson Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:22 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am Posts: 6161 Location: Surrounded by Elway, Tebow, and Manning jerseys
|
Hasselbeck wrote: volsunghawk wrote: Bollocks. Flynn has 4 years of bench sitting. Where has Jim Sorgi's long bench sitting behind Manning gotten him? The best QB in this franchises history did the same sitting. So did Aaron Rodgers. So have many others. It's easy to name Sorgi and Whitehurst as your example. The fact is, we don't know what we have in Flynn until he plays. Wilson probably bought himself another 2 games (I wouldn't want to start Flynn on a short week against the best team in football right now) with the performance yesterday. But I still see some very concerning flaws with our offense and he is a big part of that. Aaron Rodgers was discussed as a potential #1 overall pick, so the talent was obvious. He slipped for whatever reasons (still won't understand that one, except perhaps the Tedford curse), and fell to a team that already had a HoF-caliber QB. THAT is why he sat, and his talent is why he is succeeding now. It's not that sitting on the bench did wonders for him. How did it do for Aaron Brooks, in that same damn system? How about Flacco, Ryan, Roethlisberger, Stafford, etc.? All of these QBs are doing quite well now, and many of them did pretty damn well in their rookie years. All without absorbing magical QB knowledge through their asses via bench osmosis. 
_________________ Okay, so maybe that pass rush is still an issue. Lather, rinse, repeat.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Zebulon Dak
|
Post subject: Re: Time to GET BEHIND Russell Wilson Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:36 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm Posts: 9972 Location: King In The North
|
|
Matt Flynn wasn't good enough to beat out a rookie drafted in the 3rd round for the starting gig. If Coach doesn't think he gives us a better chance to win than RW then you can be damn sure none of you monkey asses are gonna convince me.
_________________  Tanzania¹²
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
dunceface
|
Post subject: Re: Time to GET BEHIND Russell Wilson Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 9:01 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 10:29 am Posts: 1912
|
Zebulon Dak wrote: Matt Flynn wasn't good enough to beat out a rookie drafted in the 3rd round for the starting gig. If Coach doesn't think he gives us a better chance to win than RW then you can be damn sure none of you monkey asses are gonna convince me. CHUUUUUUUUUUUCH!!!!
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawkfan1975
|
Post subject: Re: Time to GET BEHIND Russell Wilson Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:50 am |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 1:14 pm Posts: 464
|
Zebulon Dak wrote: Matt Flynn wasn't good enough to beat out a rookie drafted in the 3rd round for the starting gig. If Coach doesn't think he gives us a better chance to win than RW then you can be damn sure none of you monkey asses are gonna convince me. and now we have RW! Our TD machine! Guh? I wonder who next years infatuation will be.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Zebulon Dak
|
Post subject: Re: Time to GET BEHIND Russell Wilson Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 1:00 am |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm Posts: 9972 Location: King In The North
|
hawkfan1975 wrote: Zebulon Dak wrote: Matt Flynn wasn't good enough to beat out a rookie drafted in the 3rd round for the starting gig. If Coach doesn't think he gives us a better chance to win than RW then you can be damn sure none of you monkey asses are gonna convince me. and now we have RW! Our TD machine! Guh? I wonder who next years infatuation will be. It's gonna be the exact same guys plus a few rookies, troll.
_________________  Tanzania¹²
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Tech Worlds
|
Post subject: Re: Time to GET BEHIND Russell Wilson Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 1:11 am |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:40 am Posts: 6897 Location: Granite Falls, WA
|
|
All this is really silly guys.
Just cheer on whoever is out there. These agendas around here are old.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Zebulon Dak
|
Post subject: Re: Time to GET BEHIND Russell Wilson Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 1:33 am |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm Posts: 9972 Location: King In The North
|
|
I rather like my agenda: let the kids play ball and let us that enjoy watching them play ball do so without being villainized for it.
_________________  Tanzania¹²
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
HawKnPeppa
|
Post subject: Re: Time to GET BEHIND Russell Wilson Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 1:55 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:01 pm Posts: 1207
|
|
"DilFER!...DilFER!...DilFER!..." Would you guys knock if off already? I'm guessing most of you know how long it takes to develope an NFL QB (although I'm starting to question that), so stop playing Madden with ours.
_________________ "A couple years from now Wilson will be forgotten about and you will forget I said he would fail" (Cboom, 2012)
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
pinksheets
|
Post subject: Re: Time to GET BEHIND Russell Wilson Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 1:56 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 3:47 pm Posts: 2505 Location: Seattle
|
Zebulon Dak wrote: Matt Flynn wasn't good enough to beat out a rookie drafted in the 3rd round for the starting gig. If Coach doesn't think he gives us a better chance to win than RW then you can be damn sure none of you monkey asses are gonna convince me. Bingo. The pro-Flynn crowd is operating on the presumption that they know better than Pete, and Flynn is any sort of improvement. Let's be open to the possibility that Pete has seen what he has in Flynn and has no interest in plugging him in as the starter from this point on.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
VHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Time to GET BEHIND Russell Wilson Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:01 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 9:44 am Posts: 2512 Location: Naples, FL
|
Zebulon Dak wrote: Matt Flynn wasn't good enough to beat out a rookie drafted in the 3rd round for the starting gig. If Coach doesn't think he gives us a better chance to win than RW then you can be damn sure none of you monkey asses are gonna convince me. I approve this message.
_________________ Wolf grey all day every day.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SouthSoundHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Time to GET BEHIND Russell Wilson Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:44 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:06 am Posts: 661
|
Zebulon Dak wrote: Matt Flynn wasn't good enough to beat out a rookie drafted in the 3rd round for the starting gig. If Coach doesn't think he gives us a better chance to win than RW then you can be damn sure none of you monkey asses are gonna convince me. I as well. Some people in here should look for a nice NFL coaching position or maybe even scout for their favorite team (just hope it's not the Seahawks) when vacancies open up at the end of the year.
_________________ Go Hawks.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
uncle fester
|
Post subject: Re: Time to GET BEHIND Russell Wilson Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 5:17 am |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:21 am Posts: 457
|
|
If this thread was a science project, it would now be awarded a gold star for achieving perpetual motion.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: 707HAWKfan, Attyla the Hawk, Barthawk, BASF, BCHawk, Beeker, Bill Assumpcao, Cartire, cnjvh, CornerHawk, CurryStopstheRuns, DericLee, Giedi, Google [Bot], Hawkboi, Hawken-Dazs, hawksfan1976, hawksfanohio, HoustonHawk82, jdblack, LawlessHawk, Marvin49, MidwestHawker, muxpux, NinerLifer, nsport, PasteyNuTTeR, SeahawkFrost, SeahawksFanForever, Seahwkgal, Spleenhawk2.0, Sports Hernia, T-Sizzle, twisted_steel2, Wiseguy and 129 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |