This. We had the talent last year…as horrid as the defense was, there appeared to be talent.
The last 3-4 years, it’s felt like we weren’t playing to our rosters strengths on the defensive side of the ball…example: Wagner or Adams getting stuck on TEs or receivers in motion. Some of it...
Not sure what he has left…his age doesn’t correspond with the number of games he’s played.
Probably not news/post worthy but…here ya go
Penny to Panthers
Voted 20 and then read the thread. 50 may be a good idea.
I imagine you moderators and admin types deal with quite a bit of nonsense.
Thank you guys for running the best Hawks site there is!
New staff…positions that they haven’t had at the NFL level.
A bottom dwelling defense that appears to have gotten better after the draft.
Man…I just don’t know. That’s part of the excitement. If our D performs like Baltimore’s defense did vs us last year, I’ll chalk that up as a W.
I do...
I think drafted players need a longer restriction if they chose to sit/not play for a team.
As it stands, they only have to sit out a year and re-enter the draft. If they sit out that next year as well, they are then a FA.
Maybe make it two or three years and then automatically become a FA.
I think he’s a good player with the potential to be great. But, no doubt he’s got to get the antics under control.
There’s a whole lot of yapping going on…
The NFL is full of star athletes. Hungry for success. He’s not going to come in and do what Stroud did.
No doubt he was a dog when he played for us.
I’ve seen him represent SF and talk down about the Hawks too much to care for what he says these days.
Player = phenomenal. Person =…..I don’t have nice things to say.
No. Highly unlikely.
What I said was probably his best case scenario.
Just saying that if they are indeed interested in him, there’s got to be a plan or attraction with it. Where’s the positive?
If I were GM? No…that wouldn’t be a roster spot I’d give up….
Agreeing with you…but if they...