Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate  Chat Room

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 144 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 9:08 am 
* 17Power Blogger *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 11208
Sgt. Largent wrote:
But it's not, this team is built to compete for a Superbowl NOW, not in four years. We have all the other pieces in place, a top 5 defense, the #1 running attack in the league, and a very good special teams.


I don't agree. I don't think our offensive line is ready to consistently pass-protect yet, and I don't think our receiving corps is nearly good enough. Most quarterbacks would be running into trouble in the passing game with those issues. We're not there yet.

_________________
GO HAWKS!!!

Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!

Follow me on Twitter at @17power


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 9:35 am 
* Gangnameister *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 11083
Location: PoCompton, BC Canada
pehawk wrote:
I totally accept the fact it's a 4-year plan. But, emotionally it makes me pout like a toddler. "B-b-b-b-but I want to win NOW!"


And this pretty much sums up the state of things at the moment.

I love how people can say in one breath that they want to be like the Patriots or the Ravens or the Steelers, only to advocate firing everyone and starting over in the next. Rebuilds like that take time and perhaps more importantly a little consistency.

Everyone keeps stressing about how our window is *NOW*. Get outta here. Our window is not RIGHT NOW, it's right around the corner. Likely even next year. Hell, we might even be in a position to make a late season rush at the end of this year, but we need to let it all come together first. The herbs and spices are in place, just need to let it marinate. Have to give it some time to let the yeast rise. Additional generic cooking metaphor.

We have lots of time. TONS. Marshawn will be 27 next year, that's at least 2 years of prime time left (and we have a very young and apparently very capable Bob Turbin sitting behind him). Earl Thomas, KJ Wright and James Carpenter are just babies at 23; they litterally have entire careers left. Ditto for Dick Sherman, Chancellor, Tate, McCoy and Okung who are all 24. Bobby Wagner and Bobby Turbin are only 22! Shit I have jerseys in my closet older than that! The only guys I'm even kinda worried about are Clemons and Browner, but Irvin appears to be getting it and Browner's style doesn't really depend on having blazing top speed so he might be able to keep it up into his 30's. Other than that... this is a seriously young team.

So seriously, all this "OUR WINDOW IS NOW!! DOMINATE NOW!! SUPERBOWL NOW!!" bull shit just needs to frakkin stop. Get off the ledge, take a xanax and down it with a nice sharaz because you people are bug shit crazy and are going to give yourselves a stroke. Just hurry up and be patient. Like right now! I SAID BE PATIENT DAMMIT!!!

_________________
I <3 Nunchucks


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 9:47 am 
* NET Baller *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 17385
Location: Graham, WA
CANHawk wrote:
pehawk wrote:
I totally accept the fact it's a 4-year plan. But, emotionally it makes me pout like a toddler. "B-b-b-b-but I want to win NOW!"


And this pretty much sums up the state of things at the moment.

I love how people can say in one breath that they want to be like the Patriots or the Ravens or the Steelers, only to advocate firing everyone and starting over in the next. Rebuilds like that take time and perhaps more importantly a little consistency.

Everyone keeps stressing about how our window is *NOW*. Get outta here. Our window is not RIGHT NOW, it's right around the corner. Likely even next year. Hell, we might even be in a position to make a late season rush at the end of this year, but we need to let it all come together first. The herbs and spices are in place, just need to let it marinate. Have to give it some time to let the yeast rise. Additional generic cooking metaphor.

We have lots of time. TONS. Marshawn will be 27 next year, that's at least 2 years of prime time left (and we have a very young and apparently very capable Bob Turbin sitting behind him). Earl Thomas, KJ Wright and James Carpenter are just babies at 23; they litterally have entire careers left. Ditto for Dick Sherman, Chancellor, Tate, McCoy and Okung who are all 24. Bobby Wagner and Bobby Turbin are only 22! Shit I have jerseys in my closet older than that! The only guys I'm even kinda worried about are Clemons and Browner, but Irvin appears to be getting it and Browner's style doesn't really depend on having blazing top speed so he might be able to keep it up into his 30's. Other than that... this is a seriously young team.

So seriously, all this "OUR WINDOW IS NOW!! DOMINATE NOW!! SUPERBOWL NOW!!" bull shit just needs to frakkin stop. Get off the ledge, take a xanax and down it with a nice sharaz because you people are bug shit crazy and are going to give yourselves a stroke. Just hurry up and be patient. Like right now! I SAID BE PATIENT DAMMIT!!!


Image

_________________
Image
3elieve


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:02 am 
*Scott of Smacksville*
*Scott of Smacksville*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 10044
In the last 7 years, we have seen PLENTY of Super Bowl contenders that had both holes in their teams, and even lackluster records until they ramped it up in the last month of the season. Getting freaked out after one month just feels like it lacks vision.

_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:19 am 
* 17Power Blogger *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 11208
Agree with CANHawk - Pete would look pretty dumb if he built a defense that managed only a year or two of dominance. There are plenty of models around the league for recycling defenses cost-effectively; they'll figure it out. And the running game will hopefully have some longevity with Turbin around. So we have time.

_________________
GO HAWKS!!!

Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!

Follow me on Twitter at @17power


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:26 am 
* The Producer *
* The Producer *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 13441
Location: King In The North
Everybody in this thread is RIGHT!! Now let's watch the games and see what happens!!

_________________
Image Image Tanzania¹² Image "ALERT THE LEGION!!!"


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:43 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 1335
CANHawk wrote:
pehawk wrote:
I totally accept the fact it's a 4-year plan. But, emotionally it makes me pout like a toddler. "B-b-b-b-but I want to win NOW!"


And this pretty much sums up the state of things at the moment.

I love how people can say in one breath that they want to be like the Patriots or the Ravens or the Steelers, only to advocate firing everyone and starting over in the next. Rebuilds like that take time and perhaps more importantly a little consistency.

Everyone keeps stressing about how our window is *NOW*. Get outta here. Our window is not RIGHT NOW, it's right around the corner. Likely even next year. Hell, we might even be in a position to make a late season rush at the end of this year, but we need to let it all come together first. The herbs and spices are in place, just need to let it marinate. Have to give it some time to let the yeast rise. Additional generic cooking metaphor.

We have lots of time. TONS. Marshawn will be 27 next year, that's at least 2 years of prime time left (and we have a very young and apparently very capable Bob Turbin sitting behind him). Earl Thomas, KJ Wright and James Carpenter are just babies at 23; they litterally have entire careers left. Ditto for Dick Sherman, Chancellor, Tate, McCoy and Okung who are all 24. Bobby Wagner and Bobby Turbin are only 22! Shit I have jerseys in my closet older than that! The only guys I'm even kinda worried about are Clemons and Browner, but Irvin appears to be getting it and Browner's style doesn't really depend on having blazing top speed so he might be able to keep it up into his 30's. Other than that... this is a seriously young team.

So seriously, all this "OUR WINDOW IS NOW!! DOMINATE NOW!! SUPERBOWL NOW!!" bull shit just needs to frakkin stop. Get off the ledge, take a xanax and down it with a nice sharaz because you people are bug shit crazy and are going to give yourselves a stroke. Just hurry up and be patient. Like right now! I SAID BE PATIENT DAMMIT!!!


After the Arizona game I made a thread about "we will go 8-8 and miss the playoffs". Man was I trashed by many on this board. The next week I apologized about my statement. Not because I felt my comments were wrong, but that I didn't wait until my intended 4 game evaluation before making that thread.

Well here we are 4 games in and my original thread seems just as relevant today as then. The only difference is I just don't post much now, and I drink wine while I watch and don't really get worked up over the end results. Because any way you wish to look at it, we are still a work in progress. I felt Flynn would have potentially expedited that process, but obviously PC doesn't agree. I personally don't believe the elbow issue one damn bit. But it's not for me to say, so I just will keep watching the games with my wine glass in hand. No one is getting me worked up over this season. Not with this current offense.

:thirishdrinkers:


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:48 am 
NET Rookie
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 10:52 am
Posts: 220
Kearly...I know you don't like this sort of stuff, but thank you for a thoughtful, well articulated post. I always enjoy reading your thoughts and the reasoning behind them, even if I don't always necessarily agree. Your contributions are a nice contrast to the plethora of emotionally laden, shrill shouting matches found in abundance elsewhere on .net.

I'm with you thinking we're sitting on a powder keg and can't wait to see how & when it plays out.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:53 am 
NET Pro Bowler
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
Posts: 10162
Location: Vancouver, WA
Two things immediately jumped out at me in your synopsis Kip:

"This team is talent overkill. It's a stick of dynamite soaked in kerosene. A quality quarterback is the match."
.
.
.
and
.
.
.
"This team is young and this team has almost everything you'd want outside of a great QB"



Therein lies the rub man. The position is so ABSOLUTELY vital in sports that a good one can carry an otherwise mediocre team to the Super Bowl (see Brady, Tom and last year's Patriots) while a less than stellar QB will drag an otherwise good team into 8-8 land or at the best maybe a Wild Card round win. For example, though lot of people aren't going to like this, think Dave Kreig.....I loved Bone but I still say the Hawks win a couple of Super Bowls in the Knox era with a top flight QB. On the other hand, Hass had his best season in '07 and without it the Hawks don't even smell the playoffs. My rambling point is that no matter the years involved and no matter the plan, unless this regime finds the right QB, we are going to see a lot of 9-7, maybe 10-6 first round exits at the best and 8-8, 7-9 seasons at worst (the defense is too good to be any crappier than that). There's a reason Shanahan sold half his future for RGIII, cuz he felt the franchise guy is 3/4 of the battle, or 60% anyway. Is Wilson the truly great QB this franchise has NEVER had? Time will of course tell. I will say you have no idea how badly I want that to be the case because until this franchise finds him, I'm not sure there will be a Super Bowl "W".

_________________
From the white sands
To the canyon lands
To the redwood stands
To the barren lands

Image


Last edited by hawksfansinceday1 on Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:55 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:54 am 
NET Bench Warmer
User avatar
Online

Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 9:34 am
Posts: 48
Location: Idaho
well if pete carroll goes 7-9 for a third straight year then what improvements has he really made? we basically have a whole new team that is still mediocore. the whole league is getting better so yes are team is better than 2 years ago but so is the rest of the league. we need to take a bigger leap to get to the top. we need that elite quarterback plain and simple.

_________________
Image
GO HAWKS!!!!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:59 am 
* The Producer *
* The Producer *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 13441
Location: King In The North
Hawksfan76 wrote:
well if pete carroll goes 7-9 for a third straight year then what improvements has he really made? we basically have a whole new team that is still mediocore. the whole league is getting better so yes are team is better than 2 years ago but so is the rest of the league. we need to take a bigger leap to get to the top. we need that elite quarterback plain and simple.


And what if we don't get him? What if it's not Russ or Flynn? What if we draft a guy next year and he sucks?

_________________
Image Image Tanzania¹² Image "ALERT THE LEGION!!!"


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:00 am 
* Gangnameister *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 11083
Location: PoCompton, BC Canada
Hawksfan76 wrote:
well if pete carroll goes 7-9 for a third straight year then what improvements has he really made? we basically have a whole new team that is still mediocore. the whole league is getting better so yes are team is better than 2 years ago but so is the rest of the league. we need to take a bigger leap to get to the top. we need that elite quarterback plain and simple.


The whole league is getting better? So everyone will have a winning record? How might I ask does that work?

_________________
I <3 Nunchucks


Last edited by CANHawk on Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:04 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:01 am 
NET Bench Warmer
User avatar
Online

Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 9:34 am
Posts: 48
Location: Idaho
Zebulon Dak wrote:
Hawksfan76 wrote:
well if pete carroll goes 7-9 for a third straight year then what improvements has he really made? we basically have a whole new team that is still mediocore. the whole league is getting better so yes are team is better than 2 years ago but so is the rest of the league. we need to take a bigger leap to get to the top. we need that elite quarterback plain and simple.


And what if we don't get him? What if it's not Russ or Flynn? What if we draft a guy next year and he sucks?



then we will remain a mediocore team.

_________________
Image
GO HAWKS!!!!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:01 am 
* The Producer *
* The Producer *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 13441
Location: King In The North
Hawksfan76 wrote:
Zebulon Dak wrote:
Hawksfan76 wrote:
well if pete carroll goes 7-9 for a third straight year then what improvements has he really made? we basically have a whole new team that is still mediocore. the whole league is getting better so yes are team is better than 2 years ago but so is the rest of the league. we need to take a bigger leap to get to the top. we need that elite quarterback plain and simple.


And what if we don't get him? What if it's not Russ or Flynn? What if we draft a guy next year and he sucks?



then we will remain a mediocore team.


Right. Then what?

_________________
Image Image Tanzania¹² Image "ALERT THE LEGION!!!"


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:04 am 
NET Bench Warmer
User avatar
Online

Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 9:34 am
Posts: 48
Location: Idaho
CANHawk wrote:
Hawksfan76 wrote:
well if pete carroll goes 7-9 for a third straight year then what improvements has he really made? we basically have a whole new team that is still mediocore. the whole league is getting better so yes are team is better than 2 years ago but so is the rest of the league. we need to take a bigger leap to get to the top. we need that elite quarterback plain and simple.


The whole league is getting better? So everyone will have a winning record? How does how might I ask does that work?


no they won't obviously but all the teams seem to be getting better and more competitive across the board so it all comes down to whether or not we have a quarterback to take us to the next level. i like the rest of our team but it comes down to the quarterback and maybe a bigtime receiver. whether it's wilson or flynn that can do this for us who knows but i feel that's where we stand between greatness and where we are now.

_________________
Image
GO HAWKS!!!!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:10 am 
* Gangnameister *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 11083
Location: PoCompton, BC Canada
Hawksfan76 wrote:
CANHawk wrote:
Hawksfan76 wrote:
well if pete carroll goes 7-9 for a third straight year then what improvements has he really made? we basically have a whole new team that is still mediocore. the whole league is getting better so yes are team is better than 2 years ago but so is the rest of the league. we need to take a bigger leap to get to the top. we need that elite quarterback plain and simple.


The whole league is getting better? So everyone will have a winning record? How does how might I ask does that work?


no they won't obviously but all the teams seem to be getting better and more competitive across the board so it all comes down to whether or not we have a quarterback to take us to the next level. i like the rest of our team but it comes down to the quarterback and maybe a bigtime receiver. whether it's wilson or flynn that can do this for us who knows but i feel that's where we stand between greatness and where we are now.


Oh, like the 0-4 Saints and the 1-3 Lions, right?

_________________
I <3 Nunchucks


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:11 am 
NET Bench Warmer
User avatar
Online

Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 9:34 am
Posts: 48
Location: Idaho
Quote:
then we will remain a mediocore team.

Right. Then what?


then who knows, new coaches. different direction. same old seahawks finishing middle of the pack.

_________________
Image
GO HAWKS!!!!


Last edited by Hawksfan76 on Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:13 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:11 am 
NET Pro Bowler
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
Posts: 10162
Location: Vancouver, WA
To further my point above....I've said for the last year that Pete Carroll's future employment in the NFL is almost completely dependent on him finding the right QB for this team and I stand by that assertation. Because of the rules of the game nowdays favoring the passing game so completely I don't think you are SB caliber without the at least a top 10 QB.

_________________
From the white sands
To the canyon lands
To the redwood stands
To the barren lands

Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:11 am 
* Dirty Harry *
* Dirty Harry *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 11:51 am
Posts: 5424
Location: Magnolia, Texas
Too busy to type out what I really want to say now, but...

...what Can said, and what Montana agreed with.

That is all.

_________________
"God bless America, and God bless the Seattle Seahawks" - Cortez Kennedy


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:41 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 4258
sorry Kearly, but pointing out what a great job they've done building this team isn't addressing the valid concerns people are having right now. No one is unhappy with their ability to build a team. We all Trust Pete and John when it comes to building this team. There are valid concerns, however, when it comes to playcalling (onsides kick anyone? 3rd and 2?). You can go back two years and see WTF? moments in Pete's playcalling which he later - admirably I might add - took the blame for.

But the biggest concern is the choice of starting Wilson now. Maybe he'll one day be that QB we've all been waiting for. But a rookie has a lot to learn and it's best for him to sit out a year or two and get acclimated to the speed and technicality of the NFL. Flynn already did that. Flynn comes from a team known for producing good QB's. Flynn already proved he can play in a regular season game with success. Wilson should never have won the job. Pete should have KNOWN better. By giving Wilson the job Pete basically said this year was expendable. We'll take what we can get. But Pete overlooked two critical things no head coach should ever overlook: A rookie can get overwhelmed, shell shocked and develop bad habits if thrown into the fire before he's ready. Wilson needed to acclimate. He's already shown signs that he's regressing, just as you yourself pointed out. The other thing is that it takes time even for a guy who is ready to start, aka Flynn, to learn how to play efficiently day in and day out. Look at Hass. Sat out two years, got the starting job, sucked (150 yds per game sound familiar?) and got benched. Then, his second time around he took off.

It takes time even for QB's who've been in the NFL a while to develop.

Wilson should have been on the bench, learning, from the get go. Flynn should have been out there getting his hands dirty from the get go. That way, Flynn develops into a quality QB much sooner and Wilson, who's developmental track was always bound to be longer than Flynn's, can get valuable experience without costing the team games.

Instead, Pete bypassed Flynn and put Wilson on the fast track. It was a mistake. Mistakes about who your starting QB should be are deadly in the NFL. Not just to the team, but to the coaches credibility. Combine that with craptastic playcalling in crucial moments and there aren't many who will retain faith in Pete no matter how fantastic he is at building a good team. Pete needs to let Flynn play. If Flynn can't cut it, worst thing that happens is he would have given Wilson time to regather himself, learn on the sidelines and have a fire lit underneath him to get better and reclaim his team. If Flynn succeeds, nobody cares anymore that Pete made a bad judgement call because he corrected it. If Flynn fails, everyone sees that Pete's judgement was correct and it was just a matter of him not really having ANY QB that was ready, but at least he now can go back to Wilson knowing that he left no stone unturned.

_________________
Richard Sherman doesn't just wanna get in your head, he wants to build a vacation home there.

R. Sherman: "I don't want to be an island. I want to be a tourist attraction. You come, I take your money & you go."


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:48 am 
*Scott of Smacksville*
*Scott of Smacksville*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 10044
SalishHawkFan wrote:
sorry Kearly, but pointing out what a great job they've done building this team isn't addressing the valid concerns people are having right now. No one is unhappy with their ability to build a team. We all Trust Pete and John when it comes to building this team. There are valid concerns, however, when it comes to playcalling (onsides kick anyone? 3rd and 2?). You can go back two years and see WTF? moments in Pete's playcalling which he later - admirably I might add - took the blame for.

But the biggest concern is the choice of starting Wilson now. Maybe he'll one day be that QB we've all been waiting for. But a rookie has a lot to learn and it's best for him to sit out a year or two and get acclimated to the speed and technicality of the NFL. Flynn already did that. Flynn comes from a team known for producing good QB's. Flynn already proved he can play in a regular season game with success. Wilson should never have won the job. Pete should have KNOWN better. By giving Wilson the job Pete basically said this year was expendable. We'll take what we can get. But Pete overlooked two critical things no head coach should ever overlook: A rookie can get overwhelmed, shell shocked and develop bad habits if thrown into the fire before he's ready. Wilson needed to acclimate. He's already shown signs that he's regressing, just as you yourself pointed out. The other thing is that it takes time even for a guy who is ready to start, aka Flynn, to learn how to play efficiently day in and day out. Look at Hass. Sat out two years, got the starting job, sucked (150 yds per game sound familiar?) and got benched. Then, his second time around he took off.

It takes time even for QB's who've been in the NFL a while to develop.

Wilson should have been on the bench, learning, from the get go. Flynn should have been out there getting his hands dirty from the get go. That way, Flynn develops into a quality QB much sooner and Wilson, who's developmental track was always bound to be longer than Flynn's, can get valuable experience without costing the team games.

Instead, Pete bypassed Flynn and put Wilson on the fast track. It was a mistake. Mistakes about who your starting QB should be are deadly in the NFL. Not just to the team, but to the coaches credibility. Combine that with craptastic playcalling in crucial moments and there aren't many who will retain faith in Pete no matter how fantastic he is at building a good team. Pete needs to let Flynn play. If Flynn can't cut it, worst thing that happens is he would have given Wilson time to regather himself, learn on the sidelines and have a fire lit underneath him to get better and reclaim his team. If Flynn succeeds, nobody cares anymore that Pete made a bad judgement call because he corrected it. If Flynn fails, everyone sees that Pete's judgement was correct and it was just a matter of him not really having ANY QB that was ready, but at least he now can go back to Wilson knowing that he left no stone unturned.


All your rhetoric boils down to the oldest and least true argument in the NFL. We aren't winning because the backup is being squandered on the bench. The idea that the backup needs to start so we can see what we got is tired, and bullshit to the core. It automatically assumes that the coach/staff has not seen enough in camp, practice, and preseason to make the right decision.

_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:52 am 
* Natural Rubbing Action *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 17585
Location: The beautiful PNW
Scottemojo wrote:
All your rhetoric boils down to the oldest and least true argument in the NFL. We aren't winning because the backup is being squandered on the bench. The idea that the backup needs to start so we can see what we got is tired, and bullshit to the core. It automatically assumes that the coach/staff has not seen enough in camp, practice, and preseason to make the right decision.


But the backup has more exper... er... he's more mobile and can esca... er... he's been in Carroll's system longe... er... he's got a stronger ar... er... he's three inches taller, damnit!

_________________
World Champion Seattle Seahawks football. It's an addiction, and there is no cure.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:54 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 4258
It DOES assume the staff didn't make the right decision. Making the decision to start a rookie QB in his first year is almost invariably the WRONG decision if you have ANYONE capable of starting instead. Look at Peytons first year. Look at any elite QB's rookie year when he was thrown into the fire. The teams that do that HAVE to do that. Choice isn't an option. They picked so high in the draft because they already sucked and needed a QB.

But when you've got THREE QB's, one with extensive experience - albeit he'd never improve past mediocre - one with excellent credentials and potential who'd already shown he can succeed in the NFL and one who's a wet behind the ears QB you took in the third round, you're making a mistake to start him.

The results of that mistake are so obvious that even Kearly sees it despite how hyped up he's been about Wilson. The guy is regressing.

_________________
Richard Sherman doesn't just wanna get in your head, he wants to build a vacation home there.

R. Sherman: "I don't want to be an island. I want to be a tourist attraction. You come, I take your money & you go."


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:55 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 6:14 am
Posts: 848
Do you not remember everyone saying the same thing about Whitehurst? Could it be possible that Flynn just isnt very good?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:56 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 1335
Scottemojo wrote:
SalishHawkFan wrote:
sorry Kearly, but pointing out what a great job they've done building this team isn't addressing the valid concerns people are having right now. No one is unhappy with their ability to build a team. We all Trust Pete and John when it comes to building this team. There are valid concerns, however, when it comes to playcalling (onsides kick anyone? 3rd and 2?). You can go back two years and see WTF? moments in Pete's playcalling which he later - admirably I might add - took the blame for.

But the biggest concern is the choice of starting Wilson now. Maybe he'll one day be that QB we've all been waiting for. But a rookie has a lot to learn and it's best for him to sit out a year or two and get acclimated to the speed and technicality of the NFL. Flynn already did that. Flynn comes from a team known for producing good QB's. Flynn already proved he can play in a regular season game with success. Wilson should never have won the job. Pete should have KNOWN better. By giving Wilson the job Pete basically said this year was expendable. We'll take what we can get. But Pete overlooked two critical things no head coach should ever overlook: A rookie can get overwhelmed, shell shocked and develop bad habits if thrown into the fire before he's ready. Wilson needed to acclimate. He's already shown signs that he's regressing, just as you yourself pointed out. The other thing is that it takes time even for a guy who is ready to start, aka Flynn, to learn how to play efficiently day in and day out. Look at Hass. Sat out two years, got the starting job, sucked (150 yds per game sound familiar?) and got benched. Then, his second time around he took off.

It takes time even for QB's who've been in the NFL a while to develop.

Wilson should have been on the bench, learning, from the get go. Flynn should have been out there getting his hands dirty from the get go. That way, Flynn develops into a quality QB much sooner and Wilson, who's developmental track was always bound to be longer than Flynn's, can get valuable experience without costing the team games.

Instead, Pete bypassed Flynn and put Wilson on the fast track. It was a mistake. Mistakes about who your starting QB should be are deadly in the NFL. Not just to the team, but to the coaches credibility. Combine that with craptastic playcalling in crucial moments and there aren't many who will retain faith in Pete no matter how fantastic he is at building a good team. Pete needs to let Flynn play. If Flynn can't cut it, worst thing that happens is he would have given Wilson time to regather himself, learn on the sidelines and have a fire lit underneath him to get better and reclaim his team. If Flynn succeeds, nobody cares anymore that Pete made a bad judgement call because he corrected it. If Flynn fails, everyone sees that Pete's judgement was correct and it was just a matter of him not really having ANY QB that was ready, but at least he now can go back to Wilson knowing that he left no stone unturned.


All your rhetoric boils down to the oldest and least true argument in the NFL. We aren't winning because the backup is being squandered on the bench. The idea that the backup needs to start so we can see what we got is tired, and bullshit to the core. It automatically assumes that the coach/staff has not seen enough in camp, practice, and preseason to make the right decision.


Or the starter is on the bench, and the backup is the mistake starter. Just depends on how you wish to look at things. Who is to say which is right or wrong at this point?

It is what it is.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:00 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 1335
iigakusei wrote:
Do you not remember everyone saying the same thing about Whitehurst? Could it be possible that Flynn just isnt very good?


Then how do you explain the New Englund and Detroit games performance. You don't post results like that and put him in the same class as Whitehurst! Not at all.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:02 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:28 pm
Posts: 5301
Location: Wilsonville, Oregon
Thanks for another great read kearly. I agree pretty much on every point.

I'm trying my best not to be dissapointed in this offense right now. Life is short afterall and every year our offense blows chunks is another year of seahawk fandom we never get back but.... I still firmly believe that they are building this team in the right direction and I'm loving the players that are in place for the most part.

I will add though, that if the offense doesn't show a gradual improvement over the course of this year, and a much larger improvement next, that Carroll and company need to be on the hot seat if not fired out right by then.

If they can show improvement week by week this year, I can still be "all in".


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:02 pm 
* Natural Rubbing Action *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 17585
Location: The beautiful PNW
kf3339 wrote:
iigakusei wrote:
Do you not remember everyone saying the same thing about Whitehurst? Could it be possible that Flynn just isnt very good?


Then how do you explain the New Englund and Detroit games performance. You don't post results like that and put him in the same class as Whitehurst! Not at all.


Is that you, Michael Lombardi? If so, please say why Flynn is the better option, not just "HOLY SHORT QUARTERBACK, BATMAN!"

_________________
World Champion Seattle Seahawks football. It's an addiction, and there is no cure.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:07 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 4258
Whitehurst is not Flynn. I was the only person on this board who was outraged at what we gave up to get Whitehurst. Everyone was so giddy about P&J's first draft that I got ripped into left and right for criticizing that move. Whitehurst had done NOTHING to make anyone think he'd ever amount to anything.

Flynn is not Whitehurst. Flynn HAS done things to show he can succeed in the NFL, just ask Bart Starr, Bret Favre and Aaron Rodgers. He set records none of them hold. All Flynn didn't do was show up early enough and leave late enough to get on Petes good side, then he was asked to play too conservatively in the two first preseason games. Wilsons style was always going to look great in the preseason where he's not up against anything but vanilla defenses. But when the training wheels went on, Flynn didn't shine.

Lots of great players don't shine during preseason and kick butt during the regular season. They even had a show on it on Sportscenter one time.

No, Pete chose Wilson because Pete's "unconventional wisdom" and all the grief he took for picking him and Pete's inability to move past his college football years (onsides kicks, fancy plays that only work in college, etc.) blinded him to the fact that Wilson would not have the same success in the regular season. Pete has too much college 'rah rah" in him to get past how exciting Wilson looked vs vanilla defenses and second stringers to realize that Flynn might not look as flashy, but he's got the skillset to start in the NFL right NOW.

For the record: I'd rather see Wilson succeed. I was never very hyped on Flynn. His passes are wobbly, he doesn't have a strong arm. And I think the Seahawks can still make the playoffs despite Wilson's learning curve holding them back.

But Wilson shouldn't be thrust into the fire so soon. He's just not ready and he'll regress. He might never realize his potential BECAUSE he's starting now. Flynn IS ready. Flynn should have started all along.

_________________
Richard Sherman doesn't just wanna get in your head, he wants to build a vacation home there.

R. Sherman: "I don't want to be an island. I want to be a tourist attraction. You come, I take your money & you go."


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:09 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 6:14 am
Posts: 848
kf3339 wrote:
iigakusei wrote:
Do you not remember everyone saying the same thing about Whitehurst? Could it be possible that Flynn just isnt very good?


Then how do you explain the New Englund and Detroit games performance. You don't post results like that and put him in the same class as Whitehurst! Not at all.


I guess that is why there was so much demand for him in the off-season? That Detroit game was a one-off - of that I am positive. Look, I think Flynn is a good QB, but I trust the coaches that see these guys every day in practice to make the right decision.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:12 pm 
*Scott of Smacksville*
*Scott of Smacksville*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 10044
kf3339 wrote:
iigakusei wrote:
Do you not remember everyone saying the same thing about Whitehurst? Could it be possible that Flynn just isnt very good?


Then how do you explain the New Englund and Detroit games performance. You don't post results like that and put him in the same class as Whitehurst! Not at all.

31 other GMs, some in desperate quarterback straights, saw those same two games and did not chase after Mr. Flynn. How do you explain that he was such a bargain after those two games?

_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:17 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 4258
Scottemojo wrote:
kf3339 wrote:
iigakusei wrote:
Do you not remember everyone saying the same thing about Whitehurst? Could it be possible that Flynn just isnt very good?


Then how do you explain the New Englund and Detroit games performance. You don't post results like that and put him in the same class as Whitehurst! Not at all.

31 other GMs, some in desperate quarterback straights, saw those same two games and did not chase after Mr. Flynn. How do you explain that he was such a bargain after those two games?

One knew they were drafting Luck. One was trying to grab RG3. One grabbed Tannehill. A couple were in the hunt for Mr. Manning. One in Florida didn't offer him as good a deal as we did. The rest already had QB's they were going with. Who would have grabbed Flynn besides Miami that didn't already have someone lined up? You aren't going to dump a QB with experience in your system for an untested FA. The Niners would have snatched up Manning, but dump Smith for Flynn? No way.

_________________
Richard Sherman doesn't just wanna get in your head, he wants to build a vacation home there.

R. Sherman: "I don't want to be an island. I want to be a tourist attraction. You come, I take your money & you go."


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:20 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
Posts: 7707
Location: Surrounded by Elway, Tebow, and Manning jerseys
SalishHawkFan wrote:
Scottemojo wrote:
kf3339 wrote:

Then how do you explain the New Englund and Detroit games performance. You don't post results like that and put him in the same class as Whitehurst! Not at all.

31 other GMs, some in desperate quarterback straights, saw those same two games and did not chase after Mr. Flynn. How do you explain that he was such a bargain after those two games?

One knew they were drafting Luck. One was trying to grab RG3. One grabbed Tannehill. A couple were in the hunt for Mr. Manning. One in Florida didn't offer him as good a deal as we did. The rest already had QB's they were going with. Who would have grabbed Flynn besides Miami that didn't already have someone lined up? You aren't going to dump a QB with experience in your system for an untested FA. The Niners would have snatched up Manning, but dump Smith for Flynn? No way.


But Smith's never thrown for 6 TDs and 480 yards!!!!11!!11!!1

_________________
Image

Super Bowl XLVIII Champions


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:23 pm 
* Natural Rubbing Action *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 17585
Location: The beautiful PNW
SalishHawkFan wrote:
Flynn HAS done things to show he can succeed in the NFL, just ask Bart Starr, Bret Favre and Aaron Rodgers. He set records none of them hold.


So have Damon Huard, Charlie Batch, Paul Justin (who!?), Todd Collins, Billy Volek, and Chad Pennington. Can I ask them?

_________________
World Champion Seattle Seahawks football. It's an addiction, and there is no cure.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:29 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am
Posts: 2447
iigakusei wrote:
Could it be possible that Flynn just isnt very good?


People keep saying this. If Carroll and Schneider thought Flynn wasn't very good, then why'd they sign him and give him 10 million?

To me Flynn is a Hasselbeck type QB, not Hall of Fame material, but a serviceable QB that you can win with, and even go to the Superbowl with if all other parts of the team excel. He can read defenses, he's smart, and he can make enough plays during the course of a game to win.

But we'll never find out cause he's holding a clipboard while we throw for 120 yards a game cause we're starting a rookie QB.

_________________
If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:30 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 4258
Sgt. Largent wrote:
iigakusei wrote:
Could it be possible that Flynn just isnt very good?


People keep saying this. If Carroll and Schneider thought Flynn wasn't very good, then why'd they sign him and give him 10 million?

To me Flynn is a Hasselbeck type QB, not Hall of Fame material, but a serviceable QB that you can win with, and even go to the Superbowl with if all other parts of the team excel. He can read defenses, he's smart, and he can make enough plays during the course of a game to win.

But we'll never find out cause he's holding a clipboard while we throw for 120 yards a game cause we're starting a rookie QB.

This.

_________________
Richard Sherman doesn't just wanna get in your head, he wants to build a vacation home there.

R. Sherman: "I don't want to be an island. I want to be a tourist attraction. You come, I take your money & you go."


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:40 pm 
* Gangnameister *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 11083
Location: PoCompton, BC Canada
Sgt. Largent wrote:
iigakusei wrote:
Could it be possible that Flynn just isnt very good?


People keep saying this. If Carroll and Schneider thought Flynn wasn't very good, then why'd they sign him and give him 10 million?

To me Flynn is a Hasselbeck type QB, not Hall of Fame material, but a serviceable QB that you can win with, and even go to the Superbowl with if all other parts of the team excel. He can read defenses, he's smart, and he can make enough plays during the course of a game to win.

But we'll never find out cause he's holding a clipboard while we throw for 120 yards a game cause we're starting a rookie QB.


Because that's what it cost to get him in the door and see what he looks like in our system. Same as Charlie. Anything less and he was a Dolphin. Turns out once he was in our door and in our system, he wasn't all that impressive, but at least they took the chance. They paid the money to turn over the rock and see what was there.

If anything I think they deserve some credit for not going out of their way to pound the round peg into the square hole simply because they paid the round peg a bunch of dough. Hey, I too wanted Flynn to start while Russell sat on the bench taking "mental reps" and developing behind the scenes too (preferably as #3 on the depth chart behind Tarvaris if I had MY way), but Flynn didn't win the competition so he's the one on the bench. Tarvaris apparently shit the bed altogether so he isn't even here anymore.

And that's just the way it is. Coach weighed this and debated this much more that anyone here and coach figured that the rookie gave us the best chance to win; knowing full well that rookies will struggle and that rookies can be maddeningly inconsistent. That still speaks volumes to me, regardless of how much y'all think y'all know.

_________________
I <3 Nunchucks


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:50 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 1335
Seahawk Sailor wrote:
kf3339 wrote:
iigakusei wrote:
Do you not remember everyone saying the same thing about Whitehurst? Could it be possible that Flynn just isnt very good?


Then how do you explain the New Englund and Detroit games performance. You don't post results like that and put him in the same class as Whitehurst! Not at all.


Is that you, Michael Lombardi? If so, please say why Flynn is the better option, not just "HOLY SHORT QUARTERBACK, BATMAN!"


Simple, in those two games he showed himself to be able to read defenses, make adjustments at the line and most importantly move the offense and score points. Would it happen if he starts for us in regular games? I don't know. But I see no reason not to find out. Remember, Hass was sat down by Holmgren. He probably learned more at that point than continuing to play and get worse.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:52 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am
Posts: 2447
CANHawk wrote:
And that's just the way it is. Coach weighed this and debated this much more that anyone here and coach figured that the rookie gave us the best chance to win; knowing full well that rookies will struggle and that rookies can be maddeningly inconsistent. That still speaks volumes to me, regardless of how much y'all think y'all know.


I don't think that Schneider and Carroll thought before the season started that Wilson gave us the best chance to win in 2012.

I think they thought that Wilson has a huge upside, and that he's our QB of the future, therefore start him and hope that our defense and running game would keep us in games long enough for Wilson to develop quickly due to how smart he is and how hard he works.

The problem with this mentality is that it can take years for Wilson to develop. So yeah the upside is that in 2-3 years we might be good enough to compete for a Superbowl. The downside is we're banking on our defense and running game to still be dominant years from now.

IMO this is the NFL, you play to win NOW, not in 2-3 years. The players and fans deserve the BEST product on the field now.

_________________
If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:55 pm 
*Scott of Smacksville*
*Scott of Smacksville*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 10044
SalishHawkFan wrote:
It DOES assume the staff didn't make the right decision. Making the decision to start a rookie QB in his first year is almost invariably the WRONG decision if you have ANYONE capable of starting instead. Look at Peytons first year. Look at any elite QB's rookie year when he was thrown into the fire. The teams that do that HAVE to do that. Choice isn't an option. They picked so high in the draft because they already sucked and needed a QB.

But when you've got THREE QB's, one with extensive experience - albeit he'd never improve past mediocre - one with excellent credentials and potential who'd already shown he can succeed in the NFL and one who's a wet behind the ears QB you took in the third round, you're making a mistake to start him.

The results of that mistake are so obvious that even Kearly sees it despite how hyped up he's been about Wilson. The guy is regressing.


Starting a rookie is a gamble. But this was a move not entered into lightly, and made based on the player's potential being much higher than the next guy(Flynn) with a full understanding that the road would be bumpy. And I do not care one bit about all Flynn's years in the NFL, he had precisely as many wins as Charlie Whitehurst before coming here. 132 NFL throws is not a seasoned veteran with pelts on the wall, and the fact that he didn't wreck the Ferrari when he got to drive it against the Lions last year does not mean he can drive the Checker Marathon here in Seattle. Flynn is barely more than a rookie himself.

Last year, Pete made a point of saying that you don't really know what a QB can do until he has over 30 starts in the NFL. He said this in defense of Tarvaris, who passed the 30 start milestone during the 2011 season. Well, this preseason, what did Pete say about Tarvaris? We know what we have in Tarvaris. He really does believe that it takes two full seasons to know what you have. Of course, really crappy QBs andwer taht question a lot faster, see Charlie Whitehurst.

Think about that. Flynn had exactly a 2 start advantage on Wilson, which is now gone, by the benchmark we KNOW Pete uses.

Saying that the game in Detroit should decide if Flynn starts here is dumb beyond the pale, and as dumb as saying Wilson should start because he had the highest Lewin index score ever recorded. With a two game difference in real NFL start experience, pretending that Flynn is some kind of veteran who should have been handed the starter job is a bullshit premise based, not on knowledge of what you know, but a reaction to what you have seen and don't like. Anything has to be better than this is no way to choose your starter.

That said, I don't know if Wilson is going to be very good. I just know he won the job by doing things right both on and off the field. I know that he has made mistakes, but I also know that the flashes of talent from him are there, while he is a tick or two off on making plays, he has not been fooled be defenses as many times in 4 games as Romo got fooled by in just one game last night. Even the 3 picks on Sunday, did even one of them come from him being fooled by a defense? Nope. Not one.

I heard, and said, both of those same tired arguments with Charlie, We need to see what we have on the bench, and nothing can be worse than what we are seeing on the field right now. I was wrong. I have no real reason to assume that Pete has lost his judgement in this area in the meantime.

_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:57 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 1335
Scottemojo wrote:
kf3339 wrote:
iigakusei wrote:
Do you not remember everyone saying the same thing about Whitehurst? Could it be possible that Flynn just isnt very good?


Then how do you explain the New Englund and Detroit games performance. You don't post results like that and put him in the same class as Whitehurst! Not at all.

31 other GMs, some in desperate quarterback straights, saw those same two games and did not chase after Mr. Flynn. How do you explain that he was such a bargain after those two games?


By your token then, 32 GM's passed not once but twice on Wilson in the draft. Many had QB needs but chose NOT to pick him, including us. How do you explain that? In addition at least 10 GM's passed on him before we took him in the 3rd round. Many still had QB issues but still chose to pass. Why? Just because he was too short? It couldn't be anything else?

I don't know and neither do you!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:01 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:39 pm
Posts: 551
kf3339 wrote:
Then how do you explain the New Englund and Detroit games performance. You don't post results like that and put him in the same class as Whitehurst! Not at all.

Big numbers over a 2 game sample can be very inflated and misleading when you have several fluky plays like a RB taking a screen from behind the LOS for an 80 yard TD, a WR getting 10 yards beyond the secondary for an easy TD bomb, and WRs taking short slants through the secondary for huge gains. Those aren't plays that are likely to be repeated and don't have much predictive value for the QB's future performance.

SalishHawkFan wrote:
Scottemojo wrote:
31 other GMs, some in desperate quarterback straights, saw those same two games and did not chase after Mr. Flynn. How do you explain that he was such a bargain after those two games?

One knew they were drafting Luck. One was trying to grab RG3. One grabbed Tannehill. A couple were in the hunt for Mr. Manning. One in Florida didn't offer him as good a deal as we did. The rest already had QB's they were going with. Who would have grabbed Flynn besides Miami that didn't already have someone lined up? You aren't going to dump a QB with experience in your system for an untested FA. The Niners would have snatched up Manning, but dump Smith for Flynn? No way.

Miami, Cleveland, Kansas City. Maybe Arizona. Maybe Jacksonville if they wanted someone other than Chad Henne or David Garrard to push their struggling young QB. It should tell you something that Flynn's OC in Green Bay got a head coaching job on a team with a gaping hole at QB and didn't want him. They hadn't drafted Tannehill during Flynn's free agency, and even if they knew they were going to, Tannehill was widely considered a project who had only played QB for a couple years. I have a hard time believing Philbin would have passed on Flynn if he thought he could be really good.

Sgt. Largent wrote:
iigakusei wrote:
Could it be possible that Flynn just isnt very good?


People keep saying this. If Carroll and Schneider thought Flynn wasn't very good, then why'd they sign him and give him 10 million?

To me Flynn is a Hasselbeck type QB, not Hall of Fame material, but a serviceable QB that you can win with, and even go to the Superbowl with if all other parts of the team excel. He can read defenses, he's smart, and he can make enough plays during the course of a game to win.

But we'll never find out cause he's holding a clipboard while we throw for 120 yards a game cause we're starting a rookie QB.

Maybe they thought he could be a decent bridge QB until they could get their QBOTF. He was signed to compete with Tarvaris Jackson before Wilson was drafted. If they didn't get a potential long-term QB in the draft, they might not have been comfortable with only Jackson and Portis at the position this year. The argument of "they gave him 10 million so they need to see what they have" is the same argument as "they gave up picks for Whitehurst so they need to start him in the regular season to see what they have." Couldn't it be possible that through camp and practices, they have already seen enough to know what that don't have?

And I'm sorry, but calling Flynn a Hasselbeck type QB is absurd to me. Hasselbeck was a very good QB in his prime who carried a good offense in 2007 with no running game, no line, and one of the worst groups of receivers in the league. It's much more likely that Flynn is a Tyler Thigpen type QB than a Matt Hasselbeck type QB.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:04 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 4258
jewhawk wrote:

SalishHawkFan wrote:
Scottemojo wrote:
31 other GMs, some in desperate quarterback straights, saw those same two games and did not chase after Mr. Flynn. How do you explain that he was such a bargain after those two games?

One knew they were drafting Luck. One was trying to grab RG3. One grabbed Tannehill. A couple were in the hunt for Mr. Manning. One in Florida didn't offer him as good a deal as we did. The rest already had QB's they were going with. Who would have grabbed Flynn besides Miami that didn't already have someone lined up? You aren't going to dump a QB with experience in your system for an untested FA. The Niners would have snatched up Manning, but dump Smith for Flynn? No way.

Miami, Cleveland, Kansas City. Maybe Arizona. Maybe Jacksonville if they wanted someone other than Chad Henne or David Garrard to push their struggling young QB. It should tell you something that Flynn's OC in Green Bay got a head coaching job on a team with a gaping hole at QB and didn't want him. They hadn't drafted Tannehill during Flynn's free agency, and even if they knew they were going to, Tannehill was widely considered a project who had only played QB for a couple years. I have a hard time believing Philbin would have passed on Flynn if he thought he could be really good.


Yet they all passed over Wilson several times in the draft. So by your logic, Wilson must not have seemed too impressive either.

_________________
Richard Sherman doesn't just wanna get in your head, he wants to build a vacation home there.

R. Sherman: "I don't want to be an island. I want to be a tourist attraction. You come, I take your money & you go."


Last edited by SalishHawkFan on Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:09 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:05 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 1335
iigakusei wrote:
kf3339 wrote:
iigakusei wrote:
Do you not remember everyone saying the same thing about Whitehurst? Could it be possible that Flynn just isnt very good?


Then how do you explain the New Englund and Detroit games performance. You don't post results like that and put him in the same class as Whitehurst! Not at all.


I guess that is why there was so much demand for him in the off-season? That Detroit game was a one-off - of that I am positive. Look, I think Flynn is a good QB, but I trust the coaches that see these guys every day in practice to make the right decision.


Yes, and it is going to be their ass on the line if they screwed up the QB position again. I'm not so sure Allen will allow a full 5 years for PC to keep experimenting with that position. Even he can see what is holding this team back from being a major force.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:07 pm 
*Scott of Smacksville*
*Scott of Smacksville*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 10044
kf3339 wrote:
Scottemojo wrote:
kf3339 wrote:

Then how do you explain the New Englund and Detroit games performance. You don't post results like that and put him in the same class as Whitehurst! Not at all.

31 other GMs, some in desperate quarterback straights, saw those same two games and did not chase after Mr. Flynn. How do you explain that he was such a bargain after those two games?


By your token then, 32 GM's passed not once but twice on Wilson in the draft. Many had QB needs but chose NOT to pick him, including us. How do you explain that? In addition at least 10 GM's passed on him before we took him in the 3rd round. Many still had QB issues but still chose to pass. Why? Just because he was too short? It couldn't be anything else?

I don't know and neither do you!

I think it has been made pretty clear by very many NFL people that his height was the only reason he slipped. Who knows, it may turn out to be a very good reason. Wasn't it Kiper who said if he was taller he would be a top 10 pick? I never heard anyone disagree with that. So, yes, I do know that one.

I want whoever starts to be awesome. Flynn/Wilson/Portis, I don't care. Difference is, I think our staff has earned some trust, and you do not. Forget who is waiting in the wings, this is at the heart of the disagreement on this board. I heard this same shit with Teel. People love the backups when they think the coach is stupid.

_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:13 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am
Posts: 2447
Scottemojo wrote:
People love the backups when they think the coach is stupid.


I don't love Flynn, I just would like to see if he's good or not before we start the Russell Wilson is the best QB ever experiment.

Hell, could be they both suck, but I don't like paying a guy 10 million, then benching him for an unproven 3rd round draft pick just because he WOW'd us all in three meaningless pre-season games against 2nd and 3rd string scrubs.

All I care about is who gives us the best chance to beat the Carolina Panthers, and IMO that QB's name is Matthew Clayton Flynn.

_________________
If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:15 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:39 pm
Posts: 551
SalishHawkFan wrote:
Yet they all passed over Wilson several times in the draft. So by your logic, Wilson must not have seemed too impressive either.

Not really. There's a pretty big difference between signing a reasonably priced free agent and spending an early round draft pick on someone.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:16 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 4258
Scottemojo wrote:
I think it has been made pretty clear by very many NFL people that his height was the only reason he slipped. Who knows, it may turn out to be a very good reason. Wasn't it Kiper who said if he was taller he would be a top 10 pick? I never heard anyone disagree with that. So, yes, I do know that one.

I want whoever starts to be awesome. Flynn/Wilson/Portis, I don't care. Difference is, I think our staff has earned some trust, and you do not. Forget who is waiting in the wings, this is at the heart of the disagreement on this board. I heard this same shit with Teel. People love the backups when they think the coach is stupid.

You hit at the heart of why you and I are having a rare disagreement. I have TONS of trust in P&J to build a great defense, rushing attack, etc. But I've yet to see them make ONE move at QB that has panned out. The Whitehurst trade was terrible. TJack? Really? TJACK?!? Why let go Hass?

And if you'd believe all the people who don't want to see Flynn start, he was a lousy pick too.

Wilson might, MIGHT have potential - and I would love it if he acheives it - but I think it's a mistake to thrust him in there from the start. Flynn is an adequate QB and all we need is adequate to be a legitimate playoff contender.

I've listened to the Mariners keep telling us for a decade now that we just need to be patient a couple more years. Sorry, but the Seahawks are an adequate QB away from being dominant NOW. I'm pretty sure Flynn is at least an adequate QB. I'm pretty sure Wilson won't be adequate for another year.

I'm also seeing that my worst fears have come true: By throwing Wilson in too soon we may be wasting his potential. It happens to lots of QB's who had the misfortune of being thrust into the starting job year one. Some thrive (RG3), some don't. Wilson isn't thriving out there. He's getting worse. Even Kearly admits it. THAT, more than anything else, is why we should be starting Flynn.

_________________
Richard Sherman doesn't just wanna get in your head, he wants to build a vacation home there.

R. Sherman: "I don't want to be an island. I want to be a tourist attraction. You come, I take your money & you go."


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:17 pm 
*Scott of Smacksville*
*Scott of Smacksville*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 10044
Sgt. Largent wrote:
Scottemojo wrote:
People love the backups when they think the coach is stupid.


I don't love Flynn, I just would like to see if he's good or not before we start the Russell Wilson is the best QB ever experiment.

Hell, could be they both suck, but I don't like paying a guy 10 million, then benching him for an unproven 3rd round draft pick just because he WOW'd us all in three meaningless pre-season games against 2nd and 3rd string scrubs.

All I care about is who gives us the best chance to beat the Carolina Panthers, and IMO that QB's name is Matthew Clayton Flynn.

That is exactly what I was referring too. Coach has already seen it, your demands are because you think he is not as smart as you in these things.

Besides, I was not aware you were paying Matt Flynn. Unless you are Paul Allen, then you can say whatever you want.

_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The 4 year plan
 Post Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:18 pm 
* The Producer *
* The Producer *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 13441
Location: King In The North
Sgt. Largent wrote:
All I care about is who gives us the best chance to beat the Carolina Panthers, and IMO that QB's name is Matthew Clayton Flynn.


And yet there is basically ZERO data to back that up.

_________________
Image Image Tanzania¹² Image "ALERT THE LEGION!!!"


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 144 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]



 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.