chris98251 wrote:Pioli will try to trade back and collect picks if he is still there. That in itself is a big question.
Scottemojo wrote:Barkley. Like English says. There will be rumors of all kinds of stupid shit for months, and then they will take Barkley.
theENGLISHseahawk wrote:I think it's incredibly silly, some of the things people are talking about regarding Barkley. I get the people who never rated him (although I fundamentally disagree with their take). But to hammer him this year having previously touted him as the #1 pick? Did these people watch USC this year? The entire defense was a joke. Kiffin spent more time being a total wanker to the media and playing silly mind-games than actually doing his job. Kiffin deserves complete blame for that shambles this year at SC.
Barkley had almost the same TD's as last year. He had a few more picks, but then had a similar volume increase in sacks playing behind a much weaker offensive line. He wasn't faultless and had bad games. But some of the stuff written about him is silly. Ultimately you know what you're going to bet from Matt Barkley. What he lacks physically he'll make up for technically.
Erebus wrote:Isnt that because you're a Ducks fan?
JSeahawks wrote:Erebus wrote:Isnt that because you're a Ducks fan?
Nope. I've seen him put up huge yardage and have great games against the Ducks, so if anything that would make me think more highly of him. He played way better against the Ducks twice then Andrew Luck ever did, and i was hugely high on Luck.
Its because I dont feel he's very good when he's pressured. I dont think he has a huge arm (although its certainly not weak). I dont think he's athletic enough to avoid the rush. And I think he benefits hugely from having the 2 best playmakers at WR in the country.
pehawk wrote:JSeahawks wrote:Erebus wrote:Isnt that because you're a Ducks fan?
Nope. I've seen him put up huge yardage and have great games against the Ducks, so if anything that would make me think more highly of him. He played way better against the Ducks twice then Andrew Luck ever did, and i was hugely high on Luck.
Its because I dont feel he's very good when he's pressured. I dont think he has a huge arm (although its certainly not weak). I dont think he's athletic enough to avoid the rush. And I think he benefits hugely from having the 2 best playmakers at WR in the country.
Knock it off with sound reasoning, Akili.
hai wrote:Lets say KC does trade back, who will take the #1; Which player is worthy of the #1 that some teams might trade up for?
It is currently Tue Apr 24, 2018 10:28 am
Return to [ THE NCAA FOOTBALL & PRO DRAFT FORUM ]