STAND IN THE POCKET AND THROW THE BALL

rightbench · Nov 23, 2014

I don't care how bad our O line play supposedly is. 1 play out of every series Mr Wilson, stand in the pocket and either throw the ball or take the sack.

You're not a running back and it's getting harder to watch you play right now.

rightbench · Nov 23, 2014

thank you. that was beautiful

Russ Willstrong · Nov 23, 2014

Stand in the pocket and....get sacked?
This scrambling qb is getting old...but keeping our hopes alive. Where is our running threat without RW?

GeekHawk · Nov 23, 2014

QB rating of 121.6, and it's getting old? Really? :roll:

NJSeahawk · Nov 23, 2014

Winning never gets old :th2thumbs:

SeaChase · Nov 23, 2014

GeekHawk":3bxstp3v said:
QB rating of 121.6, and it's getting old? Really? :roll:

Wilson's best game of the year and he had under 200 yards throwing and 6 sacks and you want to point out his Qb rating?

SeaChase · Nov 23, 2014

SeaChase":23uplo5p said:
GeekHawk":23uplo5p said:

QB rating of 121.6, and it's getting old? Really? :roll:

Click to expand...

Wilson's best game of the year and he had under 200 yards passing and 6 sacks and you want to point out his Qb rating?

Seahawker86 · Nov 23, 2014

Defense wins championships

Anthony! · Nov 23, 2014

SeaChase":3c609ej3 said:
GeekHawk":3c609ej3 said:

QB rating of 121.6, and it's getting old? Really? :roll:

Click to expand...

Wilson's best game of the year and he had under 200 yards throwing and 6 sacks and you want to point out his Qb rating?

Well we could go with his 9.4 YPA, his td, his 70+ complt%, his 73 yard rushing, etc. The point was to point out the OP, that he is wrong. You do not stand in the pocket, when there is one, just to stand there. You stay there as long as you can, and if no one is open you leave when you have to and make plays. That is what a duel threat QB gives you. Without RWs running we loose to day period

IndyHawk · Nov 23, 2014

kthebestwayw":y7za78g8 said:
Defense wins championships

:13: :thirishdrinkers: :13:

Grahamhawker · Nov 23, 2014

Realistically, it was a pretty funny post.

Any more "standing in the pocket" and 6 sacks could have doubled.

I think "how about taking advantage of a hot read when they blitz?" would be a better question. But many times there may not have been time for even that.

davidonmi · Nov 23, 2014

SeaChase":3uepv4yt said:
GeekHawk":3uepv4yt said:

QB rating of 121.6, and it's getting old? Really? :roll:

Click to expand...

Wilson's best game of the year and he had under 200 yards throwing and 6 sacks and you want to point out his Qb rating?

best game of the year?
Washington? St Lous? and YPA > passing yards
he still has work to do though

Natethegreat · Nov 23, 2014

Russel played very well today and blaming him for six sacks is down right idiotic.

MontanaHawk05 · Nov 23, 2014

Natethegreat":3ikogg4l said:
Russel played very well today and blaming him for six sacks is down right idiotic.

QB is almost always responsible for at least some sacks.

Russ Willstrong · Nov 23, 2014

SeaChase":pp5mf6mb said:
GeekHawk":pp5mf6mb said:

QB rating of 121.6, and it's getting old? Really? :roll:

Click to expand...

Wilson's best game of the year and he had under 200 yards throwing and 6 sacks and you want to point out his Qb rating?

Using simple arithmetic I've determined for you that 211 is indeed OVER 200 yds. (Just in case you'd like to revise your post for accuracy.)
Not to pick nits but at times your posts are lousy. I.e. "Wilson's best game of the year".. it was not.

Spin Doctor · Nov 23, 2014

MontanaHawk05":2s2f5hen said:
Natethegreat":2s2f5hen said:

Russel played very well today and blaming him for six sacks is down right idiotic.

Click to expand...

QB is almost always responsible for at least some sacks.

Exactly, Wilson was getting time today, he just wasn't getting rid of the ball, at least two of those sacks could be directly attributed to Wilson.

Natethegreat · Nov 23, 2014

MontanaHawk05":2e2ht004 said:
Natethegreat":2e2ht004 said:

Russel played very well today and blaming him for six sacks is down right idiotic.

Click to expand...

QB is almost always responsible for at least some sacks.

I will grant you that some times that is the case but I remember one sack that was on Russ and it was a loss of two yards when no one was open. he should have thrown it away. other than that he was really really good today. His line was not, especially in the first half.

Natethegreat · Nov 23, 2014

Spin Doctor":3g5q3lld said:
MontanaHawk05":3g5q3lld said:

Natethegreat":3g5q3lld said:

Russel played very well today and blaming him for six sacks is down right idiotic.

Click to expand...

QB is almost always responsible for at least some sacks.

Click to expand...

Exactly, Wilson was getting time today, he just wasn't getting rid of the ball, at least two of those sacks could be directly attributed to Wilson.

When Russel got time he delivered the ball. So yeah he got a few good pockets but that doesn't negate the fact his pocket was collapsing immediately on almost half the pass plays(not counting screens either).

Grahamhawker · Nov 23, 2014

Spin Doctor":ajyg5j59 said:
MontanaHawk05":ajyg5j59 said:

Natethegreat":ajyg5j59 said:

Russel played very well today and blaming him for six sacks is down right idiotic.

Click to expand...

QB is almost always responsible for at least some sacks.

Click to expand...

Exactly, Wilson was getting time today, he just wasn't getting rid of the ball, at least two of those sacks could be directly attributed to Wilson.

You realize that QBs that constantly throw the ball away find it difficult to run for 73 yards and pick up crutial first downs, right?

GeekHawk · Nov 23, 2014

SeaChase":3jzhs7dy said:
SeaChase":3jzhs7dy said:

When I think about you, I quote myself...

[/]

Click to expand...

STAND IN THE POCKET AND THROW THE BALL

New member

New member

New member

Well-known member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Member

New member

Well-known member

Well-known member

New member

Well-known member

Well-known member

New member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Similar threads