Jarran Reed & Nick Vannett out vs Oakland

Jville

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
13,187
Reaction score
1,549
[tweet]https://twitter.com/scohenPI/status/769986526780481536[/tweet]

[tweet]https://twitter.com/DavisHsuSeattle/status/769986579775516672[/tweet]
 
OP
OP
J

Jville

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
13,187
Reaction score
1,549
Sorry ....... Jarran Reed and Nick Vannett are out vs Oakland. Both are questionable for week 1.

Tanner McEvoy is highly questionable vs Oakland.

Pete Carroll has announced that roster cuts will not officially be made public until Tuesday. However, that process has begun.
 

HawkGA

New member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
107,412
Reaction score
1
That hurts Tanner's chances of making the final 53, I would think. I've long figured him for a PS person anyway (not that my opinion means crap since I don't actually watch the games . . . of course, even if I did watch the games my opinion still wouldn't mean crap). The real question for him is probably whether there are any other wide receivers who have shown enough to be worthwhile on the 53.

Bummer about Reed, but I suspect getting him right and having him back for the Rams is more important than having him against the Dolphins.
 
OP
OP
J

Jville

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
13,187
Reaction score
1,549
^^^ Everyone's thoughts matter.

Everyday is an opportunity to grow and learn about our favorite team.

Go Hawks!
 

Seahawkfan80

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
11,207
Reaction score
615
HawkGA":28e9awsh said:
That hurts Tanner's chances of making the final 53, I would think. I've long figured him for a PS person anyway (not that my opinion means crap since I don't actually watch the games . . . of course, even if I did watch the games my opinion still wouldn't mean crap). The real question for him is probably whether there are any other wide receivers who have shown enough to be worthwhile on the 53.

Bummer about Reed, but I suspect getting him right and having him back for the Rams is more important than having him against the Dolphins.

Sorry, but I gotta laugh out of this one.....hope you dont mind.

Your opinion, like my opinion, means crap. Finally I am equal with someone. LOL :twisted: :stirthepot:
 

kearly

New member
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
15,975
Reaction score
0
Don't rush them back, we'll be fine without them against Miami. The Miami rushing attack is nothing special and Luke Willson can chip for Sowell.
 

Laloosh

New member
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
8,688
Reaction score
0
Location
WA
Jville":1hho3xcm said:
^^^ Everyone's thoughts matter.

Everyday is an opportunity to grow and learn about our favorite team.

Go Hawks!

Go :icon_new:!
 

Laloosh

New member
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
8,688
Reaction score
0
Location
WA
Jville":1aaa2rlg said:
Sorry ....... Jarran Reed and Nick Vannett are out vs Oakland. Both are questionable for week 1.

Tanner McEvoy is highly questionable vs Oakland.

Pete Carroll has announced that roster cuts will not officially be made public until Tuesday. However, that process has begun.

Thanks!

Bummer though...
 

Overseasfan

New member
Joined
May 13, 2015
Messages
1,167
Reaction score
0
Location
The Netherlands
kearly":1czuj06s said:
Don't rush them back, we'll be fine without them against Miami. The Miami rushing attack is nothing special and Luke Willson can chip for Sowell.

Or get Brandon Williams into the line up because he has proven to be just as good of a blocker as Vannett if not better.
 
OP
OP
J

Jville

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
13,187
Reaction score
1,549
As a housekeeping correction, Vannett was, as I recall, a third round pick.

With Graham and Vannett both working their way back from injury, I expect to see 4 tight ends on the roster going into week one.
 

Basis4day

Active member
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
5,924
Reaction score
0
Bigpumpkin":1bkhn6ca said:
Reed was our #2 Pick. Vannett was our #4 Pick. Reed is probably safe for the 53 man roster. Vannett might make the PS.

Can you elaborate on your thinking? The only way Reed misses the 53 is if he is IR'd.

You don't cut a player and try and sign him to the PS if you're reasonably certain he won't get picked up by another team. As with Reed, the only way Vannett misses the 53 is if he is IR'd. He wouldn't make it to the PS.
 

Bigpumpkin

Active member
Joined
Mar 4, 2007
Messages
8,030
Reaction score
3
Location
Puyallup, WA USA
Basis4day":nlqr74ye said:
Bigpumpkin":nlqr74ye said:
Reed was our #2 Pick. Vannett was our #4 Pick. Reed is probably safe for the 53 man roster. Vannett might make the PS.

Can you elaborate on your thinking? The only way Reed misses the 53 is if he is IR'd.

You don't cut a player and try and sign him to the PS if you're reasonably certain he won't get picked up by another team. As with Reed, the only way Vannett misses the 53 is if he is IR'd. He wouldn't make it to the PS.

Vannett may have been a Round 3 pick....but he was our 4th pick in the Draft. Vannett just hasn't shown me that "it" factor which I think is necessary to be on our Receiving Corps. We'll know by September 4th or 5th exactly who makes the 53 man squad....that is just a week away. We will be saying "Bye, Bye" to several really good players....many of whom will be selected by other NFL teams.
 

Basis4day

Active member
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
5,924
Reaction score
0
Bigpumpkin":2qj4ovnj said:
Basis4day":2qj4ovnj said:
Bigpumpkin":2qj4ovnj said:
Reed was our #2 Pick. Vannett was our #4 Pick. Reed is probably safe for the 53 man roster. Vannett might make the PS.

Can you elaborate on your thinking? The only way Reed misses the 53 is if he is IR'd.

You don't cut a player and try and sign him to the PS if you're reasonably certain he won't get picked up by another team. As with Reed, the only way Vannett misses the 53 is if he is IR'd. He wouldn't make it to the PS.

Vannett may have been a Round 3 pick....but he was our 4th pick in the Draft. Vannett just hasn't shown me that "it" factor which I think is necessary to be on our Receiving Corps. We'll know by September 4th or 5th exactly who makes the 53 man squad....that is just a week away. We will be saying "Bye, Bye" to several really good players....many of whom will be selected by other NFL teams.

So only players that jump off the screen have a real chance? Receiving Corp? He's a highly drafted TE on a run first team when you need blocking ability you won't be getting in Graham. And that doesn't answer my initial question about how you see him making the PS. The team would IR him. Not try and get him to the ps.
 

MontanaHawk05

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
17,888
Reaction score
404
Bigpumpkin":2n1jnth4 said:
Reed was our #2 Pick. Vannett was our #4 Pick. Reed is probably safe for the 53 man roster. Vannett might make the PS.

You don't PS a third-round pick in his rookie season when he might not even miss Week 1.
 

Ozzy

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
9,289
Reaction score
3,816
Reed and Vannett are locks for the roster this year.
 

2_0_6

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2013
Messages
3,540
Reaction score
0
Location
South Seattle
Bigpumpkin":4q7yrt02 said:
As I said...we'll find out in a week! :177692:

Even if both are slated to miss week 1, they both are on the 53. I guaranteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee it.
 
Top