Stanford vs Washington

Discuss your thoughts about anything draft related. Mocks, College and Pro. Knock yourselves out!!! RATING: PG-13
Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sun Oct 06, 2013 6:27 am
  • At some point the refs have to just swallow their whistles and let the teams play. The refs were calling the game way too tight, the Pac-12 will never be considered a physical conference like the SEC when our league's refs are throwing flags like they are the stars of the game. If those refs were police officers, they would ticket a firetruck for double-parking even if the fire fighters were putting out a fire or give you a speeding ticket for going 1 mph over the speed limit.
    cover-2
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 540
    Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 11:47 am


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sun Oct 06, 2013 6:51 am
  • It'll be interesting to see how far the pollsters drop Washington after this loss. I say they drop to #21.
    Image
    You are absolutely entitled to state your opinion whenever you wish, and I am absolutely entitled to point out the stupidity of that opinion with the same frequency.
    User avatar
    SeatownJay
    * NET Staff Alumni *
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 6195
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:38 pm
    Location: Hagerstown, MD


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sun Oct 06, 2013 7:05 am
  • Such a horribly officiated game. Thinking about it, I'm not sure what was worse, last night's game or SB XL...

    I'm being honest, the last time I saw as many one sided phantom calls was our SB. And for the refs to decide the outcome, withOUT conclusive evidence was beyond ridiculous. Just absolutely pathetic.
    SUPERBOWL!!
    User avatar
    Hawkfan77
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1674
    Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 2:46 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sun Oct 06, 2013 7:07 am
  • seahawk2k wrote:This isn't a conversation if ASJ makes that catch.

    BS. The same can be said for almost any play that didn't result in a TD. Or if we didn't allow the first return TD or if we didn't allow that last TD before half.

    Who cares about the plays that "coulda should woulda" the play that mattered was the 4th and 10. Where there was NO CONCLUSIVE evidence to overturn the call on the field, NONE.
    SUPERBOWL!!
    User avatar
    Hawkfan77
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1674
    Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 2:46 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sun Oct 06, 2013 8:11 am
  • SeatownJay wrote:It'll be interesting to see how far the pollsters drop Washington after this loss. I say they drop to #21.
    17 I say, they barely lost to #5

    Side note, I've never seen yesterday's officiating crew until yesterday. Are they new? Think Stanford faked 3 injuries there at the end without being charged a single timeout.
    |~=[==~||~==]=~|
    ||Tfs LnD ] [ HAWKS||
    RIP BFS. He was kind of a douche, but he was our kind of a douche.
    User avatar
    ClumsyLurk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1687
    Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sun Oct 06, 2013 8:13 am
  • Hawkfan77 wrote:
    seahawk2k wrote:This isn't a conversation if ASJ makes that catch.

    BS. The same can be said for almost any play that didn't result in a TD. Or if we didn't allow the first return TD or if we didn't allow that last TD before half.

    Who cares about the plays that "coulda should woulda" the play that mattered was the 4th and 10. Where there was NO CONCLUSIVE evidence to overturn the call on the field, NONE.
    except the shot from behind with half the football on the grass. That looked pretty obvious to this husky fan. And that was a killer drop by a TE many want in the first round. Soooooo I care
    |~=[==~||~==]=~|
    ||Tfs LnD ] [ HAWKS||
    RIP BFS. He was kind of a douche, but he was our kind of a douche.
    User avatar
    ClumsyLurk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1687
    Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sun Oct 06, 2013 10:18 am
  • They only dropped 1 spot to 16, awsome
    User avatar
    jhawk91
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1134
    Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:44 am
    Location: Newberg, Oregon


Re: Stanford vs Washington
Sun Oct 06, 2013 4:10 pm
  • Tical21 wrote:While I could very easily argue there wasn't enough evidence to overturn the call, thus making it a bad call, I would bet anybody 100/1 that the ball hit the ground first, so I can't bring myself to complain about it.

    The Huskies are the better team, I have no doubt, but made wayyyy too many mistakes. How many dumb penalties? How many drops? Four bad plays in the kicking game. Tonight was proof that no matter how incredible of a game you play, you can't beat a good team when you can't limit the mistakes.

    .


    Excellent post. We need to limit the errors and just as Price had to learn to trust the play calling (last year), Sark has to trust his team this year. I think we're better than he thinks we are. He needs to instill discipline, then let 'em play real football. Cut the cute shit, Sark.

    I was very hard on Sark last night after that dumbass pooch kick....but he does deserve a lot of credit for fielding a very good, young team. My desire to send Sark packing isn't all about Sark. It's about my belief that we will have to ultimately decide between he and Wilcox for HC. I don't want to be without Wilcox, so I am likely extra-critical of Sark.

    Great game Dawgs. You're better than your record.
    User avatar
    HawkWow
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5267
    Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
    Location: The 5-0


Previous


It is currently Mon Sep 22, 2014 12:27 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE NCAA FOOTBALL & PRO DRAFT FORUM ]




Information
  • Who is online