Fieldgulls: DEs revisited

Discuss your thoughts about anything draft related. Mocks, College and Pro. Knock yourselves out!!! RATING: PG-13
Fieldgulls: DEs revisited
Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:01 am

Re: Fieldgulls: DEs revisited
Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:31 am
  • Hmmm, interesting.
    Image
    User avatar
    Jazzhawk
    * NET News Scoop *
    * NET News Scoop *
     
    Posts: 9010
    Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 6:16 pm


Re: Fieldgulls: DEs revisited
Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:03 pm
  • That's our DangeRuss underneath Gholston lol. That Malliciah Goodman looks like an absolute monster.
    BAllenHawk
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 276
    Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 10:45 am
    Location: Tri-Cities, WA


Re: Fieldgulls: DEs revisited
Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:21 pm
  • To say Margus Hunt hasn't put up enough "swatted passes" and not even mention his 82 inch wingspan and his 17 career blocked kicks (10 FGs, 7 PATs), which ties for second in NCAA history (record is 19) is dumb. He will be on display at the Senior bowl and we all need to be sure and focus on his play. He's maybe a possible Seahawk pick in round 2 or 3. JS/PC like "long" and "physical freaks".

    Another "statistically abnormal" player that may be available in middle/later rounds is Keith Pough, OLB, 6-2, 236, Howard University. His record career total of **83 TACKLES-FOR-LOSS** are pretty unreal, even at a small school. See UTUBE highlights tape (just through his junior year) Note that this guy plays way faster than his straight line speed would suggest, instints and lateral quickness are evident. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tU8XCNIpDGE

    Q. Smith in rounds 5, 6 or 7 would make some sense, he looks fairly decent.
    <--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--> GO SEAHAWKS <--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><-->
    User avatar
    CamanoIslandJQ
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 918
    Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:11 am
    Location: Camano Island, WA


Re: Fieldgulls: DEs revisited
Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:31 pm
  • The guy who wrote that is a character to say the least.

    Sent me some tweets a few weeks ago boasting about how he had a natural flair for scouting because all of Seattle's draft picks last year were on his 'big board'. Completely out of the blue.
    User avatar
    theENGLISHseahawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 8067
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am


Re: Fieldgulls: DEs revisited
Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:56 pm
  • That was a great article. Really Intrigued by Smith in the later rounds. He only lists at 249, but by the look of him he could carry another twenty pounds at 6'5".
    I am a firm believer in luck, and I found that the harder I work the more I have of it.

    Yes. I am not happy so much. I am too seriously! .. Kap is not a great leader period!! Hurt my heart and s**t my painfully. ..
    CurryStopstheRuns
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2242
    Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:52 pm


Re: Fieldgulls: DEs revisited
Tue Jan 08, 2013 7:31 pm
  • Smith tore his ACL in November.
    User avatar
    theENGLISHseahawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 8067
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am


Re: Fieldgulls: DEs revisited
Tue Jan 08, 2013 9:11 pm
  • theENGLISHseahawk wrote:Smith tore his ACL in November.



    Yeah, I read that in the article. Still wouldn't mind using a seventh rounder on him. The nine month time range puts him back in August. If he recovered in six months we would have him in May. With the new injured reserve rules I would take the risk.
    I am a firm believer in luck, and I found that the harder I work the more I have of it.

    Yes. I am not happy so much. I am too seriously! .. Kap is not a great leader period!! Hurt my heart and s**t my painfully. ..
    CurryStopstheRuns
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2242
    Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:52 pm


Re: Fieldgulls: DEs revisited
Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:59 am
  • CurryStopstheRuns wrote:
    theENGLISHseahawk wrote:Smith tore his ACL in November.



    Yeah, I read that in the article. Still wouldn't mind using a seventh rounder on him. The nine month time range puts him back in August. If he recovered in six months we would have him in May. With the new injured reserve rules I would take the risk.


    If you're using a 7th round pick as a flyer anyway, might as well go for it in the late rounds. Though, if PC and JS can get him as a UDFA, they'll go that route if they want him I'm thinking.
    Super Bowl Champions XVLIII

    RIP Radish: Check your PMs. Upper right corner.
    User avatar
    Sarlacc83
    * NET Philistine *
     
    Posts: 15451
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
    Location: Portland, OR


Re: Fieldgulls: DEs revisited
Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:00 am
  • Meh. I don't get the hub-bub over Field Gulls. I'm not saying I'm a great writer or anything, but everybody says the folks there are, and I just see them as another fan site, with different backgrounds than this place and a format that is meant to seem intelligent and drive away non-kool-aid drinkers to what they're serving.

    This isn't just a rip on the site... I meant that article in particular was just not that interesting or persuasive.
    Image
    R.I.P. Dad. I miss you. You will never be forgotten
    1/12/39 - 8/7/08
    User avatar
    SharkHawk
    * NET Alumni *
     
    Posts: 3883
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:47 am


Re: Fieldgulls: DEs revisited
Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:27 pm
  • SharkHawk wrote:Meh. I don't get the hub-bub over Field Gulls. I'm not saying I'm a great writer or anything, but everybody says the folks there are, and I just see them as another fan site, with different backgrounds than this place and a format that is meant to seem intelligent and drive away non-kool-aid drinkers to what they're serving.

    This isn't just a rip on the site... I meant that article in particular was just not that interesting or persuasive.


    Danny Kelly does good work and Derrick Stephens is good during the draft season. Everyone else is pretty mediocre, IMO.
    I hate Tim Ruskell.
    User avatar
    Trrrroy
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2867
    Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:24 am


Re: Fieldgulls: DEs revisited
Wed Jan 09, 2013 1:11 pm
  • SharkHawk wrote:Meh. I don't get the hub-bub over Field Gulls. I'm not saying I'm a great writer or anything, but everybody says the folks there are, and I just see them as another fan site, with different backgrounds than this place and a format that is meant to seem intelligent and drive away non-kool-aid drinkers to what they're serving.

    This isn't just a rip on the site... I meant that article in particular was just not that interesting or persuasive.


    This is the first I've linked to one of their articles, actually. With a lot of the talk about defensive ends in the forum, it seemed appropriate.
    Super Bowl Champions XVLIII

    RIP Radish: Check your PMs. Upper right corner.
    User avatar
    Sarlacc83
    * NET Philistine *
     
    Posts: 15451
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
    Location: Portland, OR


Re: Fieldgulls: DEs revisited
Wed Jan 09, 2013 2:43 pm
  • Milliciah looked pretty good in his Bowl game. Certainly got my attention. Nothing splashy, but a "good, steady performer."
    "God Bless the Seattle Seahawks" Cortez Kennedy
    User avatar
    ivotuk
    * NET Nobody *
     
    Posts: 8716
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm
    Location: North Pole, Alaska


Re: Fieldgulls: DEs revisited
Wed Jan 09, 2013 5:09 pm
  • Sarlacc83 wrote:
    SharkHawk wrote:Meh. I don't get the hub-bub over Field Gulls. I'm not saying I'm a great writer or anything, but everybody says the folks there are, and I just see them as another fan site, with different backgrounds than this place and a format that is meant to seem intelligent and drive away non-kool-aid drinkers to what they're serving.

    This isn't just a rip on the site... I meant that article in particular was just not that interesting or persuasive.


    This is the first I've linked to one of their articles, actually. With a lot of the talk about defensive ends in the forum, it seemed appropriate.


    No knock on you. I appreciate the info. I just didn't think it was really persuasive. It seemed like he was even sort of waffling in the article. An actual article should leave you walking away from it saying, "THIS IS NOW MY OPINION" not, "I am still where I was before or I still am just not convinced at all....". This article didn't change my mind. Maybe I'm being hard headed, but usually I'm a pretty easily persuaded guy.
    Image
    R.I.P. Dad. I miss you. You will never be forgotten
    1/12/39 - 8/7/08
    User avatar
    SharkHawk
    * NET Alumni *
     
    Posts: 3883
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:47 am




It is currently Fri Oct 24, 2014 4:59 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE NCAA FOOTBALL & PRO DRAFT FORUM ]




Information
  • Who is online
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests