You Seahawks won't be feeling it now, but if you win another one it will erase the demons of this one. The problem is winning another one. It took the pats 7 years to get over SB 42.
Also it's not quite the same to compare. Although NE lost to the Giants twice, the first three Superbowls were...
There's no other way of looking at it. Seahawks threw that game. But in regards to the team breaking up. It could have the opposite affect because they do still have last years win. So that team know's it can win a superbowl. It could be used as extra motivation to get back again and if they...
No guarantee with anything and the NFC has more strong teams. But I'd be surprised if RW doesn't win another SB so as long as you keep him you'll be up there.
I just hope the Seahawks team thinks the same way most of their fans do, because they will lose this game if they do. This is not the Broncos last year. The past won't let the hawks stick a thumbs up, jump over a tackle and let them in for a free touchdown. Hawks will have to work for it.
If...
If the pats lose, and it is an if, we won't accuse the Seahawks of being cheats (even though there are allegations of PED's). However the Pats beat the Seahawks and you know how it's gonna go with Seahawks fans.
You don't know the pats taped the Rams. Some guy in the media said they did and then retracted his statement. Besides it wasn't illegal at the time anyhow.
Stealers first 4 superbowls were due to steroids and the last two due to the refs handing them the game. Even one of your own fans in...
No no cheating in those games. Just the refs having a bad day to the stealers advantage right?
No proof the Pats taped the Rams ( and spying back then wasn't illegal anyhow). Just because someone says it doesn't mean it's true. Still no evidence of the pats ball tampering, for all the whining...