Stanford vs Washington

Discuss your thoughts about anything draft related. Mocks, College and Pro. Knock yourselves out!!! RATING: PG-13
Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:50 pm
  • Spounge84 wrote:
    JSeahawks wrote:Ball hit the grass. Sorry.


    Doesn't matter as long as Smith had control of it, which to me it appeared he did.


    Yes it does, because it hit the grass before it hit his arms. It was lying on the ground between his arms then he scooped it up.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18701
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:51 pm
  • God I hate these refs, and I hate our special teams. Good night sirs.
    |~=[==~||~==]=~|
    ||Tfs LnD ] [ HAWKS||
    RIP BFS. He was kind of a douche, but he was our kind of a douche.
    User avatar
    ClumsyLurk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1702
    Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:51 pm
  • oh that's phreaking bull####!!!!!!!!!
    mrblitz
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1114
    Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 10:34 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:51 pm
  • Damn. That's a crusher.
    Image
    User avatar
    Maelstrom787
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1412
    Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 12:38 pm
    Location: Delaware


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:51 pm
  • phyreaking @@@@oles
    mrblitz
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1114
    Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 10:34 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:51 pm
  • Not enough to overturn if those are the only angles. Not indisputable.
    User avatar
    DavidSeven
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4075
    Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:15 am


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:52 pm
  • screw that bullshit, there wasn't enough evidence to overturn that
    The LOLs of the many outweigh the shame of the few
    User avatar
    Msfann
    *BRONZE SUPPORTER*
    *BRONZE SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 1446
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:37 am


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:52 pm
  • DavidSeven wrote:Not enough to overturn if those are the only angles. Not indisputable.


    The angle from behind it was obvious.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18701
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:52 pm
  • Makeup call for "confirmed" catch where half of the receiver's body was dragging out of bounds before a single thread touched in bounds.
    Image
    User avatar
    minormillikin
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1882
    Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 12:32 pm
    Location: East Oly


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:52 pm
  • Didn't see it definitively hit the ground, they must have had a different camera angle, feel like the Huskies kind of got hosed there.
    User avatar
    seahawk2k
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1652
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:41 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:53 pm
  • Yeah, that's crazy to reverse the call w/ those angles. No idea how they had the balls to do that. ASJ kinda hosed us on that drive...
    Last edited by Laloosh on Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
    Marvin49 wrote:Ok. I have to admit. That's messed up.

    You win.
    User avatar
    Laloosh
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4273
    Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:46 pm
    Location: WA


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:54 pm
  • They should have left it how they called it. There was not enough evidence to support that it hit the ground. Oh well, great game by the Dawgs. Oregon next.
    User avatar
    CallMeADawg
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 597
    Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:24 am


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:55 pm
  • Great game. Fun thread. I like you guys. Too bad I have to hate you for the next week.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18701
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:55 pm
  • The allegedly great TE ASJ should have caught the easy pass instead of relying on the 4th down play. Hit the ground anyways.

    4-1
    cesame
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1669
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:36 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:56 pm
  • This isn't a conversation if ASJ makes that catch.
    User avatar
    seahawk2k
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1652
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:41 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:57 pm
  • Robbed.

    Why do Pac 12 refs suck so freaking bad? year after year it's a joke.

    Here's a hint for the Pac 12 refs: if a player is REALLY injured and not just faking it because they can't keep up with the offense, they dont roll around on the ground like a child in a sand box, repeatedly putting their weight on a possible injury. They lay prone not moving because movign makes it hurt. and if they are in such pain that they are writhing around on the ground,t hey aren't going to be ready to go in after one play off.

    get it together.

    but most importantly, this:

    This isn't a conversation if ASJ makes that catch.
    Image
    User avatar
    Hawknballs
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2878
    Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 10:51 am


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:59 pm
  • Special teams is directly responsible for 7 (I count 14) points today. Shouldn't have been down to begin with.

    And the refs. OHHH goodness the refs. I believe it was in the 2nd quarter we had that filthy block on special teams called a personal foul. That was atrocious. As was their presence the entire first half the of the game.
    |~=[==~||~==]=~|
    ||Tfs LnD ] [ HAWKS||
    RIP BFS. He was kind of a douche, but he was our kind of a douche.
    User avatar
    ClumsyLurk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1702
    Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:59 pm
  • This team's going to be pissed off for next week's game against Oregon.
    Image
    You are absolutely entitled to state your opinion whenever you wish, and I am absolutely entitled to point out the stupidity of that opinion with the same frequency.
    User avatar
    SeatownJay
    * NET Staff Alumni *
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 6880
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:38 pm
    Location: Hagerstown, MD


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:00 pm
  • SeatownJay wrote:This team's going to be pissed off for next week's game against Oregon.


    They will be really screwed if they have to play vs Oregon and the bs ref's again.
    The LOLs of the many outweigh the shame of the few
    User avatar
    Msfann
    *BRONZE SUPPORTER*
    *BRONZE SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 1446
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:37 am


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:01 pm
  • Definitely thought there wasn't enough evidence to overturn that. We shouldn't have even needed a 4th down conversion though because ASJ should've caught that pass. :229031_banghead:
    Tru2RedNGold25 wrote:Us as Niners fan have every right to rep Niners all day everyday when we have the hardware to back it up do can u guys say that???


    2013 Adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug
    2014 Adopt-a-rookie: Kevin Norwood
    User avatar
    razgriz737
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1816
    Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
    Location: Spokane/Seattle


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:02 pm
  • We wont have time to be inept like we were today to still hang with the evil empire. Play like today and we'll be down by 21+ in the 2nd quarter.
    |~=[==~||~==]=~|
    ||Tfs LnD ] [ HAWKS||
    RIP BFS. He was kind of a douche, but he was our kind of a douche.
    User avatar
    ClumsyLurk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1702
    Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:03 pm
  • The Ducks game is at home. We will come out and play well.
    User avatar
    CallMeADawg
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 597
    Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:24 am


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:05 pm
  • Holy shit. Why bother playing the game when the goddamn outcome is predetermined by the Pac 12? That so-called "official review" was ludicrous. What does it mean to be out of challenges, when the league has your frickin' back?!?
    User avatar
    GeekHawk
    US Navy ET Nuc
     
    Posts: 4172
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:29 pm
    Location: Orting WA, Great Northwet


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:10 pm
  • Personally I thought the ball hit the grass before it was controlled, by the back angle at-least. Tough way for it to end. You guys played a hell of a game though.
    Image
    User avatar
    jhern87
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 112
    Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 1:38 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:23 pm
  • While I could very easily argue there wasn't enough evidence to overturn the call, thus making it a bad call, I would bet anybody 100/1 that the ball hit the ground first, so I can't bring myself to complain about it.

    The Huskies are the better team, I have no doubt, but made wayyyy too many mistakes. How many dumb penalties? How many drops? Four bad plays in the kicking game. Tonight was proof that no matter how incredible of a game you play, you can't beat a good team when you can't limit the mistakes.

    I want #7 for Stanford on the Hawks.

    Bring on the zeroes.
    "So between my friends and I we have been at every home game to date this year, and we have all been plotting the offensive plays called. " ------Anthony!
    User avatar
    Tical21
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1546
    Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 6:37 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:28 pm
  • the call should've stood but TBH the game shouldn't have come down to it, stupid decisions to pooch kick, kickoff coverage, penalties, and dropped passes cost UW this game
    User avatar
    davidonmi
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1771
    Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 4:20 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:40 pm
  • Good game all, time to get pumped up for the Hawks game tomorrow. These Dawgs are only getting better.
    User avatar
    CallMeADawg
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 597
    Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:24 am


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:48 pm
  • The ball clearly hit the ground between his hands. It was the correct call. The refs didn't cost the game, it was dropped balls and special teams.
    Street
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 32
    Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:20 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sun Oct 06, 2013 12:20 am
  • It may have hit the ground but I didn't see enough evidence to overturn it. Even on a 60" plasma you could see ball but nothing to prove without a doubt that it touched.

    And that's the problem they have to know for sure to overturn it and you can't say for 100% sure that it did touch. They got hosed.

    If the ruling on the field originally was that it was dropped and then the replay came back saying it hit the ground that would have been fine. But the original call was a catch and there just wasn't enough proof to overrule the ruling on the field.
    The LOLs of the many outweigh the shame of the few
    User avatar
    Msfann
    *BRONZE SUPPORTER*
    *BRONZE SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 1446
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:37 am


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sun Oct 06, 2013 2:23 am
  • Msfann wrote:It may have hit the ground but I didn't see enough evidence to overturn it. Even on a 60" plasma you could see ball but nothing to prove without a doubt that it touched.

    And that's the problem they have to know for sure to overturn it and you can't say for 100% sure that it did touch. They got hosed.

    If the ruling on the field originally was that it was dropped and then the replay came back saying it hit the ground that would have been fine. But the original call was a catch and there just wasn't enough proof to overrule the ruling on the field.


    Exactly. I don't see how anyone can argue with this.
    User avatar
    bigtrain21
    * NET GIF Master *
     
    Posts: 1254
    Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2012 11:48 am


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sun Oct 06, 2013 6:27 am
  • At some point the refs have to just swallow their whistles and let the teams play. The refs were calling the game way too tight, the Pac-12 will never be considered a physical conference like the SEC when our league's refs are throwing flags like they are the stars of the game. If those refs were police officers, they would ticket a firetruck for double-parking even if the fire fighters were putting out a fire or give you a speeding ticket for going 1 mph over the speed limit.
    cover-2
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 542
    Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 11:47 am


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sun Oct 06, 2013 6:51 am
  • It'll be interesting to see how far the pollsters drop Washington after this loss. I say they drop to #21.
    Image
    You are absolutely entitled to state your opinion whenever you wish, and I am absolutely entitled to point out the stupidity of that opinion with the same frequency.
    User avatar
    SeatownJay
    * NET Staff Alumni *
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 6880
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:38 pm
    Location: Hagerstown, MD


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sun Oct 06, 2013 7:05 am
  • Such a horribly officiated game. Thinking about it, I'm not sure what was worse, last night's game or SB XL...

    I'm being honest, the last time I saw as many one sided phantom calls was our SB. And for the refs to decide the outcome, withOUT conclusive evidence was beyond ridiculous. Just absolutely pathetic.
    SUPERBOWL!!
    User avatar
    Hawkfan77
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1676
    Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 2:46 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sun Oct 06, 2013 7:07 am
  • seahawk2k wrote:This isn't a conversation if ASJ makes that catch.

    BS. The same can be said for almost any play that didn't result in a TD. Or if we didn't allow the first return TD or if we didn't allow that last TD before half.

    Who cares about the plays that "coulda should woulda" the play that mattered was the 4th and 10. Where there was NO CONCLUSIVE evidence to overturn the call on the field, NONE.
    SUPERBOWL!!
    User avatar
    Hawkfan77
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1676
    Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 2:46 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sun Oct 06, 2013 8:11 am
  • SeatownJay wrote:It'll be interesting to see how far the pollsters drop Washington after this loss. I say they drop to #21.
    17 I say, they barely lost to #5

    Side note, I've never seen yesterday's officiating crew until yesterday. Are they new? Think Stanford faked 3 injuries there at the end without being charged a single timeout.
    |~=[==~||~==]=~|
    ||Tfs LnD ] [ HAWKS||
    RIP BFS. He was kind of a douche, but he was our kind of a douche.
    User avatar
    ClumsyLurk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1702
    Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sun Oct 06, 2013 8:13 am
  • Hawkfan77 wrote:
    seahawk2k wrote:This isn't a conversation if ASJ makes that catch.

    BS. The same can be said for almost any play that didn't result in a TD. Or if we didn't allow the first return TD or if we didn't allow that last TD before half.

    Who cares about the plays that "coulda should woulda" the play that mattered was the 4th and 10. Where there was NO CONCLUSIVE evidence to overturn the call on the field, NONE.
    except the shot from behind with half the football on the grass. That looked pretty obvious to this husky fan. And that was a killer drop by a TE many want in the first round. Soooooo I care
    |~=[==~||~==]=~|
    ||Tfs LnD ] [ HAWKS||
    RIP BFS. He was kind of a douche, but he was our kind of a douche.
    User avatar
    ClumsyLurk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1702
    Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sun Oct 06, 2013 10:18 am
  • They only dropped 1 spot to 16, awsome
    User avatar
    jhawk91
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1186
    Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:44 am
    Location: Newberg, Oregon


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sun Oct 06, 2013 4:10 pm
  • Tical21 wrote:While I could very easily argue there wasn't enough evidence to overturn the call, thus making it a bad call, I would bet anybody 100/1 that the ball hit the ground first, so I can't bring myself to complain about it.

    The Huskies are the better team, I have no doubt, but made wayyyy too many mistakes. How many dumb penalties? How many drops? Four bad plays in the kicking game. Tonight was proof that no matter how incredible of a game you play, you can't beat a good team when you can't limit the mistakes.

    .


    Excellent post. We need to limit the errors and just as Price had to learn to trust the play calling (last year), Sark has to trust his team this year. I think we're better than he thinks we are. He needs to instill discipline, then let 'em play real football. Cut the cute shit, Sark.

    I was very hard on Sark last night after that dumbass pooch kick....but he does deserve a lot of credit for fielding a very good, young team. My desire to send Sark packing isn't all about Sark. It's about my belief that we will have to ultimately decide between he and Wilcox for HC. I don't want to be without Wilcox, so I am likely extra-critical of Sark.

    Great game Dawgs. You're better than your record.
    User avatar
    HawkWow
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 6216
    Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
    Location: The 5-0


PreviousNext


It is currently Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:34 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE NCAA FOOTBALL & PRO DRAFT FORUM ]




Information
  • Who is online
  • Users browsing this forum: volshawk and 5 guests