A&M 26 pt Underdogs

HawkGA

New member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
107,412
Reaction score
1
50 seconds for Alabama to score a TD and A&M's first offensive "play" is a delay of game. I think 26 is quite doable.
 
OP
OP
pmedic920

pmedic920

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
28,672
Reaction score
4,400
Location
On the lake, Livingston Texas
HawkGA":3j7665bp said:
50 seconds for Alabama to score a TD and A&M's first offensive "play" is a delay of game. I think 26 is quite doable.

Sure it is.

Look at scoring for them vs opponents in there first 3 games.

Something like 170-28 or there bouts.
 
OP
OP
pmedic920

pmedic920

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
28,672
Reaction score
4,400
Location
On the lake, Livingston Texas
That dam “targeting” rule.

Pussifacation of America.

That was totally incidental contact.

Now a team has to play w/o their defensive Captain.

Sad, very sad.
 

HawkGA

New member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
107,412
Reaction score
1
pmedic920":5wnm73ji said:
That dam “targeting” rule.

Pussifacation of America.

That was totally incidental contact.

Now a team has to play w/o their defensive Captain.

Sad, very sad.

I don't like the rule but I do think that was a reasonably fair application of the rule. Not quite as bad as the hit against Wazzu's QB last night but the guy still led with his helmet.
 
OP
OP
pmedic920

pmedic920

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
28,672
Reaction score
4,400
Location
On the lake, Livingston Texas
HawkGA":8sazyl5f said:
pmedic920":8sazyl5f said:
That dam “targeting” rule.

Pussifacation of America.

That was totally incidental contact.

Now a team has to play w/o their defensive Captain.

Sad, very sad.

I don't like the rule but I do think that was a reasonably fair application of the rule. Not quite as bad as the hit against Wazzu's QB last night but the guy still led with his helmet.

It’s a BS rule in my opinion.

It’s too freaking subjective.

Two people ( you & I) can see totally different things.

In my opinion you need to try to figure out the player’s intent, and that’s almost impossible in some circumstances.

In my opinion that was not targeting because there wasn’t intent. The contact was incidental.

It’s very hard to lead with the shoulder w/o having the head included in some fashion.

Again it’s subjective, you see one thing, I see another.

Refs and re-play officials are the same.

It’s a freaking rule that doesn’t, and won’t get applied equally across ALL games.

It’s a rule that can easily effect the outcome of a game, and ultimately the outcome of a team’s season.

I simply don’t like it, doesn’t mean I’m right and others are wrong.
I just don’t like it.
 

HawkGA

New member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
107,412
Reaction score
1
pmedic920":2tc1ifvu said:
HawkGA":2tc1ifvu said:
pmedic920":2tc1ifvu said:
That dam “targeting” rule.

Pussifacation of America.

That was totally incidental contact.

Now a team has to play w/o their defensive Captain.

Sad, very sad.

I don't like the rule but I do think that was a reasonably fair application of the rule. Not quite as bad as the hit against Wazzu's QB last night but the guy still led with his helmet.

It’s a BS rule in my opinion.

It’s too freaking subjective.

Two people ( you & I) can see totally different things.

In my opinion you need to try to figure out the player’s intent, and that’s almost impossible in some circumstances.

In my opinion that was not targeting because there wasn’t intent. The contact was incidental.

It’s very hard to lead with the shoulder w/o having the head included in some fashion.

Again it’s subjective, you see one thing, I see another.

Refs and re-play officials are the same.

It’s a freaking rule that doesn’t, and won’t get applied equally across ALL games.

It’s a rule that can easily effect the outcome of a game, and ultimately the outcome of a team’s season.

I simply don’t like it, doesn’t mean I’m right and others are wrong.
I just don’t like it.

I think the personal foul aspect of it is overly severe as it is. I think the ejection part is ridiculous.
 

Seahawkfan80

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
11,205
Reaction score
613
pmedic920":1bartbhh said:
Seahawkfan80":1bartbhh said:
So they need a tie... :stirthepot:

No

A&M has a loss already.

Bama needs a loss.

YMMV
:{)


Thankfully, TCU @ Texas starts soon, I can change channels.

Ok...so Bama lose......easier to say than A and M win.

Are you qualified to change the channel??? :p
 
OP
OP
pmedic920

pmedic920

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
28,672
Reaction score
4,400
Location
On the lake, Livingston Texas
Seahawkfan80":9vknfw3u said:
pmedic920":9vknfw3u said:
Seahawkfan80":9vknfw3u said:
So they need a tie... :stirthepot:

No

A&M has a loss already.

Bama needs a loss.

YMMV
:{)


Thankfully, TCU @ Texas starts soon, I can change channels.

Ok...so Bama lose......easier to say than A and M win.

Are you qualified to change the channel??? :p

Not sure but I have the remote in my hand, and there’s not a MoFo close enough to stop me.
 

Seahawkfan80

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
11,205
Reaction score
613
pmedic920":28w10xns said:
Seahawkfan80":28w10xns said:
pmedic920":28w10xns said:
Seahawkfan80":28w10xns said:
So they need a tie... :stirthepot:

No

A&M has a loss already.

Bama needs a loss.

YMMV
:{)


Thankfully, TCU @ Texas starts soon, I can change channels.

Ok...so Bama lose......easier to say than A and M win.

Are you qualified to change the channel??? :p

Not sure but I have the remote in my hand, and there’s not a MoFo close enough to stop me.

That game is on Fox here.

Remotes....I have been in quite a few motels...and sometimes the remote does not work as planned. I move the batteries around and then it works. Kinda gets tiring that I have to make sure they work most of the time.
 
OP
OP
pmedic920

pmedic920

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
28,672
Reaction score
4,400
Location
On the lake, Livingston Texas
Seahawkfan80":r07uyqah said:
pmedic920":r07uyqah said:
Seahawkfan80":r07uyqah said:
pmedic920":r07uyqah said:
No

A&M has a loss already.

Bama needs a loss.

YMMV
:{)


Thankfully, TCU @ Texas starts soon, I can change channels.

Ok...so Bama lose......easier to say than A and M win.

Are you qualified to change the channel??? :p

Not sure but I have the remote in my hand, and there’s not a MoFo close enough to stop me.

That game is on Fox here.

Remotes....I have been in quite a few motels...and sometimes the remote does not work as planned. I move the batteries around and then it works. Kinda gets tiring that I have to make sure they work most of the time.

I hope you wear gloves.
NEVER touch a “hotel remote” with bare hands.

Look it up, I’m being truthful.

GoFrogs.
 

Seahawkfan80

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
11,205
Reaction score
613
Been on for a while.....you gonna start a thread for the froggys?
 

HawkGA

New member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
107,412
Reaction score
1
Bama up by 18. Need a bit more to get over the 26.
 

Seahawkfan80

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
11,205
Reaction score
613
HawkGA":1ctra3ly said:
Bama up by 18. Need a bit more to get over the 26.

I had a gut feeling that would not happen. I have not seen too much college ball this year due to the work I am doing. And last weekend was a golf tournament that I went and watched. Did not see much there too.
 

Latest posts

Top