They ran out a 12th man (pun) as the Duke kicker nailed a 53 yarder FG. 5 yard penalty - and then the Duke kicker missed a 48 yarder.
Shady and brilliant.
Cincinnati just iced a kicker w/o timeout
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Cincinnati just iced a kicker w/o timeout
Thu Dec 27, 2012 5:24 pm
-
@ryanadamdavis
-
pehawk - NET Pro Bowler
- Posts: 15446
- Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm
-
Re: Cincinnati just iced a kicker w/o timeout
Thu Dec 27, 2012 5:43 pm
-
Wasn't watching, why didn't Duke decline the penalty if they had made the 53 yarder?
- kobebryant
- NET Veteran
- Posts: 2230
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 1:45 pm
Re: Cincinnati just iced a kicker w/o timeout
Thu Dec 27, 2012 6:08 pm
-
Don't think you can decline illegal substitution?@ryanadamdavis
-
pehawk - NET Pro Bowler
- Posts: 15446
- Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm
-
Re: Cincinnati just iced a kicker w/o timeout
Fri Dec 28, 2012 12:22 pm
-
kobebryant wrote:Wasn't watching, why didn't Duke decline the penalty if they had made the 53 yarder?
It's a dead ball foul, it can't be declined.THIS SPACE FOR RENT-
SeatownJay - * NET Staff Alumni *
- Posts: 9902
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:38 pm
- Location: Hagerstown, MD
-
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
It is currently Fri Apr 20, 2018 4:13 pm
Return to [ THE NCAA FOOTBALL & PRO DRAFT FORUM ]
Information
-
- Who is online
- Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests