Stanford vs Washington

Discuss your thoughts about anything draft related. Mocks, College and Pro. Knock yourselves out!!! RATING: PG-13
Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:27 pm
  • Ouch...
    @ryanadamdavis
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 11423
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:28 pm
  • Damn. That sucks. Can't blame Price though, great D play.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18701
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:28 pm
  • Dammit.
    Image
    You are absolutely entitled to state your opinion whenever you wish, and I am absolutely entitled to point out the stupidity of that opinion with the same frequency.
    User avatar
    SeatownJay
    * NET Staff Alumni *
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 6889
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:38 pm
    Location: Hagerstown, MD


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:28 pm
  • we played them tough
    mrblitz
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1114
    Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 10:34 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:28 pm
  • Choke
    |~=[==~||~==]=~|
    ||Tfs LnD ] [ HAWKS||
    RIP BFS. He was kind of a douche, but he was our kind of a douche.
    User avatar
    ClumsyLurk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1702
    Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:28 pm
  • game over.
    Joe
    joeseahawks
    *The Prophet*
     
    Posts: 961
    Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 3:43 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:28 pm
  • ClumsyLurk wrote:Choke


    How so?
    User avatar
    CallMeADawg
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 597
    Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:24 am


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:29 pm
  • ClumsyLurk wrote:Choke


    That wasn't a choke. Just a great defensive play.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18701
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:29 pm
  • Game isn't over folks. 10 point diff. That's doable if they can get a stop.
    Marvin49 wrote:Ok. I have to admit. That's messed up.

    You win.
    User avatar
    Laloosh
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4273
    Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:46 pm
    Location: WA


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:29 pm
  • On a positive note, that was an impressive open field tackle by Smith.
    Image
    You are absolutely entitled to state your opinion whenever you wish, and I am absolutely entitled to point out the stupidity of that opinion with the same frequency.
    User avatar
    SeatownJay
    * NET Staff Alumni *
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 6889
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:38 pm
    Location: Hagerstown, MD


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:29 pm
  • Well, love you all.

    I gots to get up early to meet my boy Riley12, Dub Pub in Totem Lake, fools.

    XOXO

    Troy Walters
    @ryanadamdavis
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 11423
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:30 pm
  • He thew it right at the defender
    |~=[==~||~==]=~|
    ||Tfs LnD ] [ HAWKS||
    RIP BFS. He was kind of a douche, but he was our kind of a douche.
    User avatar
    ClumsyLurk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1702
    Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:30 pm
  • On that replay, looks like it may have been intercepted anyway, without the tip. DB was between the receiver and Price.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18701
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:31 pm
  • Clearly it was Sark's fault.
    Image
    You are absolutely entitled to state your opinion whenever you wish, and I am absolutely entitled to point out the stupidity of that opinion with the same frequency.
    User avatar
    SeatownJay
    * NET Staff Alumni *
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 6889
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:38 pm
    Location: Hagerstown, MD


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:33 pm
  • Huskies need to go to the Dave Meggett school of punt returns, always catch it moving forward, like a center fielder.
    User avatar
    seahawk2k
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1652
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:41 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:34 pm
  • big catch
    Marvin49 wrote:Ok. I have to admit. That's messed up.

    You win.
    User avatar
    Laloosh
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4273
    Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:46 pm
    Location: WA


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:34 pm
  • ASJ is having a down year, no.?
    |~=[==~||~==]=~|
    ||Tfs LnD ] [ HAWKS||
    RIP BFS. He was kind of a douche, but he was our kind of a douche.
    User avatar
    ClumsyLurk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1702
    Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:35 pm
  • Kasen is a beast.
    User avatar
    seahawk2k
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1652
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:41 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:35 pm
  • ClumsyLurk wrote:ASJ is having a down year, no.?


    Square peg in a round hole in this offense.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18701
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:36 pm
  • JSeahawks wrote:
    ClumsyLurk wrote:ASJ is having a down year, no.?


    Square peg in a round hole in this offense.
    never though a sweet TE like him wouldn't fit in any offense
    |~=[==~||~==]=~|
    ||Tfs LnD ] [ HAWKS||
    RIP BFS. He was kind of a douche, but he was our kind of a douche.
    User avatar
    ClumsyLurk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1702
    Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:37 pm
  • Onside kick?
    Image
    You are absolutely entitled to state your opinion whenever you wish, and I am absolutely entitled to point out the stupidity of that opinion with the same frequency.
    User avatar
    SeatownJay
    * NET Staff Alumni *
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 6889
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:38 pm
    Location: Hagerstown, MD


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:37 pm
  • JSeahawks wrote:
    ClumsyLurk wrote:ASJ is having a down year, no.?


    Square peg in a round hole in this offense.


    Took the words right out of my mouth, sir. Spot on. :th2thumbs:
    User avatar
    CallMeADawg
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 597
    Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:24 am


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:37 pm
  • Onsides kick... Get it, profit
    |~=[==~||~==]=~|
    ||Tfs LnD ] [ HAWKS||
    RIP BFS. He was kind of a douche, but he was our kind of a douche.
    User avatar
    ClumsyLurk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1702
    Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:37 pm
  • SeatownJay wrote:Onside kick?


    Yes, you need a 3 and out anyhow..
    User avatar
    CallMeADawg
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 597
    Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:24 am


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:38 pm
  • I think they played it right. Since Montgomery didn't score
    |~=[==~||~==]=~|
    ||Tfs LnD ] [ HAWKS||
    RIP BFS. He was kind of a douche, but he was our kind of a douche.
    User avatar
    ClumsyLurk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1702
    Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:42 pm
  • Just go for the TD. Period...end of story.
    @ryanadamdavis
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 11423
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:42 pm
  • Man, dumb play call by Stanford. That off tackle play from the power formation has been working all night. Why go away from it?
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18701
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:43 pm
  • Here we go Keith... here is your shot to show the scouts what you got.
    User avatar
    CallMeADawg
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 597
    Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:24 am


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:44 pm
  • Why did the clock still run anyways?
    @ryanadamdavis
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 11423
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:44 pm
  • That's a catch.
    Image
    You are absolutely entitled to state your opinion whenever you wish, and I am absolutely entitled to point out the stupidity of that opinion with the same frequency.
    User avatar
    SeatownJay
    * NET Staff Alumni *
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 6889
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:38 pm
    Location: Hagerstown, MD


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:44 pm
  • Elbow hit...that's a catch.
    @ryanadamdavis
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 11423
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:44 pm
  • Totally a catch!
    User avatar
    CallMeADawg
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 597
    Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:24 am


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:44 pm
  • Hands landed at the same time inbounds and out of bounds. Not sure what the ruling is on that.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18701
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:45 pm
  • pehawk wrote:Why did the clock still run anyways?

    Because the penalty was declined.
    Image
    You are absolutely entitled to state your opinion whenever you wish, and I am absolutely entitled to point out the stupidity of that opinion with the same frequency.
    User avatar
    SeatownJay
    * NET Staff Alumni *
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 6889
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:38 pm
    Location: Hagerstown, MD


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:48 pm
  • Looks incomplete to me
    |~=[==~||~==]=~|
    ||Tfs LnD ] [ HAWKS||
    RIP BFS. He was kind of a douche, but he was our kind of a douche.
    User avatar
    ClumsyLurk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1702
    Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:48 pm
  • Ball hit the grass. Sorry.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18701
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:48 pm
  • game not over yet.
    Joe
    joeseahawks
    *The Prophet*
     
    Posts: 961
    Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 3:43 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:49 pm
  • Not a catch but they might get away with it.
    User avatar
    pinksheets
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2836
    Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 3:47 pm
    Location: Seattle


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:50 pm
  • Make a decision already!
    Image
    You are absolutely entitled to state your opinion whenever you wish, and I am absolutely entitled to point out the stupidity of that opinion with the same frequency.
    User avatar
    SeatownJay
    * NET Staff Alumni *
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 6889
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:38 pm
    Location: Hagerstown, MD


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:50 pm
  • JSeahawks wrote:Ball hit the grass. Sorry.


    Doesn't matter as long as Smith had control of it, which to me it appeared he did.
    User avatar
    Spounge84
    *TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
    *TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 1907
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 3:16 pm
    Location: Lacey, WA


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:50 pm
  • Spounge84 wrote:
    JSeahawks wrote:Ball hit the grass. Sorry.


    Doesn't matter as long as Smith had control of it, which to me it appeared he did.


    Yes it does, because it hit the grass before it hit his arms. It was lying on the ground between his arms then he scooped it up.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18701
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:51 pm
  • God I hate these refs, and I hate our special teams. Good night sirs.
    |~=[==~||~==]=~|
    ||Tfs LnD ] [ HAWKS||
    RIP BFS. He was kind of a douche, but he was our kind of a douche.
    User avatar
    ClumsyLurk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1702
    Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:51 pm
  • oh that's phreaking bull####!!!!!!!!!
    mrblitz
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1114
    Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 10:34 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:51 pm
  • Damn. That's a crusher.
    Image
    User avatar
    Maelstrom787
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1416
    Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 12:38 pm
    Location: Delaware


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:51 pm
  • phyreaking @@@@oles
    mrblitz
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1114
    Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 10:34 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:51 pm
  • Not enough to overturn if those are the only angles. Not indisputable.
    User avatar
    DavidSeven
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4081
    Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:15 am


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:52 pm
  • screw that bullshit, there wasn't enough evidence to overturn that
    The LOLs of the many outweigh the shame of the few
    User avatar
    Msfann
    *BRONZE SUPPORTER*
    *BRONZE SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 1446
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:37 am


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:52 pm
  • DavidSeven wrote:Not enough to overturn if those are the only angles. Not indisputable.


    The angle from behind it was obvious.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18701
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:52 pm
  • Makeup call for "confirmed" catch where half of the receiver's body was dragging out of bounds before a single thread touched in bounds.
    Image
    User avatar
    minormillikin
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1883
    Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 12:32 pm
    Location: East Oly


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:52 pm
  • Didn't see it definitively hit the ground, they must have had a different camera angle, feel like the Huskies kind of got hosed there.
    User avatar
    seahawk2k
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1652
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:41 pm


PreviousNext


It is currently Wed Nov 26, 2014 4:57 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE NCAA FOOTBALL & PRO DRAFT FORUM ]




Information
  • Who is online
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests