We know as much as is reasonably possible that Geno will be starting.
The difference in quality between what Geno has done as a starter here and what Howell brought to the table last year is not small.
The difference is Geno is a veteran on the back end of his career. Commanders brought in a...
Again, you just said 3 of 4 day 1/2 guys were good picks.
Olu is looking like he will be starting next year but outside of special teamers, nobody grabbed on day 3 can be realistically judged on 1 season of--usually--playing off the bench. If they were guys who were projected to be immediate...
I mean, you just said that 3 out of the 4 of our day 1 & 2 picks were good/decent. How does that equal a bust?
I'm at a loss as to what we should be seeing from day 3 guys only 1 year into their NFL careers.
With the caveat that I don't watch college ball, I thought this was a good draft and like the philosophy behind it.
First and third round, we drafted guys who were not projected to be available. We got top 15 talent at 16 and 2nd round talent in the third and both at positions of need.
After...
That wasn't a report of an actual trade attempt by the Seahawks, it was Heavy.com making an article out of some other writer's idea for a trade he thinks we should consider. It was a click-bait headline to make you think it was actual news.
I'm not saying the Seahawks wouldn't try to trade...
If we were to consider 'mobility', we would absolutely be starting Geno over Sam. Which we are. Schneider and Macdonald have now both said this.
This hasn't really been Geno's problem as Seahawks starter and definitely not this past year. In 2022, he got sacked on 33% of pressures which was...
He was one of the better returners in the league (both punt and kickoff), I don't know why those posts pop up about him all the time.
He was solid and dependable, but it seems lots of fans would rather trade that away for one kickoff return TD with a negative -1-yard average for every other...
Three overall thoughts on this:
1) I don't know why anyone thinks the timing on this is crazy or suspicious or whatever. To me, this is just like basic honesty. When they were making non-committal statements, they hadn't committed yet. Now they have, so they are making these statements. I mean...
Whose proposal is this, though? And why wouldn't the Broncos or Vikings offer more for the same deal, since they are in worse QB situations than the Seahawks?
And you continue to miss the point that I said I find the idea of trading up to get the #4 QB is fundamentally poor judgement. I don't...