Paul Richardson.

The Essential Online Seattle Football Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. LANGUAGE RATING: PG-13
Re: Paul Richardson.
Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:46 am
  • I am the same height and weight as Richardson. It is so weird to me that he is in the NFL on that fact alone.

    3 ACLs in his life. Hamstring issues. Bad wheels are kind a big deal at his position.
    Scottemojo
    *Scott of Smacksville*
     
    Posts: 14663
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:14 am


Re: Paul Richardson.
Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:46 am
  • Scottemojo wrote:I am the same height and weight as Richardson. It is so weird to me that he is in the NFL on that fact alone.

    3 ACLs in his life. Hamstring issues. Bad wheels are kind a big deal at his position.

    Yes but you have muscles
    Tech Worlds
    * Capt'n Dom *
     
    Posts: 11240
    Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:40 am
    Location: Granite Falls, WA


Re: Paul Richardson.
Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:56 am
  • Tech Worlds wrote:
    Scottemojo wrote:I am the same height and weight as Richardson. It is so weird to me that he is in the NFL on that fact alone.

    3 ACLs in his life. Hamstring issues. Bad wheels are kind a big deal at his position.

    Yes but you have muscles

    I think the Hawks fib a bit on Richardson's weight. I think they list him around 185 or something like that.
    Scottemojo
    *Scott of Smacksville*
     
    Posts: 14663
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:14 am


Re: Paul Richardson.
Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:40 pm
  • I think this was a bad pick. I never saw Richardson display 'game speed'. The guy is fast on the track, not on the field. And he's fragile. Think about this, we could have gotten Martavis Bryant in that draft instead of Richardson. Now THAT would have been fun to see!
    xgeoff
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1357
    Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2014 4:45 pm


Re: Paul Richardson.
Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:26 pm
  • xgeoff wrote:I think this was a bad pick. I never saw Richardson display 'game speed'. The guy is fast on the track, not on the field. And he's fragile. Think about this, we could have gotten Martavis Bryant in that draft instead of Richardson. Now THAT would have been fun to see!


    Im perplexed by this statement. Richardson looks really quick at game speed in my opinion.
    fridayfrenzy
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 336
    Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:33 pm


Re: Paul Richardson.
Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:41 pm
  • To me, the talent isn't the issue. He's displayed a surprisingly complete game and a degree of toughness you also didn't expect. Pair him with a more in-stride thrower, and I think he's getting deep often. And Russ has been getting better and better at that, too.

    Durability is a legit question now. Also, he's probably too small to play anywhere on Specials, and Lockett took his return/WR job. So, can you justify activating him if he's only playing non-starter snaps? Can his body hold up to a full load of reps and the blocking responsibilities that come with it?

    That said, if spread is really the offense of the future, you have to like the idea of having Richardson, Baldwin, Lockett and Graham on the field at the same time.
    DavidSeven
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5742
    Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:15 am


Re: Paul Richardson.
Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:23 pm
  • David the idea of having those 4 on the field at the same time is scary. Really hope Richardson gets a chance to show his talent. Lockett and Richardson on the outside with Graham, Baldwin etc in the middle is almost ideal. Going to be a fun few years for this offense.

    I wouldn't put it past Pete to add another WR early in the draft if a player they love falls.
    austinslater25
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3343
    Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 3:05 pm
    Location: Tri-Cities, Washington


Re: Paul Richardson.
Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:25 pm
  • who? :D
    m0ng0
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3357
    Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:55 pm
    Location: The Shoug


Re: Paul Richardson.
Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:10 pm
  • xgeoff wrote:Think about this, we could have gotten Martavis Bryant in that draft instead of Richardson. Now THAT would have been fun to see!


    Maybe yes, maybe no. We don't have the weapons Pittsburgh does on offense. A big reason Martavis is so deadly is because defenses are on their heels immediately from Antonio Brown and when healthy Leveon Bell.

    Allen Robinson is the guy I coveted and the guy we should have selected. Dude can flat play.
    Hasselbeck
    * NET Sage *
     
    Posts: 11397
    Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 5:55 pm


Re: Paul Richardson.
Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:09 pm
  • SomersetHawk wrote:I'm quietly confident that Paul can contribute consistently in 2016.

    From reports and indeed the albeit very limited evidence it appeared that Paul had recovered well from his surgery. The hamstring injury smacked of a guy being rushed back into physical activity, it's a common injury for explosive athletes making comebacks from long lay-offs. A full pre-season should serve him well.


    Much like DeSean Jackson and Percy Harvin.
    ivotuk
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 18737
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:29 pm
    Location: North Pole, Alaska


Re: Paul Richardson.
Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:14 pm
  • fridayfrenzy wrote:
    xgeoff wrote:I think this was a bad pick. I never saw Richardson display 'game speed'. The guy is fast on the track, not on the field. And he's fragile. Think about this, we could have gotten Martavis Bryant in that draft instead of Richardson. Now THAT would have been fun to see!


    Im perplexed by this statement. Richardson looks really quick at game speed in my opinion.


    Friday frenzy, I'm mesmerized by your avatar. I keep seeing things moving around in there. It's like they're trying to tell me something. I think it's "Seahawks win multiple SuperB Owls." Or maybe it's "Seagulls have loose bowels." Hard to tell. :3-1:
    ivotuk
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 18737
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:29 pm
    Location: North Pole, Alaska


Re: Paul Richardson.
Sat Jan 23, 2016 2:43 am
  • Richardson can ball. But until he can prove that he can be healthy, he's a wildcard - a novelty, of sorts.

    His frame doesn't bode well for a long NFL career.

    Moving forward, I'm not counting on the kid, but anything he gives us is pure gravy. It wasn't the best pick to select him so early, but I can see why the FO did. The talent is there; the health may not be. He's young, and he can still have a very good career and be a part of this offense. But so far, he's been made of glass, and that sucks to say.

    I'm on the Paul Richardson train, but my odds aren't good.
    Rob12
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2688
    Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:50 am
    Location: Dayton, WA


Re: Paul Richardson.
Sat Jan 23, 2016 6:07 am
  • Saw Paul the other day. He's recovering well.
    uploadfromtaptalk1453554419467.jpg
    uploadfromtaptalk1453554419467.jpg (52.89 KiB) Viewed 792 times
    Tech Worlds
    * Capt'n Dom *
     
    Posts: 11240
    Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:40 am
    Location: Granite Falls, WA


Re: Paul Richardson.
Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:14 am
  • That guy has 20 lbs on Richardson. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
    penihawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 524
    Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:11 am


Re: Paul Richardson.
Wed Jan 27, 2016 12:52 pm
  • He's cheap and talented. Very nice player to have around to compete for game reps. If he's healthy, he's easily the 3rd most talented wide receiver on the team.

    I don't really understand these people who want to dump young, cheap players because they're injury prone. Every once in a while those guys stay healthy for a year or two and REALLY make you better (see Walter Thurmond)

    Personally, I'm hoping we have two of those guys next year in Richardson and Tharold Simon.
    Mojambo
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1650
    Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 1:38 pm


Re: Paul Richardson.
Wed Jan 27, 2016 12:55 pm
  • It's easy to lament a draft pick years later. The fact is, most didn't expect him back this year. Watch him kick ass next year.
    Largent80
    NET Ring Of Honor
     
    Posts: 34660
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 1:38 pm


Re: Paul Richardson.
Wed Jan 27, 2016 1:10 pm
  • jlwaters1 wrote:
    McGruff wrote:
    Barthawk wrote:too early.. he was starting to make plays late in the year including the play he tore his ACL.

    Now, Chris McIntosh was a waste of pick.


    That is really quite ironic since their stories are very similar.

    McIntosh started 10 games as a rookie, and towards the end of his rookie season was developing into a dominant right tackle. One of the best. Then an injury derailed his career and he was never able to come back.

    In fact, Chris would probably be LESS of a bust than Richardson because Chris' injury was a very isolated incident. He had no significant injury history prior to his pro career, whereas Richardson had significant injuries in college.

    Evaluating them both based on their 1st two years, Chris was far more productive.


    This makes zero sense.. P-Rich was a mid-2nd round pick, the expectations between the 2 are completely different. Chris was pick 22, P-Rich was pick 45.


    Expectations are useless
    mrt144
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4069
    Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 2:21 pm


Re: Paul Richardson.
Wed Jan 27, 2016 8:57 pm
  • Largent80 wrote:It's easy to lament a draft pick years later. The fact is, most didn't expect him back this year. Watch him kick ass next year.

    I hope so. I want him to succeed.
    Scottemojo
    *Scott of Smacksville*
     
    Posts: 14663
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:14 am


Re: Paul Richardson.
Wed Jan 27, 2016 9:47 pm
  • Doug, Jimmy, Tyler, Paul and Thomas will make an awesome receiving crew. Excited about 2016.
    Seafan
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5973
    Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:30 pm
    Location: Helotes, TX


Re: Paul Richardson.
Wed Jan 27, 2016 10:39 pm
  • I'm afraid Paul Richardson might go down another Hawks path.
    Deon Butler.

    I hope Paul can shake the injury bug and get his career going.
    TheHawkster
    * NET Bad Ass *
     
    Posts: 2277
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 1:00 am
    Location: Puyallup


Re: Paul Richardson.
Thu Jan 28, 2016 6:11 am
  • Besides role playing as a receiver, i hope he can work his way to being a legitimate kick returner.

    While Lockett could certainly still be the go to option in the playoffs, lockett is just becoming too valuable of a receiver. These playoffs had him making big play after big play, and i seriously question our ability to run and gun if he's out of the picture due to a freak return injury, which might be the most dangerous play in all of sports.
    Optimus25
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1614
    Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 8:16 pm


Re: Paul Richardson.
Thu Jan 28, 2016 11:30 am
  • To me, the hamstring injury Richardson suffered in 2015 is swaying perception of him too much. It was his first play back after an 10 month layoff, no training camp, no preseason, etc. It could happen to any player coming off that kind of layoff. Hamstrings have full recovery too without lasting effects.

    In the NFL, Richardson has had one major injury. In college, he had a couple, but people should have known that when he was drafted (I wasn't a fan of the pick).

    The 2016 season is Richardson's chance to start fresh. The 2014 knee injury should be 100% healed, and he'll be starting the year in TC / preseason which will help him acclimate to the NFL season in a healthy way.

    And if Seattle keeps Kearse, it puts Richardson in a good place to rehab his career, as a #4 WR who eases his way in.

    Richardson is of course an elevated injury risk, but anyone that did the research on him coming out of college should have expected this. And even injury prone WR don't get IR'd every season, unless your name is DJ Hackett.

    I'm excited for Richardson's 2016 season. Health aside, I think he fits the current offense like a glove.
    kearly
    * Mr Random Thought *
     
    Posts: 15975
    Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 2:44 am


Re: Paul Richardson.
Thu Jan 28, 2016 11:37 am
  • kearly wrote:To me, the hamstring injury Richardson suffered in 2015 is swaying perception of him too much. It was his first play back after an 10 month layoff, no training camp, no preseason, etc. It could happen to any player coming off that kind of layoff. Hamstrings have full recovery too without lasting effects.

    In the NFL, Richardson has had one major injury. In college, he had a couple, but people should have known that when he was drafted (I wasn't a fan of the pick).

    The 2016 season is Richardson's chance to start fresh. The 2014 knee injury should be 100% healed, and he'll be starting the year in TC / preseason which will help him acclimate to the NFL season in a healthy way.

    And if Seattle keeps Kearse, it puts Richardson in a good place to rehab his career, as a #4 WR who eases his way in.

    Richardson is of course an elevated injury risk, but anyone that did the research on him coming out of college should have expected this. And even injury prone WR don't get IR'd every season, unless your name is DJ Hackett.

    I'm excited for Richardson's 2016 season. Health aside, I think he fits the current offense like a glove.


    I agree on this throughout, but especially the last sentence. Baldwin, Lockett and Richardson are all leg tying rouote runners with plus speed.
    McGruff
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 4386
    Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:14 am
    Location: Elma, WA


Re: Paul Richardson.
Thu Jan 28, 2016 11:45 am
  • PR is still pretty cheap, so it doesn't hurt much to keep him on the roster. He was making some plays before the first injury, and yeah, the hamstring is hardly surprising for almost any player just coming back in the middle of the season. Not to mention, we were a bit desperate to get some WR's on the field at the time IIRC. He may have been somewhat rushed back.

    :229031_shrug:
    sutz
    USMC 1970-77
     
    Posts: 16220
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 1:41 am
    Location: Kent, WA


Re: Paul Richardson.
Thu Jan 28, 2016 12:55 pm
  • The main comparison between Richardson and Lockett were that they singlehandedly carried their respective teams on offense in college. Every year, ASU would play Colorado before the Pac-12 realignment, and every year, he was the only guy who would do anything at all against us and keep the game close for at least a half.

    He might never be completely right because of his ACLs, but he's worth it at his cost because when he is healthy, he will open up the field. He was just starting to get it as he got hurt, and I believe that he'll adjust and, assuming he hasn't massively lost explosiveness due to the injury, he'll be worth the 8-10 games the team gets out of him.
    Smelly McUgly
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4282
    Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 3:30 pm
    Location: God's Country AKA Cascadia AKA The Pacific Northwest


Re: Paul Richardson.
Thu Jan 28, 2016 2:57 pm
  • Price is right. Upside is high. Risk is high.

    No reason to jettison him. I don't see him getting a 2nd deal here. But that's a discussion for 2018.

    He was becoming a high impact player for us. There is plenty to be excited about for 2016.
    Attyla the Hawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2262
    Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:38 pm


Re: Paul Richardson.
Tue Aug 14, 2018 7:38 pm
  • The Prosise thread got me thinking about a former Hawk who used to get the same treatment. I'm not saying it's not deserved, as he has done very little to make us think otherwise. Just saying, it is possible to "shake the injury bug" and ballout.

    *Sidenote* - This thread sure has allot of former greatness (members) in it.
    Mistashoesta
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1636
    Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 5:22 am


Re: Paul Richardson.
Tue Aug 14, 2018 11:40 pm
  • PRich did it for one year. I expected Washington to have a lot of buyer's remorse.
    HawkGA
    NET Hall Of Famer
     
    Posts: 106131
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 1:29 pm


Previous


It is currently Sat Jul 20, 2019 7:15 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information
  • Who is online