To win SB it must be 9 in a row If we dont lose to Rams

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13

Do you want to try 9 in a row or a Rams loss

We can and will win 9 in a row with playoffs (never been done by us)
62
100%
We need to lose the Rams game so we only need to win 4 in a row
0
No votes
 
Total votes : 62

  • Interesting, for this team to win the SB assuming we all want to beat the Rams, this team needs to win 9 games in a row.

    The Hawks have never won 9 games in a row that included playoffs. The 2005 team won 11 in a row during the regular season only playing 2 teams of the 11 with a winning record.

    They then lost the last game of regular season to the 4 and 12 GB, so they only needed to win 2 games to get to the show.

    Can we do it??? On a team that is making new "firsts" in the history of the Hawks this year, is 9 in a row one of them?

    Me personaly I want and think we can win 9 in a row and 4 consecutive away games (includes SB) (assuming GB doesnt lose to the Vikings), but it is a tall order.

    Are you superstitious? Do we need to lose the last game to the Rams so we only need to win 4 in a row? I voted for 9 in a row. But others may be superstitious.


    Go Hawks
    Last edited by rainger on Tue Dec 25, 2012 5:51 pm, edited 4 times in total.
    Member of 38 Plus club. Seahawks + PC/JS + Russell Wilson = Superbowl XLVIII +
    User avatar
    rainger
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1627
    Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:32 am
    Location: Victoria BC


  • rainger wrote:Are you superstitious? Do we need to lose the last game to the Rams so we only need to win 4 in a row?


    No. This is absurd.
    User avatar
    MidwestHawker
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1256
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:26 am
    Location: Indianapolis


  • MidwestHawker wrote:
    rainger wrote:Are you superstitious? Do we need to lose the last game to the Rams so we only need to win 4 in a row?


    No. This is absurd.

    :13:
    User avatar
    Pstark3
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1428
    Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 7:08 pm
    Location: Bellevue


  • The '05 team won 11 in a row. That's more than nine in a row.
    World Champion Seattle Seahawks football. It's an addiction, and there is no cure.
    User avatar
    Seahawk Sailor
    * .NET Navy Bad Ass *
     
    Posts: 18378
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
    Location: The beautiful PNW


  • Seahawk Sailor wrote:The '05 team won 11 in a row. That's more than nine in a row.


    Yeah I was going to point out this simple fact, but you got to it first.

    The way I look at it, the longer something goes without happening, the higher the odds are of it happening. That goes for win streaks, and SUPERBOWLS.

    NEVER EVER EVER EVER tank a game, especially over something like this.
    User avatar
    bellingerga
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5310
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:28 pm
    Location: Beaverton, Oregon


  • Sorry I did say we one 10 in a row I did not say 9. it actually was 11 but we have not won 9 in a row that included playoffs. Our 11 in a row was in the middle of the season with only 2 teams with winning records. Dont get me wrong it was a great run. But for us to go 9 in a row with the competition we will face it will be the biggest accomplishment this team has ever made. I think they can do it.
    Member of 38 Plus club. Seahawks + PC/JS + Russell Wilson = Superbowl XLVIII +
    User avatar
    rainger
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1627
    Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:32 am
    Location: Victoria BC


  • Seattle won 11 in a row in 05.
    rideaducati
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1690
    Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:18 pm


  • 11 is more than 9
    It's payback, Russell Wilson falling way back
    In the draft, turn nothing into something, still can make that
    Will I
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 288
    Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 2:08 pm
    Location: Grand Forks


  • I am sorry but this thread makes absolutely no sense. The Seahawks should lay down to the Rams because the '05 team rested starters at GB in a meaningless game?

    I am moving on.
    Image

    Win Forever!
    User avatar
    JonRud
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1179
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 7:58 pm
    Location: New Jersey - Site of Super Bowl XLVIII


  • Will I wrote:11 is more than 9

    Just proves no one actually reads an entier sentence.
    Member of 38 Plus club. Seahawks + PC/JS + Russell Wilson = Superbowl XLVIII +
    User avatar
    rainger
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1627
    Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:32 am
    Location: Victoria BC


  • Well, at some point in the 11 game win streak, the Seahawks DID win 9 in a row. Without 9 in a row, 11 in a row is impossible.
    rideaducati
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1690
    Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:18 pm


  • Stop being silly.

    You only need to win 1 in a row three times.
    Image
    User avatar
    Tech Worlds
    * Capt'n Dom *
    * Capt'n Dom *
     
    Posts: 9216
    Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:40 am
    Location: Granite Falls, WA


  • Tech Worlds wrote:Stop being silly.

    You only need to win 1 in a row three times.

    ^^^THIS!!! :lol:
    Image
    "Make good teams look bad and make bad teams look terrible!" -Michael Robinson
    User avatar
    BlueTalons
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1115
    Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 11:36 am
    Location: Spanaway, WA


  • No question - beat the Rams.. keep the hot streak going.
    February 2, 2014... the day the dream was finally realized
    User avatar
    Hasselbeck
    * NET Sage *
     
    Posts: 4724
    Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm


  • Beating the Rams means San Francisco can't slip at home with Arizona.

    San Francisco might be showing it can't handle pressure in big games that really matter. A lot of their key players are on IR right now as well, and the QB carousel has to the potential to be demoralizing to them right now. Arizona, while completely out of the post season, does have a very very good defense that can topple even the best teams once in a while. Maybe the biggest key in this is whether the 49ers can recover from losing Smith, because without him in the 49er defense looked completely lost. I don't think the 49ers will be exposed to that extent, but it does mean there might be an opprotunity for someone to complete a pass for a TD to help the Cardinals defense after it scores once or twice to win the game.

    If San Francisco loses, Seattle Wins, we will only win 8 games in a row.
    Image
    User avatar
    madbohem
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 167
    Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:37 am


  • Its good practice for winning 19 in a row next season.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18506
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


  • Do I want to lose to the Rams? No way...

    User avatar
    crucifyd
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 91
    Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 4:38 am


  • I can't believe anyone thinks option B is a real option.


    But for anybody that actually does... This is the year for breaking trends and records.
    49ers webzone: Win or lose, i hope you injure Sherman. Like a serious career ending injury. I don't want him to get paid.
    49ers webzone: noise should not be the overwhelming reason a team is favored. they need to spray noise-damping foam onto the ceiling of that place.
    User avatar
    BlueTalon
    * NET Curmudgeon *
    * NET Curmudgeon *
     
    Posts: 7377
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:06 am
    Location: Eastern Washington




It is currently Sat Aug 23, 2014 12:03 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information