Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Well looks like some attention is being paid to the non call

The Essential Online Seattle Football Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. LANGUAGE: PG-13

  • The fix was in and Riveron should be renamed Bagdad Al.
    jammerhawk
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 6936
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 1:13 pm


  • Hollandhawk wrote:http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001093391/article/another-nfl-officiating-controversy-wild-card-weekend-primer

    Talks about the failing of the nfl and the new PI review rule pertaining to last night.


    You’re right, they should of made the call. OPI that is. Pete the cheat tried to run a play where they were clearing trying to get a DPI. When OPI should of been called. You got what you deserved. LOL
    Braap49er
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 19
    Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2019 1:24 pm


  • That no call was pretty much the topic on the Pat MacCaffey show and the Rich Eisen show.
    TreeRon
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1148
    Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:48 pm


  • I’m perfectly fine with it. Ball never should have been thrown. If you force a ball to a receiver that is that covered right at the 5-yard mark, there’s going to be a ton of contact. Reviewing would have meant handing the game to the Seahawks. Rewarding them such a sum for such an awful pass attempt doesn’t seem fair.
    Tical21
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4980
    Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:37 pm


  • So I see Tical responded, I have him foed. So I will take a guess....he is blaming Wilson, just like he does for everything.

    Now for reality and truth, it should have been called period it was text book interference. Without the ball is caught as the pass was there and the game is over.

    Break down of the last plays and shows cleearly of what was what

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5_4AY1uy4c

    at about the 220 mark he makes it clear what was supposed to happen and the interference prevented it.
    John63
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2768
    Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2018 2:56 pm


  • Braap49er wrote:
    Hollandhawk wrote:http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001093391/article/another-nfl-officiating-controversy-wild-card-weekend-primer

    Talks about the failing of the nfl and the new PI review rule pertaining to last night.


    You’re right, they should of made the call. OPI that is. Pete the cheat tried to run a play where they were clearing trying to get a DPI. When OPI should of been called. You got what you deserved. LOL



    Hey if you like winning on The Cheap, more power to you.
    RW92
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 265
    Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2014 3:45 pm


  • Tical21 wrote:I’m perfectly fine with it. Ball never should have been thrown. If you force a ball to a receiver that is that covered right at the 5-yard mark, there’s going to be a ton of contact. Reviewing would have meant handing the game to the Seahawks. Rewarding them such a sum for such an awful pass attempt doesn’t seem fair.



    You call this fair analysis? Lmao. Why does your bias towards Wilson run so deep?

    Russell did not “force” it to him. The ball was already in the air. If Hollister is not being grabbed he gets to extend his hands for the touchdown. No offense functions expecting a receiver to be GRABBED.

    Everyone except for 49ers fans saw it for what it is. Except for the guy who relentlessly needs an angle against Wilson.
    Scorpion05
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1368
    Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2016 11:05 am


  • Braap49er wrote:
    Hollandhawk wrote:http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001093391/article/another-nfl-officiating-controversy-wild-card-weekend-primer

    Talks about the failing of the nfl and the new PI review rule pertaining to last night.


    You’re right, they should of made the call. OPI that is. Pete the cheat tried to run a play where they were clearing trying to get a DPI. When OPI should of been called. You got what you deserved. LOL



    You know what the difference between a person with average IQ and a hack is? A hack doesn’t let facts get in the way of their opinion.

    If this had happened to your team, you’d be hollering about how the game was robbed from you. If Shaquem grabbed Debo like that, I’d be here to acknowledge we got away with one. Because that’s what rationale people do. If Hollister does not get grabbed he’s able to extend his hands for the catch. I guess trolling is better than making intelligent posts these days.
    Scorpion05
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1368
    Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2016 11:05 am


  • At the end of the day, you’ll get some calls that goes in your favor and you won’t get some calls.

    It pretty much evens out.

    It just happened to be the latter with Seattle.

    But this is what happens when the coach wants to play the game so close to the edge.

    You gonna win some this way and you gonna lose some.

    Well, if you want to increase your chances of winning, maybe don’t wait until the fourth quarter to make some moves.

    It seems like PC wants to win games based on 3 or 4 crucial plays, if you play this way you can’t afford or even leave it up to some call the officials may or may not call to decide at less than a minute left in the game, etc., to decide the outcome for you. Cause if you do so, you can get burned and it’s going to catch up to you.
    TheLegendOfBoom
    Silver Supporter
    Silver Supporter
     
    Posts: 1365
    Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 7:12 pm
    Location: Westcoastin’


  • Scorpion05 wrote:I guess trolling is better than making intelligent posts these days.


    Actually it's been that way since the dawn of the Internet. :2thumbs:
    Aros
    [[ .NET Godfather ]]
     
    Posts: 14041
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 1:58 am
    Location: Just 4 miles from Richard Sherman!



  • Braap49er wrote:
    Hollandhawk wrote:http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001093391/article/another-nfl-officiating-controversy-wild-card-weekend-primer

    Talks about the failing of the nfl and the new PI review rule pertaining to last night.


    You’re right, they should of made the call. OPI that is. Pete the cheat tried to run a play where they were clearing trying to get a DPI. When OPI should of been called. You got what you deserved. LOL

    BS. Go away troll.
    Sports Hernia
    NET Ring Of Honor
     
    Posts: 28187
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:36 pm
    Location: The pit


  • SantaClaraHawk wrote:Rapoport says Hollister pushed off first and the non-call (if called) would have been on that. Sherm agrees.

    Rapoport went on KNBR, podcast link here:

    https://www.49erswebzone.com/articles/1 ... awks-game/


    Defensive PI would of been called if Hollister hadn't initiated contact . I think they viewed it as basically off-setting fouls so they called nothing .
    xray
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2303
    Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2018 6:29 am
    Location: AZ


  • OPI should have been called??? Well, 11 days off work and it looks like nothing has changed on here :lol:
    Doom and gloom, along with some Niner trolls.

    Go Hawks!
    SoulfishHawk
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 15349
    Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 10:59 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


  • SantaClaraHawk wrote:Rapoport says Hollister pushed off first and the non-call (if called) would have been on that. Sherm agrees.

    Rapoport went on KNBR, podcast link here:

    https://www.49erswebzone.com/articles/1 ... awks-game/



    Dear God, what a pandering, idiotic take. He was mugged.

    Did the NFL slip him a cool wad o' bills to say that?

    Course niner fans get a little confirmation bias from that and run with it with glee.
    Hawkpower
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2660
    Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:53 am
    Location: Phoenix az


  • Well, the mouth of the South Sherm couldn't help but open his yapper about it. According to him, it was somehow on Hollister. Yeah right...….
    SoulfishHawk
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 15349
    Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 10:59 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


  • We had 8 downs inside the 5 and couldn't score to win the game with our Elite QB. That's why we lost.
    RCATES
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 516
    Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 10:09 am


  • The Delay of game shouldn’t have happened.

    If we want to play the blame game, it should be placed on the most appropriate thing.

    Bad calls/non calls happen all the time, and we(the team) can’t control that.

    We (the team) had 100% control over that delay of game.

    Just my opinion of course.
    pmedic920
    * .NET Official Stache *
     
    Posts: 20282
    Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:37 am
    Location: On the lake, Livingston Texas


  • RCATES wrote:We had 8 downs inside the 5 and couldn't score to win the game with our Elite QB. That's why we lost.



    I thought this thread was about the missed call, not "reasons Seattle lost"

    Not sure how 8 downs inside the 5 is relevant.
    Hawkpower
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2660
    Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:53 am
    Location: Phoenix az


  • xray wrote:Defensive PI would of been called if Hollister hadn't initiated contact . I think they viewed it as basically off-setting fouls so they called nothing .


    If they saw penalties on both sides they should have called them. Not calling them effectively takes one down (one extra attempted pass into the end zone) away from the Seahawks.
    renofox
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1000
    Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 2:20 pm
    Location: Reno, NV


  • I can't help but notice there was NO actual video of the play shown I any of these discussions. There's a reason for that when you see the actual play itself unfold it's a complete mugging of Hollister. The dude wraps both arms around Hollister making it impossible for him to catch the ball.
    Northwest Seahawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1583
    Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2015 5:10 pm




It is currently Mon May 25, 2020 8:10 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ SEATTLE SEAHAWKS FOOTBALL ]




Information
  • Who is online